Servant leadership and engagement: a dual mediation model
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to compare two mediating mechanisms of servant leadership’s effect on followers’ work engagement: the social exchange mechanism (represented by leader-member exchange (LMX)) and the social learning mechanism (represented by public service motivation in Study 1 and prosocial motivation in Study 2). Design/methodology/approach: In Study 1, the authors collected two-wave matched data from 216 public sector employees. In Study 2, the authors collected two-wave matched data from 178 private sector employees. The authors use hierarchical regression and bootstrapping to test the hypotheses. Findings: Servant leadership is positively related to follower’s work engagement and this relationship is mediated by LMX, but not by public service motivation (Study 1) or prosocial motivation (Study 2). It suggests that servant leadership promotes followers’ work engagement mostly through the social exchange mechanism. Research limitations/implications: The data were collected from Chinese employees, and future studies are necessary to verify the findings in other cultural contexts. Originality/value: This study sheds light on a more nuanced picture of the effect mechanisms of servant leadership.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior literature linked servant leadership effects to employee engagement.
“Servant leadership effects had already been linked to employee engagement by previous literature (Bao et al., 2018;Carter & Baghurst, 2013;De Clercq et al., 2014).”
From Servant Leadership and Employee Engagement: A Qualitative Study (2022) · cites this paper as Bao et al., 2018
Employee engagement is positively influenced by servant leadership through various drivers.
“Additionally, several themes were identified revealing that employee engagement is positively influenced by servant leadership through various drivers, as supported by other studies (Bao et al., 2018;Carter & Baghurst, 2013;De Clercq et al., 2014;McNeff & Irving, 2017).”
From Servant Leadership and Employee Engagement: A Qualitative Study (2022) · cites this paper as Bao et al., 2018
Cites
Servant Leadership: A Review and Synthesis
van Dierendonck, D. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310380462 · Cited by 2,218 · see citing works
Hoch, J. E., Bommer, W. H., Dulebohn, J. H., & Wu, D. (2018) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206316665461 · Cited by 1,364 · see citing works
Crafting a job on a daily basis: Contextual correlates and the link to work engagement
Petrou, P., Demerouti, E., Peeters, M. C. W., Schaufeli, W. B., & Hetland, J. (2012) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1783 · Cited by 1,026 · see citing works
Walumbwa, F. O., Hartnell, C. A., & Oke, A. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0018867 · Cited by 940 · see citing works
Chiniara, M., & Bentein, K. (2016) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.08.004 · Cited by 544 · see citing works
van Dierendonck, D., Stam, D., Boersma, P., de Windt, N., & Alkema, J. (2014) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.014 · Cited by 525 · see citing works
Chen, Z., Zhu, J., & Zhou, M. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0038036 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Servant leadership and follower job performance: The mediating effect of public service motivation
SCHWARZ, G., NEWMAN, A., COOPER, B., & EVA, N. (2016) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12266 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
The influence of servant leadership on restaurant employee engagement
Carter, D., & Baghurst, T. (2014) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1882-0 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Servant Leadership and Employee Engagement: A Qualitative Study
Canavesi, A., & Minelli, E. (2022) · Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal · doi:10.1007/s10672-021-09389-9 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
“Additionally, several themes were identified revealing that employee engagement is positively influenced by servant leadership through various drivers, as supported by other studies (Bao et al., 2018; Carter & Baghurst, 2013; De Clercq et al., 2014; McNeff & Irving, 2017).”
BackgroundResultLinking servant leadership to follower emotional exhaustion through impression management
Peng, A. C., Gao, R., & Wang, B. (2023) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2682 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bao, Y., Li, C., & Zhao, H.
- Affiliations
- Renmin University of China (CN)
- Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Managerial Psychology
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2018-10-02
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 406-417
- ISSN
- 0268-3946 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2894708474
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 9.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Managerial Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
- Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
- Keywords
- servant leadership, work engagement, leader-member exchange, social exchange, public service motivation, prosocial motivation, social learning, dual mediation, public sector employees, private sector employees
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review