CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 16Innovation and Knowledge ManagementEntrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesFirm Innovation and Growth

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

More than one way to get there: a configurational view on performance drivers in knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship

Open access
Moraes, Gustavo Hermínio Salati Marcondes de, Fischer, Bruno, Salles-Filho, Sergio, Meissner, Dirk, Dabic, Marina·2023·Journal of Knowledge Management
DOI 10.1108/jkm-03-2023-0267
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Purpose: Knowledge-intensive entrepreneurial firms (KIE) strongly rely on scientific and strategic research and development (R&D) capabilities to achieve higher performance levels. Hence, the purpose of this paper is to disentangle the effects of scientific capabilities and strategic R&D on KIE performance; and how the constituent elements of these dimensions can be configured to generate conditions for high performance. Design/methodology/approach: The authors’ empirical setting involves companies that submitted projects to the Innovative Research in Small Businesses (PIPE) program in Brazil. The authors then run partial least square structural equation modeling to verify how scientific and strategic R&D capabilities influence the performance construct. Second, the authors apply fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to identify configurations that are equifinal in terms of generating superior performance. Findings: Findings indicate a strong association between scientific capabilities and KIE performance. The configurational approach outlines the existence of multiple paths to success, but human capital stands as a core condition throughout estimations. Practical implications: The authors’ assessment has implications for how KIE firms are managed according to their organizational profiles and trajectories. Also, it advances the authors’ comprehension on how entrepreneurship policies can better target these distinct profiles. Originality/value: The authors’ analysis provides new evidence on the inherent complexity behind the generation of high performance in KIE when addressing their portfolios of knowledge-related capabilities. More than that, the authors were able to identify the existence of heterogeneous profiles that can equally lead to higher levels of performance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/jkm-03-2023-0267

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The PIPE dataset can glimpse the Brazilian scenario and is considered a consistent source.

    “This dataset can glimpse the Brazilian scenario once considered a consistent source (Fischer et al. 2022;de Moraes et al. 2023).”

    From Dynamic Configurations of Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Elements for Blended Value Creation (2025) · cites this paper as de Moraes et al. 2023

    Section 3.1 describes a validated survey of PIPE applicants, reports no significant differences between respondents and non-respondents on the characteristics tested, and presents São Paulo as an informative case for studying knowledge-intensive firms in a developing-country context. It does not establish that the dataset represents Brazil as a whole; the concluding remarks also acknowledge sampling bias because only PIPE applicants were studied. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 121

