Cited by 850Artificial Intelligence in EducationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningEdcuational Technology Systems

Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Intelligent Assistant for Personalized and Adaptive Learning in Higher Education

Open access
Sajja, Ramteja, Sermet, Yusuf, Cikmaz, Muhammed, Cwiertny, David, Demir, Ibrahim·2024·Information

Abstract

This paper presents a novel framework, artificial intelligence-enabled intelligent assistant (AIIA), for personalized and adaptive learning in higher education. The AIIA system leverages advanced AI and natural language processing (NLP) techniques to create an interactive and engaging learning platform. This platform is engineered to reduce cognitive load on learners by providing easy access to information, facilitating knowledge assessment, and delivering personalized learning support tailored to individual needs and learning styles. The AIIA’s capabilities include understanding and responding to student inquiries, generating quizzes and flashcards, and offering personalized learning pathways. The research findings have the potential to significantly impact the design, implementation, and evaluation of AI-enabled virtual teaching assistants (VTAs) in higher education, informing the development of innovative educational tools that can enhance student learning outcomes, engagement, and satisfaction. The paper presents the methodology, system architecture, intelligent services, and integration with learning management systems (LMSs) while discussing the challenges, limitations, and future directions for the development of AI-enabled intelligent assistants in education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/info15100596

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sajja, R., Sermet, Y., Cikmaz, M., Cwiertny, D., & Demir, I.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • Department of Electrical Computer Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52246, USA
Corresponding author
Sajja, Ramteja
Venue
Information
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-09-30
Volume
15
Issue
10
Pages
596
ISSN
2078-2489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402988539
Cited by
620
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 236 · 2025: 337 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 4
FWCI
231.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Information (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Oceanic I& Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (NA22NWS4320003, 2230710)
  • National Science Foundation (NSF) (NA22NWS4320003, 2230710)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Edcuational Technology Systems
Keywords
personalized learning, adaptive learning, higher education, virtual teaching assistants, natural language processing, cognitive load reduction, personalized learning paths, virtual learning environments, student engagement, student satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review