Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a systematic review
Abstract
Purpose: The literature on entrepreneurial ecosystems is fragmented, and yet, no studies have paid attention to integrating the available studies. The purpose of this study is to provide a systematic review of contributions related to entrepreneurial ecosystems. Design/methodology/approach: This literature review evaluates studies that are covered in the Web of Science index. Findings: In addition to the recent state of research (covering industries, geographical scopes, methodologies, etc.), this study provides an extension of Isenberg’s (2011) model of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Research limitations/implications: A new avenue arises for both conceptual and empirical research by emphasizing crowdsourcing as a contributing element for the entrepreneurial ecosystem. Future studies can evaluate the effectiveness of different types of crowdsourcing profoundly to make sure whether creating a promising ecosystem all types of crowdsourcing have a similar value or impact. Practical implications: For public policy and local decision-makers, both collaboration opportunities and interaction interfaces between the stakeholders of the entrepreneurial need to be reconsidered in the design of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Social implications: Higher degrees of collaboration, information exchange and innovation are likely to yield favorable entrepreneurship environments. Originality/value: Novelty of this study arises from integrating crowdsourcing theory in the systematic review of entrepreneurial ecosystems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The review uses a commonly accepted framework that has also formed the basis for other reviews, which allows drawing conclusions regarding the mechanisms.
“We review the empirical literature based on a commonly accepted framework that has also formed the basis for other reviews (e.g., Maroufkhani et al., 2018 ; Nicotra et al., 2018 ), which does allow us to draw conclusions regarding the mechanisms.”
From Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program (2022) · cites this paper as Maroufkhani et al., 2018
Cites
The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms
Miller, D. (1983) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770 · Cited by 5,853 · see citing works
The interdisciplinary study of coordination
Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1994) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/174666.174668 · Cited by 3,504 · see citing works
The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Bachrach, D. G., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2005) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.454 · Cited by 912 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program
Wurth, B., Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2022) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258721998948 · Cited by 789 · see citing works
“While recent reviews of the entrepreneurial ecosystem literature (e.g., Cao & Shi, 2020; Garavan et al., 2019 ; Hakala et al., 2020 ; Maroufkhani et al., 2018 ; Nicotra et al., 2018) have sought to bring together this rapidly shifting field, we advance on these works in three key ways.”
InfluentialBuilding sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: A holistic approach
Theodoraki, C., Dana, L.-P., & Caputo, A. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.005 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Chaudhary, S., Kaur, P., Alofaysan, H., Halberstadt, J., & Dhir, A. (2023) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3466 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
- Authors
- Maroufkhani, P., Wagner, R., & Wan Ismail, W. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Technology Malaysia (MY)
- University of Kassel (DE)
- Venue
- Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2018-07-10
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 545-564
- ISSN
- 1750-6204 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2867663180
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 12
- FWCI
- 3.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Enterprising Communities People and Places in the Global Economy (publishedVersion)
- UTM Institutional Repository (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Cultural Industries and Urban Development
- Keywords
- entrepreneurial ecosystems, crowdsourcing, stakeholder collaboration, entrepreneurship policy, innovation, information sharing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review