  1. 2019, Knowledge management, decision-making style and organizational performance, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4, 104, 10.1016/j.jik.2017.07.003 · DOI
  2. 2017, The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach, Small Business Economics, 49, 1, 10.1007/s11187-017-9864-8 · DOI
  3. 2016, User-Industry spinouts: downstream industry knowledge as a source of new firm entry and survival, Organization Science, 27, 18, 10.1287/orsc.2015.1029 · DOI
  4. 2014, Knowledge sources of entrepreneurship: firm formation by academic, user and employee innovators, Research Policy, 43, 1109, 10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.012 · DOI
  5. 2011, The Bayh-Dole act and scientist entrepreneurship, Research Policy, 40, 1058, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.006 · DOI
  6. 2017, A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: towards a future research agenda, European Planning Studies, 25, 887, 10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 2019, Configurations of knowledge-Intensive entrepreneurial ecosystems, RAE Revista de Administracao de Empresas, 59, 10.1590/S0034-759020190403 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 2012, Small business innovation: firm level evidence from Sweden, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37, 732, 10.1007/s10961-011-9216-9 · DOI
  9. 2021, Have we oversold the silicon valley model of entrepreneurship?, Small Business Economics, 56, 849, 10.1007/s11187-019-00272-4 · DOI
  10. 2012, Entrepreneurship and innovation: public policy frameworks, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37, 1, 10.1007/s10961-011-9240-9 · DOI
  11. 2019, Entrepreneurship and knowledge spillovers from the public sector, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15, 195, 10.1007/s11365-018-0538-z · DOI
  12. 2016, Dynamic entrepreneurship and technology-based innovation, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 26, 603, 10.1007/s00191-016-0458-4 · DOI
  13. 2020, Innovative start-ups and policy initiatives, Research Policy, 49, 104027, 10.1016/j.respol.2020.104027 · DOI
  14. 2016, Retaining winners: can policy boost high-growth entrepreneurship?, Research Policy, 45, 42, 10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.002 · DOI
  15. 2017, Impact of public seed-funding on academic spin-offs, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 1100, 10.1007/s10961-016-9476-5 · DOI
  16. 2003, Improvising firms: bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process, Research Policy, 32
  17. 2021, Mapping the “valley of death”: managing selection and technology advancement in NASA’S small business innovation research program, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68, 1476, 10.1109/TEM.2019.2904441 · DOI
  18. 2006, Dynamic capabilities in early-phase entrepreneurship, Knowledge and Process Management, 13, 162, 10.1002/kpm.255 · DOI
  19. 2018, Growth factors of research-based spin-offs and the role of venture capital investing, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43, 1375, 10.1007/s10961-017-9635-3 · DOI
  20. 2019, Public Research and Innovative Entrepreneurship: Preliminary Cross-Country Evidence from Micro Data, 10.1787/0d057da7-en · DOI
  21. 2012, Corporate effectuation: entrepreneurial action and its impact on R&D project performance, Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 167, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.01.001 · DOI
  22. 2014, Inside the high-tech black box: a critique of technology entrepreneurship policy, Technovation, 34, 773, 10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.013 · DOI
  23. 2018, How strategic knowledge management drives intellectual capital to superior innovation and market performance, Journal of Knowledge Management, 22, 621, 10.1108/JKM-07-2017-0309 · DOI
  24. 2016, Managerial perceptions of barriers to internationalization: an examination of Brazil’s new technology-based firms, Journal of Business Research, 69, 1973, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.143 · DOI
  25. 2019, Ambidextrous workforces for managing market turbulence, Career Development International, 24, 491, 10.1108/CDI-10-2018-0265 · DOI
  26. 2021, Knowledge hiding in socioeconomic settings: matching organizational and environmental antecedents, Journal of Business Research, 135, 19, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.06.012 · DOI
  27. 2014, Clusters of entrepreneurship and innovation, Innovation Policy and the Economy, 14, 129, 10.1086/674023 · DOI
  28. 2022, Rethinking companies’ culture through knowledge management lens during industry 5.0 transition, Journal of Knowledge Management, 26, 2485, 10.1108/JKM-09-2021-0718 · DOI
  29. 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
  30. 2020, To what extent do young innovative companies take advantage of policy support to enact innovation appropriation mechanisms?, Research Policy, 49, 103797, 10.1016/j.respol.2019.05.006 · DOI
  31. 2010, Dynamics of science-based entrepreneurship, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, 1, 10.1007/s10961-009-9114-6 · DOI
  32. 2011, R&D subsidies and the performance of high-tech start-ups, Economics Letters, 112, 97, 10.1016/j.econlet.2011.03.007 · DOI
  33. 2016, You can lead a firm to R&D but can you make it innovate? UK evidence from SMEs, Small Business Economics, 46, 565, 10.1007/s11187-016-9704-2 · DOI
  34. 2021, Latent technology as an outcome of R&D, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120371 · DOI
  35. 2013, Young innovative companies: the new high-growth firms?, Industrial and Corporate Change, 22, 1315, 10.1093/icc/dts039 · DOI
