CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 85

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The role of new product development in underpinning the circular economy: A systematic review and integrative framework

Pinheiro, Marco Antonio Paula, Seles, Bruno Michel Roman Pais, De Camargo Fiorini, Paula, Jugend, Daniel, Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz, da Silva, Hermes Moretti Ribeiro, Latan, Hengky·2019·Management Decision
DOI 10.1108/md-07-2018-0782
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify and systematize journal articles that relate to new product development (NPD) within a circular economy (CE) and to present an integrative framework. Design/methodology/approach: It was conducted a qualitative research based on a systematic review of the literature. Findings: As results, it is presented the identification of the main practices and actions of CE applied to NPD, as well as the drivers, barriers and the stakeholders involved in the integration between CE and NPD. Originality/value: The main contributions of this research are: mapping the state-of-the-art on the topic and systematizing the existing knowledge; providing useful insights for product development professionals considering adopting CE practices and tools in their NPD processes; and presenting a unique, integrative framework to guide organizations’ actions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/md-07-2018-0782

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 89

  1. 2015, The circular economy, design thinking and education for sustainability, Local Economy, 30, 305, 10.1177/0269094215578226 · DOI
  2. 2009, Making sustainable development sustainable, Management Decision, 47, 975, 10.1108/00251740910966686 · DOI
  3. 2017, Product design in the circular economy: users’ perception of end-of-life scenarios for electrical and electronic appliances, Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 1059, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.082 · DOI
  4. 2016, Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy, Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33, 308, 10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 2017, Tools of environmental management and EU circular economy, MM Science Journal, 1, 1700
  6. 2016, Developments in life cycle assessment applied to evaluate the environmental performance of construction and demolition wastes, Waste Management, 50, 151, 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.01.036 · DOI
  7. 2018, Exploring how usage-focused business models enable circular economy through digital technologies, Sustainability, 10, 639, 10.3390/su10030639 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 2014, Ecodesign in project management: a missing link for integration of sustainability in product development?, Journal of Cleaner Production, 80, 106, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.088 · DOI
  9. 2017, From energy efficiency towards resource efficiency within the ecodesign directive, Journal of Cleaner Production, 144, 358, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.144 · DOI
  10. 2017, Can project sustainability management impact project success? An empirical study applying contingent approach, International Journal of Project Management, 35, 1120, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.018 · DOI
  11. Ceha, A. (2017), “Tackling the circular economy: aiding firms in the design and implementation of circular business models”, master thesis, University of Twente Enschede, NL.
  12. 1993, Managing New Product and Process Development: Text and Cases
  13. 2018, On the tolerable limits of granulated recycled material additives to maintain structural integrity, Construction and Building Materials, 167, 846, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.099 · DOI
  14. 2001, Winning at New Products: Accelerating the Process from Idea to Launch
  15. 2016, Industry attitudes towards ecodesign standards for improved resource efficiency, Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 155, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.035 · DOI
  16. 2017, Application of exergy-based approach for implementing design for reuse: the case of microwave oven, Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 876, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.034 · DOI
  17. 2017, Skills and capabilities for a sustainable and circular economy: the changing role of design, Journal of Cleaner Production, 160, 109, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.130 · DOI
  18. 1983, The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields, American Sociological Review, 48, 147, 10.2307/2095101 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 2018, Supplier relationship management for circular economy: Influence of external pressures and top management commitment, Management Decision
  20. 2017, Circular design futures, The Design Journal, 20, 421, 10.1080/14606925.2017.1328164 · DOI
  21. 2015, Green supply chain management: a review and bibliometric analysis, International Journal of Production Economics, 162, 101, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 2017, Circular economy at the micro level: a dynamic view of incumbents’ struggles and challenges in the textile industry, Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 833, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.056 · DOI
  23. 2018, A systematic approach to conducting review studies: an assessment of content analysis in 25 years of IB research, Journal of World Business, 53, 280, 10.1016/j.jwb.2017.11.003 · DOI
  24. 2018, Exploring environmental and economic costs and benefits of a circular economy approach to the construction and demolition sector. A literature review, Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 618, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.207 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 2009, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
  26. 2017, Circular economy strategies for electric and electronic equipment: a fuzzy cognitive map, Environmental Engineering & Management Journal, 16, 1807, 10.30638/eemj.2017.197 · DOI
  27. 2013, Corporate sustainability performance and firm performance research: literature review and future research agenda, Management Decision, 51, 361, 10.1108/00251741311301867 · DOI
