Cited by 27Art Therapy and Mental HealthCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A literature-based intervention for women prisoners: preliminary findings

Billington, Josie, Longden, Eleanor, Robinson, Jude·2016·International Journal of Prisoner Health

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether Shared Reading (SR), a specific literature-based intervention, is transposable to a prison context and whether mental health benefits identified in other custodial and non-custodial settings were reported by women prisoners. Design/methodology/approach: In all, 35 participants were recruited within an all-female maximum security prison and attended one of two weekly reading groups. Qualitative data were collected through researcher observation of the reading groups; interviews and focus group discussions with participants and prison staff; interviews with the project worker leading the reading groups; and a review of records kept by the latter during group sessions. Findings: Attendance rates were good, with nearly half of the participants voluntarily present at =60 per cent of sessions. Two intrinsic psychological processes associated with the SR experience were provisionally identified, “memory and continuities” and “mentalisation”, both of which have therapeutic implications for the treatment of conditions like depression and personality disorder. Research limitations/implications: Limitations included the small sample, lack of control for confounding variables, and constraints imposed on data collection by the custodial setting. Originality/value: Although more controlled research is required, the findings indicate that women prisoners will voluntarily engage with SR if given appropriate support, and that the intervention has potential to augment psychological processes that are associated with increased well-being.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/ijph-09-2015-0031

