Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 14Knowledge Management and SharingJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorTeam Dynamics and Performance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Can generational differences and feeling trusted improve knowledge-sharing behavior? Consequences of high-performance work systems

Almadana, Aulia Vidya, Suharnomo, Suharnomo, Perdhana, Mirwan Surya·2022·Journal of Workplace Learning
DOI 10.1108/jwl-05-2021-0058
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the relationships between high-performance work systems (HPWS) on knowledge-sharing behavior (KSB) among Indonesian employees through the mediating role of feeling trusted (FT) and moderating role of generational differences (GD). Design/methodology/approach: Sample were collected from 278 employees working in the Indonesian financial companies. This research used structural equation modeling to investigate the associations of HPWS and KSB. Furthermore, Sobel Test was applicated to test the mediation effect of FT. Finally, Hayes PROCESS was used to test the moderation impact of GD. Findings: The empirical results revealed that HPWS positively impact FT and KSB. Hereafter, FT also positively impacts KSB and then succeeds to mediate the relationships between HPWS and KSB. Finally, GD were failed to moderate the relationships between HPWS and KSB. Originality/value: To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is one of the few studies that illustrate the roles of GD between the relationships between HPWS and KSB.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/jwl-05-2021-0058

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 1998, High performance work systems and firm performance: a synthesis of research and, Personnel, 16, 53
  2. 1985, Theory and Implementation of EQS; a Structural Equations Program
  3. 2010, The effect of firm compensation structures on the mobility and entrepreneurship of extreme performers, Business, 456, 1, 10.1002/smj · DOI
  4. 1998, Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling, MIS Quarterly, 22, vii
  5. 2019, Generasi milenial dalam bagi sumber daya manusia Indonesia atau ancaman, Generasi Milenial Dalam Industri 4.0: Berkah Bagi Sumber Daya Manusia Indonesia Atau Ancaman, 25
  6. 2017, Introduction to mediation
  7. 1993, Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language
  8. 2008, The Perceived Effect of Trust as It Relates to Knowledge Transfer between Multigenerational Employees
  9. 1995, The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation
  10. 2010, Place-based trends and approaches to regional development: global trends and australian implications
  11. 1997, Academy of management alternative approaches to the employee-organization relationship: does investment in employee-organization relationship: does investment in employees pay off?, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, 40, 1089

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Almadana, A. V., Suharnomo, S., & Perdhana, M. S.
Affiliations
Diponegoro University (ID)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Workplace Learning
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2021-09-22
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
200-214
ISSN
1366-5626 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1108/jwl-05-2021-0058
OpenAlex
W3200316073
Cited by
14
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Workplace Learning (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Keywords
high-performance work systems, knowledge sharing behavior, generational differences, mediating effect, moderating effect, employee trust, financial companies, Indonesian workers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.