The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A blockchain-based solution for transparent intellectual property rights management: smart contracts as enablers
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to address the limitations of traditional methods for managing intellectual property rights (IPRs) by proposing a blockchain-based solution. By leveraging blockchain technology and smart contracts, the aim is to create a comprehensive ecosystem that offers advantages such as reduced transaction costs, improved transparency, enhanced security and increased liquidity levels for IP assets. Design/methodology/approach: This paper proposes using blockchain technology to manage intellectual property rights (IPRs) through a smart contract-based ecosystem. It outlines the use of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) on the blockchain to represent IPRs, with smart contracts automating interactions and encoding rules for various processes such as applications, licensing, transfers and royalty distribution. Governance mechanisms, such as decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), are employed to allow stakeholders to propose and vote on contract changes, ensuring adaptability. This approach aims to streamline IPR workflows, reduce transaction costs, improve transparency and enhance security. Findings: The findings of this study suggest that implementing a blockchain-based ecosystem for managing intellectual property rights (IPRs) can lead to various benefits. These include reduced transaction costs, improved transparency, enhanced security, increased liquidity levels for IP assets and streamlined automated processes. The use of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) on the blockchain allows for detailed management, valuation and trading of IPRs. Furthermore, simulation results demonstrate the robustness and efficiency of our proposed ecosystem, outperforming traditional IP management systems in terms of transaction speed and cost-effectiveness. These simulations highlight the practical viability of integrating blockchain technology into IP management workflows. Practical implications: The practical implications of adopting this blockchain-based ecosystem for managing intellectual property rights (IPRs) are significant. By streamlining processes, reducing transaction costs and improving transparency and security, organizations can expedite the protection and commercialization of their IP assets. Additionally, the increased liquidity levels and accessibility of IP assets to investors and financiers can spur innovation and economic growth. Originality/value: This paper contributes to the field by proposing a novel approach to managing intellectual property rights (IPRs) using blockchain technology and smart contracts. By leveraging non-fungible tokens (NFTs) on the blockchain, the proposed ecosystem offers a more efficient and transparent way of managing IPRs, reducing reliance on costly and opaque traditional methods. The potential benefits include improved efficiency, transparency, security and collaboration in the management and commercialization of IPRs.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash SystemPreprint
Squarepants, S. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3977007 · Cited by 11,146
MedRec: Using Blockchain for Medical Data Access and Permission Management
Azaria, A., Ekblaw, A., Vieira, T., & Lippman, A. (2016) · 2016 2nd International Conference on Open and Big Data (OBD) · doi:10.1109/obd.2016.11 · Cited by 2,526
A system failure framework for innovation policy design
Woolthuis, R. J. A. K., Lankhuizen, M. B. M., & Gilsing, V. A. (2004) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.002 · Cited by 934
When Intrusion Detection Meets Blockchain Technology: A Review
Meng, W., Tischhauser, E., Wang, Q., Wang, Y., & Han, J. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2799854 · Cited by 528
Friedman, N., & Ormiston, J. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121403 · Cited by 425
Edquist, C. (2011) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtr060 · Cited by 403
Trustworthy Blockchain Oracles: Review, Comparison, and Open Research Challenges
Breiki, H. A., Rehman, M. H. U., Salah, K., & Svetinović, D. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2992698 · Cited by 376
The All-Pervasiveness of the Blockchain Technology
Efanov, D., & Roschin, P. (2018) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2018.01.019 · Cited by 351
Patents and intellectual property assets as non-fungible tokens; key technologies and challenges
Bamakan, S. M. H., Nezhadsistani, N., Bodaghi, O., & Qu, Q. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-05920-6 · Cited by 336
Blockchain technology and startup financing: A transaction cost economics perspective
Ahluwalia, S., Mahto, R. V., & Guerrero, M. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119854 · Cited by 327
O’Leary, D. E. (2017) · Intelligent systems in accounting, finance and management/Intelligent systems in accounting, finance & management · doi:10.1002/isaf.1417 · Cited by 297
Copyright in the blockchain era: Promises and challenges
Savelyev, A. (2017) · Computer law & security review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2017.11.008 · Cited by 294
Blockchain technology as a regulatory technology: from code is law to law is code
Filippi, P. D., & Hassan, S. (2016) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v21i12.7113 · Cited by 284
Glaeser, S. (2018) · Journal of Accounting & Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2018.04.002 · Cited by 243
Trends and priority shifts in artificial intelligence technology invention: A global patent analysis
Fujii, H., & Managi, S. (2018) · Economic Analysis and Policy · doi:10.1016/j.eap.2017.12.006 · Cited by 202
Yoon, J., & Kim, K. (2011) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0543-2 · Cited by 182
Using Blockchain Technology to Enhance the Traceability of Original Achievements
Zhu, P., Hu, J. G., Li, X., & Zhu, Q. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2021.3066090 · Cited by 179
The link between intellectual property rights, innovation, and growth: A meta-analysis
Neves, P. C., Afonso, Ó., Silva, D., & Sochirca, E. (2021) · Economic Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2021.01.019 · Cited by 152
A blockchain-based code copyright management system
Jing, N., Liu, Q., & Sugumaran, V. (2021) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102518 · Cited by 134
Ahmadi, E., Jasemi, M., Monplaisir, L. F., Nabavi, M.-A., Mahmoodi, A., & Jam, P. A. (2017) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.10.023 · Cited by 125
Cremers, K., Ernicke, M., Gaessler, F., Harhoff, D., Helmers, C., McDonagh, L., Schliessler, P., & van Zeebroeck, N. (2016) · European Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1007/s10657-016-9529-0 · Cited by 119
Blockchain Oracles: State-of-the-Art and Research Directions
Ezzat, S. K., Saleh, Y. N. M., & Abdel-Hamid, A. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3184726 · Cited by 112
Reliability analysis for blockchain oracles
Lo, S. K., Xu, X., Staples, M., & Yao, L. (2020) · Computers & Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2020.106582 · Cited by 104
Can Blockchain Revolutionize International Trade?
