Implementation of sustainable public procurement in local governments: a measurement approach
Abstract
Purpose: Assessing and measuring the extent of organization-level policy implementation has received little scholarly attention, especially in the areas of local governments' procurement and environmental protection. To rectify the paucity of research in this area, this paper adopts Leonard-Barton's (1988) conceptualization of the misalignment between the (policy) innovation and the organization and draws on an original survey of local government finance, environment and public works departments in a representative sample of US cities with at least 25,000 residents to develop a strategy for measuring the extent of the implementation of a sustainable procurement policy (SPP) in local governments. Design/methodology/approach: The authors demonstrate through the construction of a composite index that in order for a SPP to be fully implemented, standards and rules, routines and decision-making criteria need to exist to reconcile any technical, infrastructural and decision-making misalignments between the new policy and an organization's pre-existing norms and routines. Findings: The authors empirically assess and demonstrate that the paper's proposed composite measure of policy implementation is robust to multiple specifications and measurement reliability and construct validity tests. Originality/value: Whereas the existing literature from political science and policy science has tended to focus on higher levels of implementation in government through a complex hierarchical system, this paper underscores the importance of the policy implementation at the organizational level. Moreover, the authors contribute methodologically by our development of a strategy to measure the extent of the implementation of a SPP by local governments.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Centralisation can be a possible barrier to GPP.
“Conversely, Stritch et al. (2020) highlighted centralisation as a possible barrier (see also Hsueh et al., 2020).”
From Green public procurement as an effective way for sustainable development: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Hsueh et al., 2020
Centralisation is a barrier to GPP.
“Centralisation Stritch et al. (2020); Hsueh et al. (2020)”
From Green public procurement as an effective way for sustainable development: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Hsueh et al. (2020)
Cites
Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory
May, C. R., Mair, F., Finch, T., MacFarlane, A., Dowrick, C., Treweek, S., Rapley, T., Ballini, L., Ong, B. N., Rogers, A., et al. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-29 · Cited by 1,409 · see citing works
Sustainable procurement in the public sector: an international comparative study
Brammer, S., & Walker, H. (2011) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443571111119551 · Cited by 731 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ortega Carrasco, P., Iannone, F., Ferrón Vílchez, V., & Testa, F. (2025) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.3234 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Dimand, A. M. (2022) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijpsm-10-2021-0239 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hsueh, L., Bretschneider, S., Stritch, J. M., & Darnall, N.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- Venue
- International Journal of Public Sector Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2020-09-02
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6/7
- Pages
- 697-712
- ISSN
- 0951-3558 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3082450475
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 4.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Public Sector Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Keywords
- sustainable public procurement, local government, policy implementation, organizational misalignment, composite index, environmental protection, procurement policy, decision-making criteria, organizational routines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review