Cited by 2,526Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityElectronic Health Records SystemsBlockchain Technology in Education and Learning

MedRec: Using Blockchain for Medical Data Access and Permission Management

Azaria, Asaph, Ekblaw, Ariel, Vieira, Thiago, Lippman, Andrew·2016·2016 2nd International Conference on Open and Big Data (OBD)

Abstract

Years of heavy regulation and bureaucratic inefficiency have slowed innovation for electronic medical records (EMRs). We now face a critical need for such innovation, as personalization and data science prompt patients to engage in the details of their healthcare and restore agency over their medical data. In this paper, we propose MedRec: a novel, decentralized record management system to handle EMRs, using blockchain technology. Our system gives patients a comprehensive, immutable log and easy access to their medical information across providers and treatment sites. Leveraging unique blockchain properties, MedRec manages authentication, confidentiality, accountability and data sharing- crucial considerations when handling sensitive information. A modular design integrates with providers' existing, local data storage solutions, facilitating interoperability and making our system convenient and adaptable. We incentivize medical stakeholders (researchers, public health authorities, etc.) to participate in the network as blockchain “miners”. This provides them with access to aggregate, anonymized data as mining rewards, in return for sustaining and securing the network via Proof of Work. MedRec thus enables the emergence of data economics, supplying big data to empower researchers while engaging patients and providers in the choice to release metadata. The purpose of this short paper is to expose, prior to field tests, a working prototype through which we analyze and discuss our approach.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/obd.2016.11

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There has been no study to evaluate the use of blockchain technology in an mHealth system.

    “However, there has been no study to evaluate the use of blockchain technology in an mHealth system.”

    From Tamper-Resistant Mobile Health Using Blockchain Technology. (2017) · cites this paper as [10]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Azaria, A., Ekblaw, A., Vieira, T., & Lippman, A.
Affiliations
MIT Media Lab (US)
Venue
2016 2nd International Conference on Open and Big Data (OBD)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2016-08
Pages
25-30
OpenAlex
W2522448907
Cited by
2,526
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 149 · 2025: 253 · 2024: 280 · 2023: 347 · 2022: 320 · 2021: 373 · 2020: 314 · 2019: 296 · 2018: 157 · 2017: 36
FWCI
138.47
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Open and Big Data (OBD) (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Keywords
electronic health records, blockchain, health information access, permission management, data interoperability, data sharing, data privacy, authentication, accountability, proof-of-work, data economics, patient data ownership, incentive mechanisms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review