Cited by 544Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsEmployee Performance and Management

Linking servant leadership to individual performance: Differentiating the mediating role of autonomy, competence and relatedness need satisfaction

Chiniara, Myriam, Bentein, Kathleen·2016·The Leadership Quarterly

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.08.004

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The review found 23 published articles based on multi-level data and 10 articles that aggregate and analyze data at the team level.

    “Our review also found 23 published articles based on multi-level data (e.g.Chiniara & Bentein, 2016;Neubert et al., 2016), and 10 articles which aggregate and analyze the data at the team level (e.g.Hu & Liden, 2011;Schaubroeck et al., 2011).”

    From Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research (2019) · cites this paper as Chiniara & Bentein, 2016

  • At the team level, servant leadership has been linked with team-level OCB, task-focused and person-focused OCB, service-oriented OCB, and helping and conscientiousness-focused OCB.

    “At the team level, servant leadership has been linked with teamlevel OCB (Hu & Liden, 2011), task-focused and person-focused OCB (Hunter et al., 2013), service-oriented OCB (Chiniara & Bentein, 2016), as well as helping and conscientiousness-focused OCB (Ehrhart, 2004).”

    From Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research (2019) · cites this paper as Chiniara & Bentein, 2016

  • Self-determination theory (SDT) has been utilized by servant leadership scholars to examine how servant leaders fulfill their followers' needs.

    “Self-determination theory (SDT) has been utilized by servant leadership scholars to examine how servant leaders fulfill their followers' needs (i.e.Chiniara & Bentein, 2016;van Dierendonck et al., 2014).”

    From Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research (2019) · cites this paper as Chiniara & Bentein, 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 117 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chiniara, M., & Bentein, K.
Affiliations
Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Chiniara, Myriam
  • Bentein, Kathleen
Venue
The Leadership Quarterly
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
124-141
ISSN
1048-9843 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1818192987
Cited by
544
References
117
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 7
FWCI
47.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Leadership Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
Keywords
servant leadership, individual performance, task performance, organizational citizenship behavior, basic psychological needs, autonomy need satisfaction, competence need satisfaction, relatedness need satisfaction, self-determination theory, mediating effect, employee development, supervisor-subordinate dyads

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review