Cited by 109Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityDigital Marketing and Social MediaSocial Media in Health Education

Credibility of information in online communities

Open access
Hajli, M. Nick, Sims, Julian, Featherman, Mauricio, Love, Peter E.D.·2015·Journal of Strategic Marketing

Abstract

Social media and Web 2.0 empower individuals to generate content online. It is important to better understand the potential added value of social media for e-health service provision. Social support and credibility of health related information generated via social media is a big challenge for online health communities. In this qualitative research, content of discussions from an online health community is analysed. Two themes are examined: online social support and credibility of online forums. Findings show accuracy and credibility of online communities – user profiles, ratings of posts and improved monitoring of content by advisors improve perceived credibility and trust in online forums and communities. Accuracy and perceived credibility of online health communities is pivotal in facilitating social relationships. While consumers are concerned about the credibility of online information, they benefit from social support and are increasingly turning to social media as a source of information and support. Organizations can benefit from better understanding consumer's use of social media, their concerns about information credibility and need for social support.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0965254x.2014.920904

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hajli, M. N., Sims, J., Featherman, M., & Love, P. E. D.
Affiliations
  • University of London (GB)
  • Washington State University (US)
  • Curtin University (AU)
Venue
Journal of Strategic Marketing
Published
2014-05-22
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
238-253
ISSN
  • 0965-254X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4488
OpenAlex
W2027641568
Cited by
109
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Strategic Marketing (publishedVersion)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (submittedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
Keywords
online health communities, information credibility, social support, social media, e-health, online forums, user-generated content, trust, health information, consumer behavior, Web 2.0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review