Cited by 15Technology Adoption and User BehaviourArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in Education

Adopting artificial intelligence driven technology in medical education

Abdekhoda, Mohammadhiwa, Dehnad, Afsaneh·2024·Interactive Technology and Smart Education

Abstract

Purpose: Artificial intelligence (AI) is a growing paradigm and has made considerable changes in many fields of study, including medical education. However, more investigations are needed to successfully adopt AI in medical education. The purpose of this study was identify the determinant factors in adopting AI-driven technology in medical education. Design/methodology/approach: This was a descriptive-analytical study in which 163 faculty members from Tabriz University of Medical Sciences were randomly selected by nonprobability sampling technique method. The faculty members’ intention concerning the adoption of AI was assessed by the conceptual path model of task-technology fit (TTF). Findings: According to the findings, “technology characteristics,” “task characteristics” and “TTF” showed direct and significant effects on AI adoption in medical education. Moreover, the results showed that the TTF was an appropriate model to explain faculty members’ intentions for adopting AI. The valid proposed model explained 37% of the variance in faulty members’ intentions to adopt AI. Practical implications: By presenting a conceptual model, the authors were able to examine faculty members’ intentions and identify the key determining factors in adopting AI in education. The model can help the authorities and policymakers facilitate the adoption of AI in medical education. The findings contribute to the design and implementation of AI-driven technology in education. Originality/value: The finding of this study should be considered when successful implementation of AI in education is in progress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/itse-12-2023-0240

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Abdekhoda and Dehnad highlighted the challenge that arises when technology is misaligned with the tasks it is intended to support.

    “Abdekhoda and Dehnad specifically highlighted the challenge that arises when technology is misaligned with the tasks it is intended to support and provided strategies to ensure successful technology adoption [180].”
  • Challenges related to faculty members included lack of AI knowledge and expertise, resistance to adopting new technologies, and struggles with staff shortages.

    “Challenges related to faculty members, such as the lack of AI knowledge and expertise [56, 180], resistance to adopting new technologies [5, 77, 180], and struggles with staff shortages, were also acknowledged in several studies [174].”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abdekhoda, M., & Dehnad, A.
Affiliations
  • Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Abdekhoda, Mohammadhiwa
Venue
Interactive Technology and Smart Education
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2024-01-29
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
535-545
ISSN
  • 1741-5659 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-8510
OpenAlex
W4391225535
Cited by
15
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 1
FWCI
5.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Interactive Technology and Smart Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence adoption, medical education, task-technology fit, technology characteristics, task characteristics, conceptual model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review