The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Can generational differences and feeling trusted improve knowledge-sharing behavior? Consequences of high-performance work systems
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to investigate the relationships between high-performance work systems (HPWS) on knowledge-sharing behavior (KSB) among Indonesian employees through the mediating role of feeling trusted (FT) and moderating role of generational differences (GD). Design/methodology/approach: Sample were collected from 278 employees working in the Indonesian financial companies. This research used structural equation modeling to investigate the associations of HPWS and KSB. Furthermore, Sobel Test was applicated to test the mediation effect of FT. Finally, Hayes PROCESS was used to test the moderation impact of GD. Findings: The empirical results revealed that HPWS positively impact FT and KSB. Hereafter, FT also positively impacts KSB and then succeeds to mediate the relationships between HPWS and KSB. Finally, GD were failed to moderate the relationships between HPWS and KSB. Originality/value: To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is one of the few studies that illustrate the roles of GD between the relationships between HPWS and KSB.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Retracted: Critical Human Factor Evaluation of Knowledge Sharing Intention in Taiwanese Enterprises
Chen, C., Chang, M., Tseng, C., Chen, B., & Chang, Y. Y. (2012) · Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries · doi:10.1002/hfm.20300 · Cited by 58
RetractedEvaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
(2014) · Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107415324.004 · Cited by 23,880
SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03206553 · Cited by 17,383
HUSELID, M. A. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256741 · Cited by 9,342
Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice.
Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611 · Cited by 3,550
Preston, C. C., & Colman, A. M. (2000) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/s0001-6918(99)00050-5 · Cited by 2,106
Aryee, S., Budhwar, P. S., & Chen, Z. X. (2002) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.138 · Cited by 1,819
Hsu, M.-H., Ju, T. L., Yen, C.-H., & Chang, C.-M. (2007) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.09.003 · Cited by 1,504
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- 1998, High performance work systems and firm performance: a synthesis of research and, Personnel, 16, 53
- 1985, Theory and Implementation of EQS; a Structural Equations Program
- 2010, The effect of firm compensation structures on the mobility and entrepreneurship of extreme performers, Business, 456, 1, 10.1002/smj · DOI
- 1998, Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling, MIS Quarterly, 22, vii
- 2019, Generasi milenial dalam bagi sumber daya manusia Indonesia atau ancaman, Generasi Milenial Dalam Industri 4.0: Berkah Bagi Sumber Daya Manusia Indonesia Atau Ancaman, 25
- 2017, Introduction to mediation
- 1993, Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language
- 2008, The Perceived Effect of Trust as It Relates to Knowledge Transfer between Multigenerational Employees
- 1995, The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation
- 2010, Place-based trends and approaches to regional development: global trends and australian implications
- 1997, Academy of management alternative approaches to the employee-organization relationship: does investment in employee-organization relationship: does investment in employees pay off?, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, 40, 1089
Cited by
Still being checked.
Metadata
- Authors
- Almadana, A. V., Suharnomo, S., & Perdhana, M. S.
- Affiliations
- Diponegoro University (ID)
- Venue
- Journal of Workplace Learning
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2021-09-22
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 200-214
- ISSN
- 1366-5626 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3200316073
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 2.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Workplace Learning (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Knowledge Management and Sharing
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Keywords
- high-performance work systems, knowledge sharing behavior, generational differences, mediating effect, moderating effect, employee trust, financial companies, Indonesian workers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Can generational differences and feeling trusted improve knowledge-sharing behavior? Consequences of high-performance work systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/jwl-05-2021-0058
- The paper
- Almadana, A. V., Suharnomo, S., & Perdhana, M. S. (2022). Can generational differences and feeling trusted improve knowledge-sharing behavior? Consequences of high-performance work systems. Journal of Workplace Learning. https://doi.org/10.1108/jwl-05-2021-0058
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
