Cited by 18Public Procurement and PolicyCompetency Development and EvaluationConstruction Project Management and Performance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Infrastructure procurement skills gap amongst procurement personnel in Nigeria’s public sector

Open access

Abstract

Purpose: Procurement of public infrastructure that is fit for purpose partly depends on the competencies of procurement personnel. In many developing countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, including Nigeria, there is a deficit in the quantity and quality of infrastructure and their procurement is further riddled with deficiencies in the capacity of public procuring entities. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the critical skills development needs of public personnel involved in the procurement of infrastructure in Nigeria. Design/methodology/approach: Based on a quantitative research strategy, this study sought to address the knowledge gap through a survey of public infrastructure procurement personnel (n = 288) in different tiers of government (i.e. state and local government) and geopolitical contexts (north and south) in Nigeria. Findings: Of the 45 procurement skill areas operationalised, there is need for further development in 38 of them including: computing/ICT; problem-solving; communication; decision-making; health and safety management; quality management; relationship management; team building; project monitoring and evaluation; time management and procurement planning. Originality/value: A key implication of this study is for policymakers in state and local government to formulate and implement infrastructure procurement capacity development reforms that address the competency gaps of procurement personnel. Such reforms need to take into account the suitable methods for developing procurement competencies. Additionally, the procurement skill areas operationalised in this capacity assessment study could serve as a useful blueprint for studying capacity deficiencies amongst public infrastructure procurement personnel in other developing countries.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/jedt-09-2017-0089

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Table 1 identifies all the issues involved with public sector projects after investigating various projects/samples from Bangladesh, Denmark, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Malaysia, Myanmar, Nigeria, the Netherlands, the OECD, Pakistan, the Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam.

    “Table 1 identifies all the issues involved with public sector projects after investigating various projects/samples from Bangladesh, Denmark, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Malaysia, Myanmar, Nigeria, the Netherlands, the OECD, Pakistan, the Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam [9,27,34-41].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. 2011, Building relevant skills for public procurement, E-Procurement Bulletin, 2, 1
  2. 2009, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method Approaches
  3. Global Construction Perspectives and Oxford Economics (2013), “Global construction 2025. Global construction perspectives and Oxford Economics”, available at: www.globalconstruction2025.com/ (accessed 30 July 2015).
  4. 1993, Purchasing Education and Training: Requirements and Resources
  5. MOJ, 2012, Ministry of Justice - Procurement Competence Frameworks
  6. OGC, 2007, Sustainability: Achieving Excellence in Construction Procurement Guide 11
  7. OGC, 2008, An Introduction to Public Procurement
  8. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and World Bank, 2004, Good practice paper on procurement capacity development
  9. Oyo State Government, 2010, Strategic Health Development Plan (2010-2015)
  10. PPA, 2007, The Public Procurement Act
  11. UNDP, 2006, Procurement Capacity Assessment User’s Guide
  12. UNDP, 2007, Capacity Assessment Practice Note
  13. UNDP, 2010, Public Procurement Capacity Development Guide

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mahamadu, A.-M., Manu, P., Booth, C., Olomolaiye, P., Coker, A., Ibrahim, A., & Lamond, J.
Affiliations
  • University of the West of England (GB)
  • University of Ibadan (NG)
  • Ahmadu Bello University (NG)
Venue
Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2018-02-05
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
2-24
ISSN
1726-0531 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2776853206
Cited by
18
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Engineering Design and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
World Bank Group
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Competency Development and Evaluation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Construction Project Management and Performance
Keywords
public infrastructure procurement, skills gap, capacity building, public sector, Nigeria, state and local government, health and safety management, project monitoring and evaluation, procurement planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review