  36. 2001, The role of R&D intensity, technical development and absorptive capacity in creating entrepreneurial wealth in high technology start-ups, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 18
  37. 2017, Global knowledge intensive enterprises and international technology transfer: emerging perspectives from a quadruple helix environment, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 229, 10.1007/s10961-016-9496-1 · DOI
  38. 2022, Guest editorial: emerging challenges in international marketing knowledge management, International Marketing Review, 39, 10.1108/IMR-05-2022-389 · DOI
  39. 2006, Knowledge management at SMEs: five peculiarities, Journal of Knowledge Management, 10, 32, 10.1108/13673270610650085 · DOI
  40. 2021, The role of external embeddedness and knowledge management as antecedents of ambidexterity and performances in Italian SMEs, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68, 360, 10.1109/TEM.2019.2916378 · DOI
  41. 1983, The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields, American Sociological Review, 48, 147, 10.2307/2095101 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 2009, Statistical power analyses using G*power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses, Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149, 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 2005, Creating a cluster while building a firm: entrepreneurs and the formation of industrial clusters, Regional Studies, 39, 129, 10.1080/0034340052000320888 · DOI
  44. 2020, Strategic knowledge management: theory, practice and future challenges, Journal of Knowledge Management, 24, 121, 10.1108/JKM-07-2018-0461 · DOI
  45. 2023, Are public subsidies effective for university spinoffs? Evidence from SBIR awards in the university of California system, Research Policy, 52, 104662, 10.1016/j.respol.2022.104662 · DOI
  46. 2019, Universities’ institutional settings and academic entrepreneurship: notes from a developing country, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 147, 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.07.009 · DOI
  47. 2018, On the location of knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship in developing countries: lessons from São Paulo, Brazil, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 30, 10.1080/08985626.2018.1438523 · DOI
  48. 2019, Evolution of university-industry collaboration in Brazil from a technology upgrading perspective, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 330, 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.001 · DOI
  49. 2022, Performance drivers in knowledge-intensive entrepreneurial firms: a multidimensional perspective, Journal of Knowledge Management, 26, 1342, 10.1108/JKM-03-2021-0264 · DOI
  50. 2018, Quality comes first: university-industry collaboration as a source of academic entrepreneurship in a developing country, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43, 263, 10.1007/s10961-017-9568-x · DOI
  51. 2012, Effectuation, causation, and bricolage: a behavioral comparison of emerging theories in entrepreneurship research, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 1019, 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00537.x · DOI
  52. 2011, Building better causal theories: a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research, source, Academy of Management Journal, 54
  53. 2017, How do entrepreneurs think they create value? A scientific reflection of Eric Ries’ lean startup approach, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13, 169, 10.1007/s11365-016-0411-x · DOI
  54. 2017, Learning styles of entrepreneurs in knowledge-intensive industries, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23, 446, 10.1108/IJEBR-12-2015-0307 · DOI
  55. 2016, On the economic performance of nascent entrepreneurs, European Economic Review, 86, 109, 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.07.018 · DOI
  56. 2022, Helping the little guy: the impact of government awards on small technology firms, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 47, 846, 10.1007/s10961-021-09859-0 · DOI
  57. 2020, Unpacking liabilities of newness and smallness in innovative start-ups: investigating the differences in innovation performance between new and older small firms, Research Policy, 49, 104049, 10.1016/j.respol.2020.104049 · DOI
  58. 2008, Using qualitative comparative analysis in strategic management research: an examination of combinations of industry, corporate, and business-unit effects, Organizational Research Methods, 11, 695, 10.1177/1094428107302907 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 2014, Creating and sustaining knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship * managing knowledge intensive entrepreneurship by MaureenMcKelvey and Astrid Heidemann Lassen, Science and Public Policy, 41, 137, 10.1093/scipol/sct081 · DOI
  60. 2019, Innovation practices in emerging economies: do university partnerships matter?, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 615, 10.1007/s10961-017-9578-8 · DOI
  61. 2019, How do scientists contribute to the performance of innovative start-ups? An imprinting perspective on open innovation, Journal of Management Studies, 56, 895, 10.1111/joms.12418 · DOI
  62. 2022, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM)
  63. 2016, Knowledge management and business performance: global experts’ views on future research needs, Journal of Knowledge Management, 20, 1169, 10.1108/JKM-12-2015-0521 · DOI
  64. 2020, Start-up subsidies: does the policy instrument matter?, Research Policy, 49, 10.1016/j.respol.2019.103888 · DOI
  65. 2020, Entrepreneurship policy and systemic conditions: evidence-based implications and recommendations for emerging countries, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 72, 100872, 10.1016/j.seps.2020.100872 · DOI