  28. 2017, To realize better extended producer responsibility: redesign of WEEE fund mode in China, Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 347, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.168 · DOI
  29. 2018, Emotional durability design nine – a tool for product longevity, Sustainability, 10, 1
  30. 2017, Standard vs. upcycled fashion design and production, Fashion Practice, 9, 69, 10.1080/17569370.2016.1227146 · DOI
  31. 2016, Google scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison, Scientometrics, 106, 787, 10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 2018, Developing and implementing circular economy business models in service-oriented technology companies, Journal of Cleaner Production, 177, 621, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.168 · DOI
  33. 2017, Cascade use indicators for selected biopolymers: are we aiming for the right solutions in the design for recycling of bio-based polymers?, Waste Management & Research, 35, 367, 10.1177/0734242X16683445 · DOI
  34. 2016, Closing the loop or squaring the circle? Locating generative spaces for the circular economy, Progress in Human Geography, 40, 88, 10.1177/0309132514566342 · DOI
  35. 2018, Systems of practice and the circular economy: transforming mobile phone product service systems, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 26, 147, 10.1016/j.eist.2017.04.002 · DOI
  36. 2017, Product design in a circular economy: development of a typology of key concepts and terms, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21, 517, 10.1111/jiec.12610 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 2015, Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost implication of residential buildings – a review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42, 129, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.006 · DOI
  38. 2013, Environmental training in organisations: from a literature review to a framework for future research, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 74, 144, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.12.017 · DOI
  39. 2017, Enabling circular economy through product stewardship, Procedia Manufacturing, 8, 377, 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.048 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 2017, Green product development and product portfolio management: empirical evidence from an emerging economy, Business Strategy and the Environment, 26, 1181, 10.1002/bse.1977 · DOI
  41. 2018, Towards design strategies for circular medical products, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 38, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.030 · DOI
  42. 2018, Product/service-systems for a circular economy: the route to decoupling economic growth from resource consumption?, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 1
  43. 2010, Variations of the kanban system: literature review and classification, International Journal of Production Economics, 125, 13, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.01.009 · DOI
  44. 2015, Some pervasive challenges to sustainability by design of electronic products – a conceptual discussion, Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 281, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.041 · DOI
  45. 2016, Unintended environmental consequences of improvement actions: a qualitative analysis of systems’ structure and behavior, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 33, 381, 10.1002/sres.2330 · DOI
  46. 2017, Towards circular economy implementation in manufacturing systems using a multi-method simulation approach to link design and business strategy, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 93, 1953, 10.1007/s00170-017-0610-9 · DOI
  47. 2018, A multi-usable cloud service platform: a case study on improved development pace and efficiency, Applied Sciences, 8, 316, 10.3390/app8020316 · DOI
  48. 2016, Ecodesign field of research throughout the world: mapping the territory by using an evolutionary lens, Scientometrics, 109, 241, 10.1007/s11192-016-2043-x · DOI
  49. 2006, EcoDesign and The Ten Golden Rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development, Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 1396, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.022 · DOI
  50. 2010, Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things
  51. 2016, Regulating planned obsolescence: a review of legal approaches to increase product durability and reparability in Europe, Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 25, 378, 10.1111/reel.12182 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 2018, Time-based disassembly method: how to assess the best disassembly sequence and time of target components in complex products, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 95, 409, 10.1007/s00170-017-1201-5 · DOI
  53. 2015, Using project management as a way to sustainability. From a comprehensive review to a framework definition, Journal of Cleaner Production, 99, 1, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.020 · DOI
  54. 2015, Human development and data envelopment analysis: a structured literature review, Omega, 54, 33, 10.1016/j.omega.2015.01.002 · DOI
  55. 2011, Progress toward a circular economy in China: the drivers (and inhibitors) of eco-industrial initiative, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 15, 435, 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00332.x · DOI
  56. 2017, Integrating backcasting and eco-design for the circular economy, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21, 526, 10.1111/jiec.12590 · DOI
  57. 2018, Evaluating indicators for international manufacturing network under circular economy, Management Decision
  58. 2015, A conceptual framework to develop green textiles in the aeronautic completion industry: a case study in a large manufacturing company, Journal of Cleaner Production, 105, 371, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.056 · DOI
  59. 2017, The circular economy: an interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context, Journal of Business Ethics, 140, 369, 10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 2016, Circular economy: to be or not to be in a closed product loop? A life cycle assessment of aluminium cans with inclusion of alloying elements, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 114, 18, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.06.023 · DOI
