The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transparency among S&P 500 companies: an analysis of ESG disclosure scores
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore the state of S&P 500 companies’ transparency by analyzing their Bloomberg ESG (Environmental-Social-Governance) disclosure scores. Additionally, the effects of industry sector, firm size, and governance practices on transparency are examined. Design/methodology/approach: Data were retrieved from Bloomberg using the financial analysis environmental, social and governance function for companies comprising the S&P 500 index. Descriptive statistics are provided on each of the three components separately (ESG). Nonparametric procedures are used to test for significant differences in transparency within each of these three areas based on industry sector. Additionally, nonparametric tests are used to determine the impact of firm size (market capitalization) and governance factors (board size, board gender diversity, chief executive officer (CEO) duality, and linking executive compensation to ESG disclosure) on the composite ESG score. Findings: Descriptive statistics reveal that S&P 500 companies differ in their level of disclosure across the three areas (ESG). The highest level of transparency is found on Governance and the lowest on Environmental. Moreover, there is much variability in the percentage of S&P 500 companies disclosing information about specific Social policies (e.g. child labor). Significant differences in transparency on both the Social and Governance dimensions are found between certain industry sectors. The results also reveal that large-cap companies have significantly higher ESG disclosure scores than mid-cap companies and that governance factors impact ESG disclosure. Significantly, higher ESG disclosure scores are observed for S&P 500 firms with larger boards of directors, with boards that are more gender diverse, that allow CEO duality, and that link executive compensation to ESG scores. Originality/value: This study focuses on corporate transparency through a granular analysis of ESG disclosure scores when most other studies have been primarily conducted at the macro level. Stakeholders, analysts, and shareholders are increasingly scrutinizing firms’ sustainability disclosures in their assessment of management quality, as it reflects on the practices/policies that are employed to improve firms’ environmental and social footprints.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x · Cited by 71,491
(2010) · Cited by 24,023
The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis.
Andrews, A. O., Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393344 · Cited by 8,261
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259247 · Cited by 5,039
Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996) · Harvard business review · Cited by 5,015
The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984 · Cited by 4,104
Green supply-chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review
Srivastava, S. K. (2007) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00202.x · Cited by 3,984
What We Know and Don’t Know About Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311436079 · Cited by 3,558
Corporate Governance, Board Diversity, and Firm Value
Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003) · Financial Review · doi:10.1111/1540-6288.00034 · Cited by 3,353
Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/09513579510146996 · Cited by 3,321
Cited by
Greenwashing in environmental, social and governance disclosures
Yu, E. P.-Y., Luu, B. V., & Chen, C. H. (2020) · Research in International Business and Finance · doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101192 · Cited by 1,119
How Do Companies Respond to Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) ratings? Evidence from Italy
Clementino, E., & Perkins, R. (2021) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-020-04441-4 · Cited by 486
Understanding the Impact of ESG Practices in Corporate Finance
Kim, S., & Li, Z. (. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13073746 · Cited by 389
ESG and Industry 5.0: The role of technologies in enhancing ESG disclosure
Asif, M., Searcy, C., & Castka, P. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122806 · Cited by 325
De Lucia, C., Pazienza, P., & Bartlett, M. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12135317 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Tamimi, N., & Sebastianelli, R.
- Venue
- Management Decision
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2017-09-18
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1660-1680
- ISSN
- 0025-1747 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2741574316
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 24.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transparency among S&P 500 companies: an analysis of ESG disclosure scores. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/md-01-2017-0018
- The paper
- Tamimi, N., & Sebastianelli, R. (2017). Transparency among S&P 500 companies: an analysis of ESG disclosure scores. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-01-2017-0018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.