Cited by 24AI in Service InteractionsTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourCustomer Service Quality and Loyalty

The Determinant Factors of Continuance Use of Customer Service Chatbot in Indonesia E-Commerce: Extended Expectation Confirmation Theory

Sundjaja, Arta Moro, Utomo, Prio, Colline, Fredella·2025·Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management

Abstract

Purpose The implementation of customer service chatbots in various industries is increasingly accepted globally. Previous research has not extensively explored the relationship between chatbot disclosure, technology anxiety, chatbot quality, customer experience and customer satisfaction derived from using chatbot customer service in e-commerce. Therefore, this paper aims to examine the determinant factors of customer service chatbot continuance intention by extending the expectation confirmation theory (ECT). The researchers integrate chatbot quality, technology anxiety and disclosure into ECT to comprehensively understand the phenomena. Design/methodology/approach The quantitative study uses the partial least square structural equation model disjoint two-stage approach with a sample of 310 respondents collected using purposive sampling. Findings The study reveals that perceived usefulness, confirmation and satisfaction positively affect customer service chatbot continuance intentions. Moreover, chatbot disclosure can enhance chatbot quality. However, technology anxiety negatively affects chatbot quality. Originality/value This research contributed to adapting customer service chatbots in Indonesian e-commerce, focusing on chatbot quality, technological anxiety and transparency. Furthermore, it underscores the need for clarity, addresses transaction-specific concerns and artificial intelligence-driven customer assistance in the Indonesian market.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/jstpm-04-2024-0137

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The empirical research on the effects of agentic commerce is still dispersed but suggests an interrelated set of commerce and psychological effects.

    “The empirical research on the effects of agentic commerce is still dispersed but suggests an interrelated set of commerce and psychological effects”
  • As systems move toward truly agentic, transaction-executing commerce, the main limitation is measurement: a significant portion of the evidence deduces delegation from adoption or continuation intentions, rather than from direct observation of explicit delegation choices or verified execution.

    “As systems move toward truly agentic, transaction-executing commerce [24,40,44,45,50,52,67], the main limitation is measurement: a significant portion of the evidence deduces delegation from adoption or continuation intentions, rather than from direct observation of explicit delegation choices or verified execution.”
  • Studies focusing on intention usually follow extended TAM/ECT/TPB logic, in which quality/usefulness and confirmation lead to higher satisfaction and/or attitudes, which then predict continued use, purchase intention, or loyalty.

    “Studies that focus on intention usually follow the extended TAM/ECT/TPB logic, which says that quality/usefulness and confirmation lead to higher satisfaction and/or attitudes, which then predict outcomes like continued use, purchase intention, or loyalty”
  • Systems designed to minimize friction augment perceived utility and user satisfaction, thereby reinforcing trust and subsequent intention outcomes.

    “Systems designed to minimize friction (e.g., expedited information access, simplified input, structured guidance, enhanced navigation) augment perceived utility and user satisfaction, thereby reinforcing trust and subsequent intention outcomes (e.g., retention, purchase intention, reliance-oriented metrics) [6,44,45,48,50,52,67,69].”
  • The net-positive pattern is evident in dominant satisfaction/continuance pathways according to numerous studies.

    “According to numerous studies [44,46,48,50,69], this pattern is evident in dominant satisfaction/continuance pathways.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Sundjaja, A. M., Utomo, P., & Colline, F.
Affiliations
  • Binus University (ID)
  • Multimedia Nusantara University (ID)
  • Krida Wacana Christian University (ID)
Corresponding author
Sundjaja, Arta Moro
Venue
Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2024-10-22
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
182-203
ISSN
  • 2053-4620 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-4639
OpenAlex
W4403544019
Cited by
24
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
Keywords
customer service chatbots, continuance intention, expectation confirmation theory, technology anxiety, perceived usefulness, customer satisfaction, customer experience, e-commerce, Indonesian e-commerce

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review