CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 293Public Procurement and PolicyE-Government and Public ServicesE-commerce and Technology Innovations

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Critical factors that influence e-procurement implementation success in the public sector

Open access
Vaidya, Kishor, Sajeev, A. S. M., Callender, Guy·2006·Journal of Public Procurement
DOI 10.1108/jopp-06-01-02-2006-b004
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a literature survey developed to support a proposed model of the Critical Success Factors (CSFs) likely to impact the success of e-Procurement initiatives in the public sector. It identifies a number of relevant variables for each CSF and presents a model for future research. It also analyses the relative importance of different CSFs and observes that organization and management factors are the most important category for success of e-Procurement initiatives. If e-Procurement initiatives in the public sector are to assist the development of e-Procurement across the information economy, there should be wider discussion and agreement on what constitutes the relevant CSFs and how the achievement of success can be assessed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/jopp-06-01-02-2006-b004

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Auditor General Victoria, 2003, Electronic Procurement in the Victorian Government
  2. Consulting, 2003, Review of the GEM Purchasing E-Procurement Business System. Perth
  3. Barua A., 2001, Sloan Management Review, 43, 36
  4. Bell S., 2003, Computerworld. [Online].
  5. Birks C., 2001, Guide to e-Procurement in the Public Sector: Cutting through the Hype
  6. Callender G., Proceedings of International Research Study of Public Procurement (pp. 48-61)
  7. Chan C., Proceedings of 'Bled98' - 11th International Conference on Electronic Commerce, June 8-10
  8. Consortium for Global Electronic Commerce (CGEC) (2002, October)., Measuring and Improving Value of E-procurement Initiatives
  9. Croom S., 13th International Purchasing & Supply Education & Research Association (IPSERA) Conference, April 4-7
  10. Dai Q., Thirty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, January 3-6
  11. Doesburg A., 2003, Goodbye GoProcure
  12. Department of Finance (DOF), 2001, Strategy for the Implementation of e-Procurement in the Irish Public Sector. Dublin
  13. Department of Finance and Administration (DOFA), 2002, Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines and Best Practice Guidance
  14. Department of Information Resources (DOIR), 2001, Assessment of the General Services Commission's Electronic Procurement Project
  15. ECOM Group (2002, February)., e-Procurement in the UK Public Sector: A Guide to Developments and Best Practices (A CIPFA e-Government Forum Report)
  16. Gifford A., 2003, GoProcure Project Shrinking. [On-line].
  17. Ginzberg M.J., 1979, TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences (pp. 85-102).
  18. Harris S., 2002, Governing. [On-line].
  19. Heywood J.B., 2002, e-Procurement: Managing Successful e-Procurement Implementation
  20. KableNet, 2002, US Suffers e-Procurement Setback. [On-line].
  21. KableNet, 2003, Absent without e-Savings
  22. KPMG, 2001, University of California Office of the President System-Wide E-Procurement Assessment and Strategy Recommendation
  23. Koorn R., 2001, e-Procurement and Online Marketplaces
  24. Office 0, EProcurement: Working Group Report of Findings
  25. National e-Procurement Project (NePP), 2004, Delivering e-Procurement: Guidance. [On-line].
  26. Office, 2002, Office of Government Commerce
  27. Operational Services Division (OSD), 2001, Critical Success Factors and Metrics: Enhanced Comm-Pass Initiative
  28. Rasheed H.S., 2004, Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 9, 22
  29. Ramboll, 2000, Analysis of Electronic Public Procurement Pilot Projects in the European Union. [On-line].
  30. Stenning S, 2003, Version 1.2
  31. Sekharan U., 1992, Research Methods
  32. Steinberg R., 2003, Strategies for Successful Government EProcurement. [On-line].
  33. Subramaniam C., 2002, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6, 19
  34. Tonkin C., 2004, e-Procurement in the Public Sector: Story, Myth and Legend. [On-line].
  35. Vaidya K., 2003, N. Cerpa and P. Bro (Eds.), 47
  36. World Bank, 2003, Electronic Government Procurement (e-GP): World Bank Draft Strategy
  37. Wittig W. A., 2003, Public Procurement and the Development Agenda

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 293

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Vaidya, K., Sajeev, A. S. M., & Callender, G.
Affiliations
  • University of New England (AU)
  • Curtin University (AU)
Venue
Journal of Public Procurement
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2006-03-01
Volume
6
Issue
1/2
Pages
70-99
ISSN
1535-0118 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1108/jopp-06-01-02-2006-b004
OpenAlex
W2734123735
Cited by
293
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 22
FWCI
20.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Public Procurement (publishedVersion)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
  • EPubDev Repository (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › E-commerce and Technology Innovations
Keywords
e-procurement, success factors, public sector, e-government, information economy, organizational factors, management factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review