  66. 2012, All the right moves: how entrepreneurial firms compete effectively, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6, 116, 10.1002/sej.1130 · DOI
  67. 2019, Organizational ambidexterity through global strategic partnerships: a cognitive computing perspective, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 43, 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.027 · DOI
  68. 2022, Customer knowledge hiding behavior in service multi-sided platforms, Journal of Business Research, 140, 482, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.017 · DOI
  69. 2018, Strategic knowledge management and evolving local government, Journal of Knowledge Management, 22, 219, 10.1108/JKM-06-2017-0232 · DOI
  70. 2021, Do public R&D subsidies produce jobs? Evidence from the SBIR/STTR program, Research Policy, 50, 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104286 · DOI
  71. 1999, The government as venture capitalist: the long-run impact of the SBIR program, The Journal of Business, 72, 285, 10.1086/209616 · DOI
  72. 2002, When bureaucrats meet entrepreneurs: the design of effective `public venture capital’ programmes, The Economic Journal, 112, F73, 10.1111/1468-0297.00684 · DOI
  73. 2009, Bringing science to market: commercializing from NIH SBIR awards, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 18, 381, 10.1080/10438590802208166 · DOI
  74. 2022, The coevolution of innovation ecosystems and the strategic growth paths of knowledge-intensive enterprises: the case of China’s integrated circuit design industry, Journal of Business Research, 144, 428, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.008 · DOI
  75. 2005, The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: managerial and policy implications, Research Policy, 34, 981, 10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.010 · DOI
  76. 1977, A general contingency theory of management, The Academy of Management Review, 2, 181, 10.2307/257902 · DOI
  77. 2008, Factors influencing the establishment of knowledge-intensive ventures, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 14, 70, 10.1108/13552550810863062 · DOI
  78. 2023, Internationalized knowledge-intensive business service (KIBS) for servitization: a microfoundation perspective, International Marketing Review, 1, 10.1108/IMR-12-2021-0366 · DOI
  79. 2020, Knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship integrating Schumpeter, evolutionary economics, and innovation systems, Small Business Economics, 54, 503, 10.1007/s11187-018-0060-2 · DOI
  80. 2020, Use of knowledge management systems: analysis of the strategies of Brazilian small and medium enterprises, Journal of Knowledge Management, 24, 369, 10.1108/JKM-06-2019-0334 · DOI
  81. 2019, A measure of enterprises’ innovative activity for microfirms and startups, Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 18, 1
  82. 2003, Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? Research-based ventures and public support mechanisms, R and D Management, 33, 107, 10.1111/1467-9310.00286 · DOI
  83. 2014, Substitutes or complements? A configurational examination of corporate governance mechanisms, Academy of Management Journal, 57, 1681, 10.5465/amj.2012.0728 · DOI · Paper page
  84. 2019, High-Tech entrepreneurship in developing countries: way to success, Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 25
  85. 2004, The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: sharing the laboratory life, Research Policy, 33, 643, 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.013 · DOI
  86. 2019, Startups and technology transfer from universities and research centers—an analysis of the impact on launching new products, 17, 10.1007/978-3-030-10865-6_2 · DOI
  87. 2020, Knowledge management, intellectual capital and entrepreneurship: a structured literature review, Journal of Knowledge Management, 24, 1797, 10.1108/JKM-01-2020-0052 · DOI
  88. 2021, Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA): guidelines for research practice in information systems and marketing, International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102310, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102310 · DOI · Paper page
  89. 2017, Determinants of young firms’ innovative performance: empirical evidence from Europe, Research Policy, 46, 1312, 10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.011 · DOI
  90. 1987, The Comparative Method: moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies
  91. 2008, Redesigning Social Inquiry: Set Relations in Social Research
  92. 2012, Topologies of innovation networks in knowledge-intensive sectors: sectoral differences in the access to knowledge and complementary assets through formal and informal ties, Technovation, 32, 380, 10.1016/j.technovation.2012.02.003 · DOI
  93. 2022, Acknowledging diversity in knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship: assessing the Brazilian small business innovation research, Journal of Technology Transfer, 48, 10.1007/s10961-022-09976-4 · DOI
  94. 2013, The interplay of human and social capital in shaping entrepreneurial performance: the case of Vietnam, Small Business Economics, 40, 435, 10.1007/s11187-012-9427-y · DOI
  95. 2001, Causation and effectuation: toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency, source, The Academy of Management Review, 26
  96. 2021, Mutualism in ecosystems of innovation and entrepreneurship: a bidirectional perspective on universities’ linkages, Journal of Business Research, 134, 184, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.039 · DOI
