The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A blockchain-based solution for transparent intellectual property rights management: smart contracts as enablers
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to address the limitations of traditional methods for managing intellectual property rights (IPRs) by proposing a blockchain-based solution. By leveraging blockchain technology and smart contracts, the aim is to create a comprehensive ecosystem that offers advantages such as reduced transaction costs, improved transparency, enhanced security and increased liquidity levels for IP assets. Design/methodology/approach: This paper proposes using blockchain technology to manage intellectual property rights (IPRs) through a smart contract-based ecosystem. It outlines the use of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) on the blockchain to represent IPRs, with smart contracts automating interactions and encoding rules for various processes such as applications, licensing, transfers and royalty distribution. Governance mechanisms, such as decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), are employed to allow stakeholders to propose and vote on contract changes, ensuring adaptability. This approach aims to streamline IPR workflows, reduce transaction costs, improve transparency and enhance security. Findings: The findings of this study suggest that implementing a blockchain-based ecosystem for managing intellectual property rights (IPRs) can lead to various benefits. These include reduced transaction costs, improved transparency, enhanced security, increased liquidity levels for IP assets and streamlined automated processes. The use of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) on the blockchain allows for detailed management, valuation and trading of IPRs. Furthermore, simulation results demonstrate the robustness and efficiency of our proposed ecosystem, outperforming traditional IP management systems in terms of transaction speed and cost-effectiveness. These simulations highlight the practical viability of integrating blockchain technology into IP management workflows. Practical implications: The practical implications of adopting this blockchain-based ecosystem for managing intellectual property rights (IPRs) are significant. By streamlining processes, reducing transaction costs and improving transparency and security, organizations can expedite the protection and commercialization of their IP assets. Additionally, the increased liquidity levels and accessibility of IP assets to investors and financiers can spur innovation and economic growth. Originality/value: This paper contributes to the field by proposing a novel approach to managing intellectual property rights (IPRs) using blockchain technology and smart contracts. By leveraging non-fungible tokens (NFTs) on the blockchain, the proposed ecosystem offers a more efficient and transparent way of managing IPRs, reducing reliance on costly and opaque traditional methods. The potential benefits include improved efficiency, transparency, security and collaboration in the management and commercialization of IPRs.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash SystemPreprint
Squarepants, S. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3977007 · Cited by 11,146
MedRec: Using Blockchain for Medical Data Access and Permission Management
Azaria, A., Ekblaw, A., Vieira, T., & Lippman, A. (2016) · 2016 2nd International Conference on Open and Big Data (OBD) · doi:10.1109/obd.2016.11 · Cited by 2,526
A system failure framework for innovation policy design
Woolthuis, R. J. A. K., Lankhuizen, M. B. M., & Gilsing, V. A. (2004) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.002 · Cited by 934
When Intrusion Detection Meets Blockchain Technology: A Review
Meng, W., Tischhauser, E., Wang, Q., Wang, Y., & Han, J. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2799854 · Cited by 528
Friedman, N., & Ormiston, J. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121403 · Cited by 425
Edquist, C. (2011) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtr060 · Cited by 403
Trustworthy Blockchain Oracles: Review, Comparison, and Open Research Challenges
Breiki, H. A., Rehman, M. H. U., Salah, K., & Svetinović, D. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2992698 · Cited by 376
The All-Pervasiveness of the Blockchain Technology
Efanov, D., & Roschin, P. (2018) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2018.01.019 · Cited by 351
Patents and intellectual property assets as non-fungible tokens; key technologies and challenges
Bamakan, S. M. H., Nezhadsistani, N., Bodaghi, O., & Qu, Q. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-05920-6 · Cited by 336
Blockchain technology and startup financing: A transaction cost economics perspective
Ahluwalia, S., Mahto, R. V., & Guerrero, M. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119854 · Cited by 327
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Mougayar, 2016, The Business Blockchain : Promise, Practice, and Application of the Next Internet Technology
- Nguyen, 2023, Law PMP of L at U of WS of. Blockchain games and a disruptive corporate business model, Stanford Journal of Blockchain Law and Policy
- Samuelson, 2010, Cpp M of T. The copyright principles project: directions for reform, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 25, 1175
Cited by
Enforcement of smart contracts in cross-jurisdictional transactions
Atiyah, G. A., Ibrahim, A. I., & Jasim, A. A. (2024) · International Journal of Law and Management · doi:10.1108/ijlma-06-2024-0220 · Cited by 14
Prioritizing interoperable AI-driven solutions for sustainable circular economy in the public sector
Alshibani, S. M., Singhal, A. B., Gupta, B., Papa, A., & Giudice, M. D. (2026) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124513 · Cited by 9
Wang, S. (2025) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/02666669251349154 · Cited by 9
The Paradox of Decentralization: NFTs, Platform Capitalism and the Tokenized Knowledge Economy
Vindigni, G. (2025) · Scientia. Technology, science and society. · doi:10.59324/stss.2025.2(11).13 · Cited by 6
Al-Humaimeedy, A. S. (2025) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi17100444 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Alqarni, A.
- Affiliations
- Jazan University (SA)
- Corresponding author
- Alqarni, Amani
- ORCID
- Alqarni, Amani
- Venue
- Kybernetes
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2024-07-31
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 7380-7407
- ISSN
- 0368-492X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-7883
- OpenAlex
- W4401175694
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 8.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Kybernetes (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Rights Management and Security
- Keywords
- intellectual property management, blockchain, smart contracts, non-fungible tokens, decentralized autonomous organizations, intellectual property licensing, royalty distribution, transaction costs, transparency, intellectual property commercialization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review