  61. 2018, Challenges and opportunities in a circular economy for a local productive arrangement of furniture in Brazil, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 202, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.031 · DOI
  62. Oxford Dictionaries (2017), “English Oxford Dictionary”, available at: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/ (accessed July 10, 2018).
  63. 2015, Critical materials from a product design perspective, Materials & Design, 65, 147, 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.08.042 · DOI
  64. 2017, Design for disassembly criteria in EU product policies for a more circular economy: a method for analyzing battery packs in PC-tablets and subnotebooks, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21, 731, 10.1111/jiec.12608 · DOI
  65. 2017, ‘Upgradable PSS’: clarifying a new concept of sustainable consumption/production based on upgradability, Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 538, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.161 · DOI
  66. 2013, Ecodesign maturity model: a management framework to support ecodesign implementation into manufacturing companies, Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 160, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.040 · DOI
  67. 2018, Framework proposal for ecodesign integration on product portfolio management, Journal of Cleaner Production, 185, 176, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.005 · DOI
  68. 2014, Circular Economy. Is it Enough?
  69. 2016, A bibliometric review of open innovation: setting a research agenda, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33, 750, 10.1111/jpim.12312 · DOI
  70. 2016, Extended producer responsibility for lamps in Nordic countries: best practices and challenges in closing material loops, Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 167, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.131 · DOI
  71. 2016, Review of ecodesign methods and tools. Barriers and strategies for an effective implementation in industrial companies, Journal of Cleaner Production, 129, 361, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.051 · DOI
  72. 2018, Capital project planning for a circular economy, Construction Management and Economics, 36, 303, 10.1080/01446193.2018.1435895 · DOI
  73. 2016, Two life cycle assessment (LCA) based methods to analyse and design complex (regional) circular economy systems. Case: making water tourism more sustainable, Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 257, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.075 · DOI
  74. 2012, Conducting content-analysis based literature reviews in supply chain management, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17, 544, 10.1108/13598541211258609 · DOI
  75. 2008, From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management, Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 1699, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020 · DOI
  76. 2016, Implementing environmental considerations within product development practices: a survey on employees’ perspectives, Journal of Cleaner Production, 125, 189, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.023 · DOI
  77. 2017, Eco-design practices with a focus on quantitative environmental targets: an exploratory content analysis within ICT sector, Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 769, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.047 · DOI
  78. 2017, Considering sustainability in project management decision making; an investigation using Q-methodology, International Journal of Project Management, 35, 1133, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.01.011 · DOI
  79. 2016, Resource recovery from post-consumer waste: important lessons for the upcoming circular economy, Journal of Cleaner Production, 134, 342, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.020 · DOI
  80. 2018, Circles, spirals, pyramids and cubes: why the circular economy cannot work, Sustainability Science, 13, 479, 10.1007/s11625-017-0443-3 · DOI
  81. 2018, Exploring the challenges for circular business implementation in manufacturing companies: an empirical investigation of a pay-per-use service provider, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 3, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.033 · DOI
  82. 2018, Cleaner production as an antecedent for circular economy paradigm shift at the micro-level: evidence from a home appliance manufacturer, Journal of Cleaner Production, 185, 740, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.006 · DOI
  83. 2018, A decoupling perspective on circular business model implementation: illustrations from Swedish apparel, Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 630, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.249 · DOI
  84. 2017, In search of standards to support circularity in product policies: a systematic approach, Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 1533, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.198 · DOI
  85. 1997, Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI · Paper page
  86. 2015, Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy – a review, Journal of Cleaner Production, 97, 76, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.049 · DOI · Paper page
  87. 2018, Ease of disassembly of products to support circular economy strategies, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 323, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.06.022 · DOI
  88. 2012, Why have ‘sustainable product-service systems’ not been widely implemented? Meeting new design challenges to achieve societal sustainability, Journal of Cleaner Production, 35, 288, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.050 · DOI · Paper page
  89. 2015, The Circular Economy: A Wealth of Flows

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pinheiro, M. A. P., Seles, B. M. R. P., De Camargo Fiorini, P., Jugend, D., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., da Silva, H. M. R., & Latan, H.
ORCID
Venue
Management Decision
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2019-04-18
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
840-862
ISSN
0025-1747
DOI
10.1108/md-07-2018-0782
Cited by
85
References
4
Language
en
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review