The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Servitization of the manufacturing firm: Exploring the operations practices and technologies that deliver advanced services
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: This paper aims to explore practices and technologies successfully servitised manufacturers employ in the delivery of advanced services. Design/methodology/approach: A case study methodology is applied across four manufacturing organisations successful in servitization. Through interviews with personnel across host manufacturers, their partners, and key customers, extensive data are collected about service delivery systems. Analyses identify convergence in their practices and technologies. Findings: Six distinct technologies and practices are revealed: facilities and their location, micro-vertical integration and supplier relationships, information and communication technologies (ICTs), performance measurement and value demonstration, people deployment and their skills, and business processes and customer relationships. These are then combined in an integrative framework that illustrates how operations are configured to successfully deliver advanced services. Research limitations/implications: The analyses are reductive and rationalising. Future studies could identify other technologies and practices. Case study as a method is inherently limited in the extent to which findings can be generalised. Practical implications: Awareness and interest in servitization is growing, yet adoption of a servitization strategy requires particular organisational capabilities on the part of the manufacturer. This study identifies technologies and practices that underpin these capabilities. Originality/value: This paper contributes to the understanding of the servitization process and, in particular, the implications to broader operations of the firm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hartley, J. (2004) · Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research · doi:10.4135/9781446280119.n26 · Cited by 15,461
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103 · cited 2×
“Triangulation (Jick, 1979; Yin, 2003) was performed to verify responses.”
MethodEight types of product–service system: Eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet
Tukker, A. (2004) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.414 · Cited by 2,456
Cited by
Kristoffersen, E., Blomsma, F., Mikalef, P., & Li, J. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.044 · Cited by 841
Exploring How Usage-Focused Business Models Enable Circular Economy through Digital Technologies
Bressanelli, G., Adrodegari, F., Perona, M., & Saccani, N. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10030639 · Cited by 666
Transformational shifts through digital servitization
Tronvoll, B., Sklyar, A., Sörhammar, D., & Kowalkowski, C. (2020) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.005 · Cited by 413
A survey of smart product-service systems: Key aspects, challenges and future perspectives
Zheng, P., Wang, Z., Chen, C.-H., & Pheng Khoo, L. (2019) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2019.100973 · Cited by 377
Favoretto, C., Mendes, G. H. S., Oliveira, M. G., Cauchick-Miguel, P. A., & Coreynen, W. (2022) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.01.003 · Cited by 219
Suppatvech, C., Godsell, J., & Day, S. (2019) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.02.016 · Cited by 180
A perspective on value co-creation-oriented framework for smart product-service system
Liu, Z., Ming, X., Song, W., Qiu, S., & Qu, Y. (2018) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2018.04.021 · Cited by 92
Measuring servitization progress and outcome: the case of ‘advanced services’
Ziaee Bigdeli, A., Baines, T., Schroeder, A., Brown, S., Musson, E., Guang Shi, V., & Calabrese, A. (2018) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2018.1429029 · Cited by 79
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Baines, T., & W. Lightfoot, H.
- Venue
- International Journal of Operations & Production Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2013-12-20
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2-35
- ISSN
- 0144-3577 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1535372446
- Cited by
- 546
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 51.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.