  97. 2010, Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets, Comparative Sociology, 9, 397, 10.1163/156913210X12493538729793 · DOI · Paper page
  98. 2017, The effect of social networking sites and absorptive capacity on SMES’ innovation performance, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 409, 10.1007/s10961-016-9517-0 · DOI
  99. 2017, Entrepreneurial learning dynamics in knowledge-intensive enterprises, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23, 366, 10.1108/IJEBR-01-2017-0020 · DOI
  100. 2009, Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy, Small Business Economics, 33, 141, 10.1007/s11187-009-9215-5 · DOI
  101. 2012, Universities and the success of entrepreneurial ventures: evidence from the small business innovation research program, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37, 404, 10.1007/s10961-010-9186-3 · DOI
  102. 2017, Non-founder human capital and the long-run growth and survival of high-tech ventures, Technovation, 59, 34, 10.1016/j.technovation.2016.09.001 · DOI
  103. 2016, The impact of university-based incubation support on the innovation strategy of academic spin-offs, Technovation, 50/51, 25, 10.1016/j.technovation.2015.11.001 · DOI
  104. 2007, How smart is smart money? A two-sided matching model of venture capital, The Journal of Finance, 62, 2725, 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01291.x · DOI
  105. 2009, The roles of R&D in new firm growth, Small Business Economics, 33, 77, 10.1007/s11187-009-9183-9 · DOI
  106. 2018, Resource orchestration in start-ups: synchronizing human capital investment, leveraging strategy, and founder start-up experience, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12, 194, 10.1002/sej.1269 · DOI
  107. 2012, Prior knowledge and new product and service introductions by entrepreneurial firms: the mediating role of technological innovation, Journal of Small Business Management, 50, 41, 10.1111/j.1540-627X.2011.00343.x · DOI
  108. 2007, Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance, Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319, 10.1002/smj.640 · DOI · Paper page
  109. 1997, Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI · Paper page
  110. 2020, How does cluster location and intellectual capital impact entrepreneurial success within high-growth firms?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22, 171, 10.1108/JIC-02-2020-0066 · DOI
  111. 2020, Endowing university spin-offs pre-formation: entrepreneurial capabilities for scientist-entrepreneurs, Technovation, 96-97, 10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102153 · DOI
  112. 2009, Exploring the relationship between scientist human capital and firm performance: the case of biomedical academic entrepreneurs in the sbir program, Management Science, 55, 101, 10.1287/mnsc.1080.0913 · DOI
  113. 2019, Gimme shelter or fade away: the impact of regional entrepreneurial ecosystem quality on venture survival, Industrial and Corporate Change, 28, 827, 10.1093/icc/dtz032 · DOI
  114. 2017, Strategic knowledge management—insights and pitfalls, International Journal of Information Management, 37, 313, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.02.002 · DOI
  115. 2018, Effectuation and causation in science-based new venture creation: a configurational approach, Journal of Business Research, 83, 173, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.041 · DOI
  116. 2017, Ambidexterity, external knowledge and performance in knowledge-intensive firms, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 374, 10.1007/s10961-016-9502-7 · DOI
  117. 2011, The effectiveness of university knowledge spillovers: performance differences between university spinoffs and corporate spinoffs, Research Policy, 40, 1128, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.014 · DOI
  118. 2020, How can open innovation ecosystem modes push product innovation forward? An fsQCA analysis, Journal of Business Research, 108, 29, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.011 · DOI
  119. 1999, Developing a knowledge strategy, California Management Review, 41, 125, 10.2307/41166000 · DOI
  120. 2006, Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: a review, model and research agenda, Journal of Management Studies, 43, 917, 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00616.x · DOI · Paper page
  121. 2020, The micro-foundations of strategic ambidexterity: Chinese cross-border M&As, Mid-View thinking and integration management, International Business Review, 29, 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101710 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Moraes, G. H. S. M. D., Fischer, B., Salles-Filho, S., Meissner, D., & Dabic, M.
Affiliations
  • National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU)
  • Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Knowledge Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2023-08-28
Volume
27
Issue
11
Pages
205-230
ISSN
1367-3270 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1108/jkm-03-2023-0267
OpenAlex
W4386182390
Cited by
16
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Journal of Knowledge Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Sveučilište u Zagrebu
  • Strong
  • European Commission (HORIZON2020)
  • National Research University Higher School of Economics (5‐100)
  • Univerza v Ljubljani
  • Interreg
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
Keywords
knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship, firm performance, scientific capabilities, strategic R&D, R&D capability, human capital, configurational analysis, equifinal configurations, entrepreneurial firms, entrepreneurship policy, small business

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review