Ganne, E., & Blockchain, C. (2018) · doi:10.30875/6be0ca9c-en · Cited by 90
Ali, S., Naveed, M., Yousaf, I., & Khattak, M. S. (2023) · Finance research letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2023.104899 · Cited by 79
Ali, S., Naveed, M., Hanif, H., & Gubareva, M. (2023) · International Review of Financial Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2023.103045 · Cited by 77
Six, N., Herbaut, N., & Salinesi, C. (2022) · Blockchain Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.bcra.2022.100061 · Cited by 75
Blockchain-empowered security and privacy protection technologies for smart grid
Cao, Y.-N., Wang, Y., Ding, Y., Guo, Z., Wu, Q., & Liang, H. (2022) · Computer Standards & Interfaces · doi:10.1016/j.csi.2022.103708 · Cited by 75
Pertuzé, J. A., Reyes, T. H., Vassolo, R. S., & Olivares, N. (2019) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.103808 · Cited by 73
How can Blockchain technology support patent management? A systematic literature review
Denter, N. M., Seeger, F., & Moehrle, M. G. (2023) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102506 · Cited by 64
Blockchain Technology as an Institution of Property
Ishmaev, G. (2017) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/meta.12277 · Cited by 62
Alnafrah, I., & Mouselli, S. (2021) · International Journal of Educational Development · doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102460 · Cited by 57
Mahmoodi, A., Hashemi, L., Jasemi, M., Mehraban, S., Laliberté, J. F., & Millar, R. C. (2022) · OPSEARCH · doi:10.1007/s12597-022-00608-x · Cited by 53
Alnafrah, I. (2021) · Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1186/s13731-021-00159-3 · Cited by 44
Intellectual property rights protection and trade: An empirical analysis
Auriol, E., Biancini, S., & Paillacar, R. (2022) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106072 · Cited by 43
A patent registration and trading system based on blockchain
Hu, J. G., Zhu, P., Qi, Y., Zhu, Q., & Li, X. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117094 · Cited by 42
A reinforcement learning model for the reliability of blockchain oracles
Taghavi, M., Bentahar, J., Otrok, H., & Bakhtiyari, K. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119160 · Cited by 41
Digital transformation of the socio-economic system: prospects for digitalization in society
Охріменко, І. В., Александровна, С. И., Pyankova, S. G., & Lukyanova, A. (2019) · Revista ESPACIOS · Cited by 39
The sharing economy meets reality
Cusumano, M. A. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3163905 · Cited by 35
Zheng, Z., Chen, W., & Huang, H. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-1059-5 · Cited by 30
Blockchain-enabled Sustainability Labeling in the Fashion Industry
Remme, A.-M. R., Stange, S.-M., Fagerstrøm, A., & Lasrado, L. A. (2022) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.015 · Cited by 27
Blockchain-based Internet of Musical Things
Turchet, L., & Ngo, C. N. (2022) · Blockchain Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.bcra.2022.100083 · Cited by 27
Industry 4.0 and Open Innovation: evidence from a case study
Bigliardi, B., Filippelli, S., & Tagliente, L. (2022) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.380 · Cited by 21
Develop an integrated candlestick technical analysis model using meta-heuristic algorithms
Mahmoodi, A., Hashemi, L., & Jasemi, M. (2023) · EuroMed Journal of Business · doi:10.1108/emjb-02-2022-0034 · Cited by 21
Bridy, A. (2016) · SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/swj2h · Cited by 18
Intellectual property clearinghouses: The effects of reduced transaction costs in licensing
Aoki, R., & Schiff, A. (2010) · Information Economics and Policy · doi:10.1016/j.infoecopol.2010.01.001 · Cited by 18
Open innovation and IPRs: Mutually incompatible or complementary institutions?