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. 2008, Mental health treatment and the criminal justice system, Journal of Health & Biomedical Law, 4, 153
  2. 2007, Care of the mentally ill in prisons: challenges and solutions, Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 35, 406
  3. 2006, The power of stories/stories about power: why therapists and clients should read stories about the parental alienation syndrome, The American Journal of Family Therapy, 34, 191, 10.1080/01926180600550486 · DOI
  4. 2014, A literature-based intervention for people with chronic pain, Arts & Health, 8, 13, 10.1080/17533015.2014.957330 · DOI
  5. 2013, A literature-based intervention for older people living with dementia, Perspectives in Public Health, 133, 165, 10.1177/1757913912470052 · DOI
  6. Brooker, C., Gojkovic, D. and Sirdifield, C. (2007), “Mental health services and prisoners: an updated review”. Centre for Clinical and Academic Workforce Information (CCAWI), University of Lincoln, Lincoln.
  7. 2004, Using literature as a therapeutic tool with people with moderate and borderline learning disabilities in a forensic setting, British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 16, 10.1111/j.1354-4187.2003.00266.x · DOI
  8. 1996, Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies
  9. 2014, Incarceration nation, Newsletter of the American Psychological Association, 45, 56
  10. 2009, Enjoying and enduring: groups reading aloud for wellbeing, The Lancet, 373, 714, 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60426-8 · DOI
  11. 2008, Syntax and pathways, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 33, 265, 10.1179/174327908X392843 · DOI
  12. 2013, How Shakespeare tempests the brain: neuroimaging insights, Cortex, 49, 21
  13. 2012, Get into reading as an intervention for common mental health problems: exploring catalysts for change, Medical Humanities, 38, 15, 10.1136/medhum-2011-010083 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Emerson, R., Fretz, R. and Shaw, L. (2007), “Participant observation and fieldnotes”, in Atkinson, P., Coffey, A., Delamont, S., Lofland, J. and Lofland, L. (Eds), Handbook of Ethnography, Sage, London, pp. 352-68.
  15. 2008, The development of borderline personality disorder – a mentalizing model, Journal of Personality Disorders, 22, 4, 10.1521/pedi.2008.22.1.4 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 2010, Reading minds: mentalization, irony and literary engagement, International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 91, 915, 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2010.00279.x · DOI
  17. 2001, Read for Your Life: Literature as a Life Support System
  18. 2016, An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the experience of being in a reader group, Arts & Health: An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice, 8, 10.1080/17533015.2015.1121883 · DOI
  19. 2010, Double dissociation between cognitive and affective empathy in borderline personality disorder, Psychiatry Research, 175, 277, 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.03.002 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 2009, Reading together: the role of the reading group inside prison, Prison Service Journal, 183, 27
  21. 2013, Shakespeare in prison: affecting health and wellbeing, International Journal of Prisoner Health, 9, 111, 10.1108/IJPH-03-2013-0013 · DOI
  22. 2007, Reading between the lines: the experiences of taking part in a community reading project, Medical Humanities, 33, 100, 10.1136/jmh.2006.000256 · DOI
  23. Joint Prison Service and National Health Service Executive Working Group, 1999, The Future Organisation of Prison Healthcare
  24. 2012, A joint offender personality disorder pathway strategy: an outline summary, Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health Special Issue: Dangerous and Severe Personality Disorder and High Harm Offenders, 22, 210, 10.1002/cbm.1835 · DOI
  25. 2004, Couldn’t Keep It to Myself: Testimonies from Our Imprisoned Sisters
  26. 2006, Episodic autobiographical memory in depression: specificity, autonoetic consciousness, and self-perspective, Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 258, 10.1016/j.concog.2005.07.005 · DOI
  27. Liotti, G. and Gumley, A. (2008), “An attachment perspective on schizophrenia: the role of disorganized attachment, dissociation and mentalization”, in Moskowitz, A., Schäfer, I. and Dorahy, M.J. (Eds), Psychosis, Trauma and Dissociation: Emerging Perspectives on Severe Psychopathology, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, pp. 117-33. · DOI
  28. 2015, Shared reading: assessing the intrinsic value of a literature-based health intervention, Medical Humanities, 41, 113, 10.1136/medhum-2015-010704s · DOI
  29. 2001, The treatment of deliberate self-harm in borderline personality disorder using dialectical behaviour therapy: a pilot study in a high security hospital, Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29, 85, 10.1017/S1352465801001096 · DOI
  30. 2001, Fiction, poetry and mental health: expressive and therapeutic uses of literature, Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 8, 517, 10.1046/j.1351-0126.2001.00428.x · DOI
  31. 1998, Security of attachment as a predictor of symbolic and mentalising abilities: a longitudinal study, Social Development, 7, 1, 10.1111/1467-9507.00047 · DOI
  32. 1986, Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative
  33. 2015, Shall I compare thee’: the neural basis of literary awareness, and its benefits to cognition, Cortex, 73, 144
  34. 2012, Writing ethnographic fieldnotes, Canadian Journal of Sociology-Cahiers Canadiens De Sociologie, 37, 197
  35. 1997, Realistic Evaluation
  36. 2005, A bibliotherapy evaluation tool: grounding counselors in the therapeutic use of literature, The Arts in Psychotherapy, 32, 47, 10.1016/j.aip.2004.11.001 · DOI
  37. 2008, Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences
  38. 2011, Pedagogy for prisoners: an approach to peer health education for inmates, Journal of Correct Health Care, 17, 6, 10.1177/1078345810378251 · DOI
  39. Sanjek, R. (Ed.) (1990), Fieldnotes: The Makings of Anthropology, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY. · DOI
  40. 2007, Shakespeare Inside: The Bard Behind Bars
  41. 2012, Interpreting Qualitative Data
  42. 2008, What can a book do behind bars?, The Reader, 32, 60
  43. 2009, Women’s health in prison: urgent need for improvement in gender equity and social justice, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 87, 406, 10.2471/BLT.09.066928 · DOI
  44. 2015, The Prison Book Club
  45. 2006, Manual assisted cognitive treatment for deliberate self-harm in borderline personality disorder patients, Journal of Personality Disorders, 20, 482, 10.1521/pedi.2006.20.5.482 · DOI
  46. 1988, Autobiographical memory in depression, Psychological Medicine, 18, 689, 10.1017/S0033291700008370 · DOI
  47. 2009, The health and health care of US prisoners: results of a nationwide survey, American Journal of Public Health, 99, 666, 10.2105/AJPH.2008.144279 · DOI
  48. 2008, Bibliosupervision: a multiple-baseline study using literature in supervision settings, Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 3, 428, 10.1080/15401380802531052 · DOI
  49. 2008, Event-related potential characterisation of the Shakespearean functional shift in narrative sentence structure, NeuroImage, 40, 923, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.006 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 27

Metadata

Authors
Billington, J., Longden, E., & Robinson, J.
Affiliations
University of Liverpool (GB)
Venue
International Journal of Prisoner Health
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2016-12-19
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
230-243
ISSN
1744-9200 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2560055559
Cited by
27
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
25.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Prisoner Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Art Therapy and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
shared reading, literature-based intervention, women prisoners, prison mental health, book clubs, mentalization, depression, personality disorders, well-being, maximum security prisons
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, England, Female, Humans, Literature, Mental Health, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Prisoners, Prisons, Reading, Women's Health, Focus Groups, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review