Cited by 80Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEmployee Performance and ManagementWorkplace Spirituality and Leadership

Servant leadership and engagement: a dual mediation model

Bao, Yuanjie, Li, Chaoping, Zhao, Hao·2018·Journal of Managerial Psychology

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to compare two mediating mechanisms of servant leadership’s effect on followers’ work engagement: the social exchange mechanism (represented by leader-member exchange (LMX)) and the social learning mechanism (represented by public service motivation in Study 1 and prosocial motivation in Study 2). Design/methodology/approach: In Study 1, the authors collected two-wave matched data from 216 public sector employees. In Study 2, the authors collected two-wave matched data from 178 private sector employees. The authors use hierarchical regression and bootstrapping to test the hypotheses. Findings: Servant leadership is positively related to follower’s work engagement and this relationship is mediated by LMX, but not by public service motivation (Study 1) or prosocial motivation (Study 2). It suggests that servant leadership promotes followers’ work engagement mostly through the social exchange mechanism. Research limitations/implications: The data were collected from Chinese employees, and future studies are necessary to verify the findings in other cultural contexts. Originality/value: This study sheds light on a more nuanced picture of the effect mechanisms of servant leadership.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/jmp-12-2017-0435

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior literature linked servant leadership effects to employee engagement.

    “Servant leadership effects had already been linked to employee engagement by previous literature (Bao et al., 2018;Carter & Baghurst, 2013;De Clercq et al., 2014).”

    From Servant Leadership and Employee Engagement: A Qualitative Study (2022) · cites this paper as Bao et al., 2018

  • Employee engagement is positively influenced by servant leadership through various drivers.

    “Additionally, several themes were identified revealing that employee engagement is positively influenced by servant leadership through various drivers, as supported by other studies (Bao et al., 2018;Carter & Baghurst, 2013;De Clercq et al., 2014;McNeff & Irving, 2017).”

    From Servant Leadership and Employee Engagement: A Qualitative Study (2022) · cites this paper as Bao et al., 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bao, Y., Li, C., & Zhao, H.
Affiliations
  • Renmin University of China (CN)
  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
Venue
Journal of Managerial Psychology
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2018-10-02
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
406-417
ISSN
0268-3946 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2894708474
Cited by
80
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3
FWCI
9.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Managerial Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
Keywords
servant leadership, work engagement, leader-member exchange, social exchange, public service motivation, prosocial motivation, social learning, dual mediation, public sector employees, private sector employees

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review