Silva, M. A. P. M. D. (2018) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2018.03.010 · Cited by 18
Alnafrah, I., Bogdanova, E., & Maximova, T. (2019) · International Journal of Intellectual Property Management · doi:10.1504/ijipm.2019.100207 · Cited by 18
Mahmoodi, A., Hashemi, L., Jasemi, M., Laliberté, J. F., Millar, R. C., & Noshadi, H. (2022) · Asian Journal of Economics and Banking · doi:10.1108/ajeb-11-2021-0131 · Cited by 18
Zhang, C., & Xu, Y. (2023) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2023.100417 · Cited by 15
Parc, J., & MESSERLIN, P. A. (2020) · International Journal of Cultural Policy · doi:10.1080/10286632.2020.1829608 · Cited by 13
Blockchain-Based Smart Propertization of Digital Content for Intellectual Rights Protection
Lee, N.-Y., Yang, J., & Kim, C. (2021) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics10121387 · Cited by 13
Farah, M. F., Naveed, M., & Ali, S. (2023) · Springer proceedings in business and economics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-32894-7_5 · Cited by 13
Alnafrah, I., Mouselli, S., & Bogdanova, E. (2020) · International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development · doi:10.1504/ijkbd.2020.108369 · Cited by 12
Metadata-based measurements transmission verified by a Merkle Tree
Diván, M. J., & Reynoso, M. L. S. (2021) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2021.106871 · Cited by 11
A new holistic approach for Studying Blockchain-based Intellectual Property Rights Ecosystem
Alnafrah, I., & Bogdanova, E. (2019) · WORLD OF ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT · doi:10.25205/2542-0429-2019-19-1-133-140 · Cited by 9
Sha, W., Luo, T., Leng, J., & Lin, Z. (2022) · International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD) · doi:10.1109/cscwd54268.2022.9776286 · Cited by 6
ATIPM: A Blockchain-Based Anonymous and Traceable Intellectual Property Management Scheme
Zhang, H., Lin, L., Zhang, G., Yang, Z., & Liu, W. (2023) · International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD) · doi:10.1109/cscwd57460.2023.10152748 · Cited by 6
Merkle tree digital signature and trusted computing platform
Xiaofei, W., Fan, H. M., Tang, X., & Guohua, C. (2006) · Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf02831799 · Cited by 5
Bataev, A. V., Zhuzhoma, I., & Bulatova, N. (2020) · International Conference on Industrial Technology and Management (ICITM) · doi:10.1109/icitm48982.2020.9080392 · Cited by 5
Unternehmen erfolgreich in (die) Zukunft führen
Rotzinger, J. (2017) · Gruppe Interaktion Organisation Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO) · doi:10.1007/s11612-017-0387-1 · Cited by 4
Blockchain in the Global South: Key Issues and Current Status
Kshetri, N. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-33944-8_1 · Cited by 4
PBFT Consensus Algorithm Based on Blockchain Intellectual Property Protection
Gao, Y. (2023) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-1983-3_43 · Cited by 3
Intellectual Property Protection Method Based on Block Chain Technology
Liu, L., & Sun, B. (2023) · Lecture notes on data engineering and communications technologies · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-1157-8_64 · Cited by 2
Digitalisierung von Daten und Prozessen
Märtin, M. (2016) · Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb · doi:10.3139/104.111536 · Cited by 1
Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk
Bessen, J., & Meurer, M. J. (2009) · doi:10.1515/9781400828692
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Mougayar, 2016, The Business Blockchain : Promise, Practice, and Application of the Next Internet Technology
- Nguyen, 2023, Law PMP of L at U of WS of. Blockchain games and a disruptive corporate business model, Stanford Journal of Blockchain Law and Policy
- Samuelson, 2010, Cpp M of T. The copyright principles project: directions for reform, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 25, 1175
Cited by
Enforcement of smart contracts in cross-jurisdictional transactions
Atiyah, G. A., Ibrahim, A. I., & Jasim, A. A. (2024) · International Journal of Law and Management · doi:10.1108/ijlma-06-2024-0220 · Cited by 14
Prioritizing interoperable AI-driven solutions for sustainable circular economy in the public sector
Alshibani, S. M., Singhal, A. B., Gupta, B., Papa, A., & Giudice, M. D. (2026) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124513 · Cited by 9
Wang, S. (2025) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/02666669251349154 · Cited by 9
The Paradox of Decentralization: NFTs, Platform Capitalism and the Tokenized Knowledge Economy
Vindigni, G. (2025) · Scientia. Technology, science and society. · doi:10.59324/stss.2025.2(11).13 · Cited by 6
Al-Humaimeedy, A. S. (2025) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi17100444 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Alqarni, A.
- Affiliations
- Jazan University (SA)
- Corresponding author
- Alqarni, Amani
- ORCID
- Alqarni, Amani
- Venue
- Kybernetes
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2024-07-31
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 7380-7407
- ISSN
- 0368-492X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-7883
- OpenAlex
- W4401175694
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 8.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Kybernetes (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Rights Management and Security
- Keywords
- intellectual property management, blockchain, smart contracts, non-fungible tokens, decentralized autonomous organizations, intellectual property licensing, royalty distribution, transaction costs, transparency, intellectual property commercialization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review