The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Building brand loyalty through user engagement in online brand communities in social networking sites
Abstract
Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to explore the concept of user engagement in the context of online brand communities. A research model is proposed to explain how brand loyalty is developed through user engagement. Design/methodology/approach: – The research model was empirically tested with an online survey study of 185 current Facebook users. Findings: – Results revealed that user engagement influenced brand loyalty both directly and indirectly through online community commitment. Users tend to focus on the benefits (rather than the costs) derived from the usage when they engage in an online brand community. Research limitations/implications: – The selection of respondents is bound to the Hong Kong area, while Facebook members are globally distributed. In addition, this study involved a cross-sectional design instead of investigating the development of brand loyalty from a long-term perspective. Practical implications: – The results inform e-marketers the importance of user engagement behaviors for building brand loyalty through online communities. Strategies that encourage members to engage in online brand communities on social networking sites such as Facebook are also provided. Originality/value: – The concept of user engagement in online brand communities is still poorly understood, underscoring the need for theoretically based research of user engagement. This paper enriches the knowledge in the area of brand engagement by presenting a research model that introduces the concept of user engagement in social media research and empirically examines its role in building brand loyalty in online brand communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800302 · Cited by 22,355
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x · Cited by 9,939
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018 · Cited by 6,479
Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.10073 · Cited by 5,916
Bem, D. J. (1972) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60024-6 · Cited by 5,241
Muniz, A. M., & O'Guinn, T. C. (2001) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/319618 · Cited by 3,998
Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., & Xue, Y. (2007) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148781 · Cited by 3,921
Customer engagement behavior: Theoretical foundations and research directions
van Doorn, J., Lemon, K. N., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P., & Verhoef, P. C. (2010) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670510375599 · Cited by 3,536
The Process of Customer Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Bowden, J. L.-H. (2009) · Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.2753/mtp1069-6679170105 · Cited by 1,365
A Penny for Your Thoughts: Referral Reward Programs and Referral Likelihood
Ryu, G., & Feick, L. (2007) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.71.1.084 · Cited by 257
Cited by
Consumer behavior in social commerce: A literature review
Zhang, K. Z. K., & Benyoucef, M. (2016) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2016.04.001 · Cited by 631
Engaging and retaining customers with AI and employee service
Prentice, C., & Nguyen, M. (2020) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102186 · Cited by 388
Schultz, C. D. (2017) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2017.09.005 · Cited by 191
Impact of online social media activities on marketing of green products
Gupta, M., & Syed, A. A. (2022) · International Journal of Organizational Analysis · doi:10.1108/ijoa-02-2020-2037 · Cited by 46
Urrutikoetxea Arrieta, B., Polo Peña, A. I., & Martínez Medina, C. (2019) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-02-2016-0049 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Zheng, X., Cheung, C. M. K., Lee, M. K. O., & Liang, L.
- Venue
- Information Technology & People
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2015-03-02
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 90-106
- ISSN
- 0959-3845 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2110859446
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 66.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.