The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A research framework for social commerce adoption
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Social relationships on the internet through the emergence of Web 2.0 applications created new opportunities for business. This is mainly because of the growth of social networking sites, which has also developed e‐commerce. The current development in e‐commerce opened a new stream, entitled social commerce, which is using social technologies to create an environment for generating social interactions. These social interactions can drive online social support in e‐commerce, which in turn is creating trust and an increased intention to use social commerce. Design/methodology/approach: This research used social support theory and related theories on intention to use to propose a theoretical framework for the adoption of social commerce. Findings: The model predicts that forums and communities, ratings, reviews, referrals and recommendations are helping to introduce new business plans for e‐vendors. The model also shows trust is an on‐going issue in e‐commerce and can be built through social commerce constructs. Research limitations/implications: There is limited research in the area of social commerce which this study seeks to redress. This study proposes a new model which can be extended by other constructs. However, the research needs to empirically test the constructs of the proposed model and their relationship. Originality/value: This paper introduces social commerce constructs, namely; recommendations and referrals, forums and communities and rating and reviews. The bases of the model proposed in this research are IT adoption and literature in the area such as PU and intention to buy or trust. These highlight the key role of ICT in the behaviour of online customers. This can be a development for e‐commerce adoption models and the results signify that IS has a reference discipline for the behaviour of online consumers. This is an issue in marketing where not enough attention is paid to the importance of IT and IS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model1
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036519 · Cited by 8,635
(2003) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275 · Cited by 5,715
Mathieson, K. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.173 · Cited by 4,216
Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2004) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2004.01.006 · Cited by 2,025
The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption
Drexel University, Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Georgia State University (2000) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00008 · Cited by 1,833
Introduction to the special issue social commerce: A research framework for social commerce
Liang, T.-P., & Turban, E. (2011) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.2753/jec1086-4415160201 · Cited by 960
Credibility of information in online communities
Hajli, M. N., Sims, J., Featherman, M., & Love, P. E. D. (2015) · Journal of Strategic Marketing · doi:10.1080/0965254x.2014.920904 · Cited by 109
Self-citation
Cited by
A study of the impact of social media on consumers
Hajli, M. N. (2014) · International Journal of Market Research · doi:10.2501/ijmr-2014-025 · Cited by 854
Self-citationSocial commerce constructs and consumer’s intention to buy
Hajli, N. (2015) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.12.005 · Cited by 826
Understanding social commerce: A systematic literature review and directions for further research
Busalim, A. H., & Hussin, A. R. C. (2016) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.06.005 · Cited by 369
Social commerce: The transfer of power from sellers to buyers
Hajli, N., & Sims, J. (2015) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.01.012 · Cited by 298
Saudi Journal of Business and Management Studies
(2019) · Saudi Journal of Business and Management Studies · doi:10.21276/sjbms · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Hajli, M.
- Venue
- Information Management & Computer Security
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2013-07-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 144-154
- ISSN
- 0968-5227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032040417
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 43.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A research framework for social commerce adoption. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/imcs-04-2012-0024
- The paper
- Hajli, M. (2013). A research framework for social commerce adoption. Information Management & Computer Security. https://doi.org/10.1108/imcs-04-2012-0024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.