CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 178Organizational Change and LeadershipHealthcare Quality and ManagementAppreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sustaining organizational culture change in health systems

Willis, Cameron David, Saul, Jessie, Bevan, Helen, Scheirer, Mary Ann, Best, Allan, Greenhalgh, Trisha, Mannion, Russell, Cornelissen, Evelyn, Howland, David, Jenkins, Emily, Bitz, Jennifer·2016·Journal of Health Organization and Management
DOI 10.1108/jhom-07-2014-0117
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

PURPOSE: The questions addressed by this review are: first, what are the guiding principles underlying efforts to stimulate sustained cultural change; second, what are the mechanisms by which these principles operate; and, finally, what are the contextual factors that influence the likelihood of these principles being effective? The paper aims to discuss these issues. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The authors conducted a literature review informed by rapid realist review methodology that examined how interventions interact with contexts and mechanisms to influence the sustainability of cultural change. Reference and expert panelists assisted in refining the research questions, systematically searching published and grey literature, and helping to identify interactions between interventions, mechanisms and contexts. FINDINGS: Six guiding principles were identified: align vision and action; make incremental changes within a comprehensive transformation strategy; foster distributed leadership; promote staff engagement; create collaborative relationships; and continuously assess and learn from change. These principles interact with contextual elements such as local power distributions, pre-existing values and beliefs and readiness to engage. Mechanisms influencing how these principles sustain cultural change include activation of a shared sense of urgency and fostering flexible levels of engagement. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The principles identified in this review, along with the contexts and mechanisms that influence their effectiveness, are useful domains for policy and practice leaders to explore when grappling with cultural change. These principles are sufficiently broad to allow local flexibilities in adoption and application. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This is the first study to adopt a realist approach for understanding how changes in organizational culture may be sustained. Through doing so, this review highlights the broad principles by which organizational action may be organized within enabling contextual settings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/jhom-07-2014-0117

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Dagnone, T. (2009), “For patients’”, in Ministry of Health (Ed.), Patient First Review Commissioner’s Report to the Saskatchewan Minister of Health , Saskatchewan Government, Regina, pp. 1-68.
  2. Rogers, E.M. (1995), Diffusion of Innovations , The Free Press, New York, NY.
  3. Smircich, L. (1983), “Concepts of culture in organisational analysis”, Admistrative Science Quarterly , Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 328-358.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 178

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Willis, C. D., Saul, J., Bevan, H., Scheirer, M. A., Best, A., Greenhalgh, T., Mannion, R., Cornelissen, E., Howland, D., Jenkins, E., & Bitz, J.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • National Health Service (GB)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Saskatchewan Health (CA)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Health Organization and Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2016-03-21
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
2-30
ISSN
1477-7266 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1108/jhom-07-2014-0117
OpenAlex
W2286182763
Cited by
178
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Health Organization and Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0512-10031)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Appreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change
Keywords
organizational culture change, sustainability of change, health care system, guiding principles, distributed leadership, employee engagement, collaborative relationships, sense of urgency, organizational readiness, power distribution, organizational values and beliefs, organizational change, realist review
MeSH terms
Health Facilities, Organizational Innovation, Organizational Culture, Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review