Cited by 354Digital Economy and Work TransformationLegal and Labor StudiesJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Gig-workers’ motivation: thinking beyond carrots and sticks

Jabagi, Nura, Croteau, Anne-Marie, Audebrand, Luc K., Marsan, Josianne·2019·Journal of Managerial Psychology

Abstract

Purpose High-quality employee motivation can contribute to an organization’s long-term success by supporting employees’ well-being and performance. Nevertheless, there is a paucity of research concerning how organizations motivate workers in non-traditional work contexts. In the algocratic context of the gig-economy, the purpose of this paper is to understand the role that technology can play in motivating workers. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on the self-determination theory, job-characteristic theory and enterprise social media research, this conceptual paper explores how the architecture of the digital labor platforms underlying the gig-economy (and the characteristics of jobs mediated through these IT artifacts) can impact key antecedents of self-motivation. Findings Combining theory and empirical evidence, this paper develops a mid-range theory demonstrating how organizations can support the self-motivation of gig-workers through the thoughtful design of their digital labor platforms and the integration of two social media tools (namely, social networking and social badging). Research limitations/implications This paper answers calls for psychologically-based research exploring the consequences of gig-work as well as research studying the impacts of advanced technologies in interaction with work contexts on motivation. In theorizing around a large set of social-contextual variables operating at different levels of analysis, this paper demonstrates that individual-…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/jmp-06-2018-0255

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jabagi, N., Croteau, A.-M., Audebrand, L. K., & Marsan, J.
Affiliations
  • Concordia University (CA)
  • Université Laval (CA)
Venue
Journal of Managerial Psychology
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2019-05-13
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
192-213
ISSN
0268-3946 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2917527157
Cited by
354
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 3
FWCI
53.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Managerial Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Corpus Université Laval (Université Laval) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
gig work, employee motivation, self-motivation, gig economy, online labour platforms, self-determination theory, job characteristics model, social networking, enterprise social media, platform work, employee well-being, non-traditional work

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review