Cited by 33Public Procurement and PolicyPublic Policy and Administration ResearchSustainable Supply Chain Management

Implementation of sustainable public procurement in local governments: a measurement approach

Hsueh, Lily, Bretschneider, Stuart, Stritch, Justin M., Darnall, Nicole·2020·International Journal of Public Sector Management

Abstract

Purpose: Assessing and measuring the extent of organization-level policy implementation has received little scholarly attention, especially in the areas of local governments' procurement and environmental protection. To rectify the paucity of research in this area, this paper adopts Leonard-Barton's (1988) conceptualization of the misalignment between the (policy) innovation and the organization and draws on an original survey of local government finance, environment and public works departments in a representative sample of US cities with at least 25,000 residents to develop a strategy for measuring the extent of the implementation of a sustainable procurement policy (SPP) in local governments. Design/methodology/approach: The authors demonstrate through the construction of a composite index that in order for a SPP to be fully implemented, standards and rules, routines and decision-making criteria need to exist to reconcile any technical, infrastructural and decision-making misalignments between the new policy and an organization's pre-existing norms and routines. Findings: The authors empirically assess and demonstrate that the paper's proposed composite measure of policy implementation is robust to multiple specifications and measurement reliability and construct validity tests. Originality/value: Whereas the existing literature from political science and policy science has tended to focus on higher levels of implementation in government through a complex hierarchical system, this paper underscores the importance of the policy implementation at the organizational level. Moreover, the authors contribute methodologically by our development of a strategy to measure the extent of the implementation of a SPP by local governments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/ijpsm-09-2019-0233

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hsueh, L., Bretschneider, S., Stritch, J. M., & Darnall, N.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Venue
International Journal of Public Sector Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2020-09-02
Volume
33
Issue
6/7
Pages
697-712
ISSN
0951-3558 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3082450475
Cited by
33
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Public Sector Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
sustainable public procurement, local government, policy implementation, organizational misalignment, composite index, environmental protection, procurement policy, decision-making criteria, organizational routines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review