Cited by 564Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementSustainable Design and DevelopmentSustainable Industrial Ecology

A Conceptual Framework for Circular Design

Open access
Moreno, Mariale, De los Rios, Carolina, Rowe, Zoe, Charnley, Fiona·2016·Sustainability

Abstract

Design has been recognised in the literature as a catalyst to move away from the traditional model of take-make-dispose to achieve a more restorative, regenerative and circular economy. As such, for a circular economy to thrive, products need to be designed for closed loops, as well as be adapted to generate revenues. This should not only be at the point of purchase, but also during use, and be supported by low-cost return chains and reprocessing structures, as well as effective policy and regulation. To date, most academic and grey literature on the circular economy has focused primarily on the development of new business models, with some of the latter studies addressing design strategies for a circular economy, specifically in the area of resource cycles and design for product life extension. However, these studies primarily consider a limited spectrum of the technical and biological cycles where materials are recovered and restored and nutrients (e.g., materials, energy, water) are regenerated. This provides little guidance or clarity for designers wishing to design for new circular business models in practice. As such, this paper aims to address this gap by systematically analysing previous literature on Design for Sustainability (DfX) (e.g., design for resource conservation, design for slowing resource loops and whole systems design) and links these approaches to the current literature on circular business models. A conceptual framework is developed for circular economy design strategies. From this conceptual framework, recommendations are made to enable designers to fully consider the holistic implications for design within a circular economy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su8090937

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This research shows another approach for servitization in the context of CE than that commonly discussed in previous literature: product development initiatives for CE occurring concurrently with the business model development of PSS.

    “Moreover, this research contributes to the literature by showing another approach for servitization in the context of CE than that commonly discussed in previous literature [6,15,38], which addresses the occurrence of product development initiatives for CE concurrently with the business model development of PSS.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 57 · Cited by 564

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Charnley, F.; Lemon, M.; Evans, S. Exploring the process of whole system design. Des. Stud. 2011, 32, 156-179. [CrossRef] · DOI
  2. Peck, D.P.; Kandachar, P.V.; Tempelman, E. Critical materials from a product design perspective. Mater. Des. 2015, 65, 147-159. [CrossRef] · DOI
  3. McDonough, W.; Braungart, M. Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things; North Point Press: New York, NY, USA, 2002.
  4. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Towards the Circular Economy Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition. Available online: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/ publications/Ellen-MacArthur-Foundation-Towards-the-Circular-Economy-vol.1.pdf (accessed on 25 June 2016).
  5. Bocken, N.M.P.; de Pauw, I.; Bakker, C.; van der Grinten, B. Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. J. Ind. Prod. Eng. 2016, 33, 308-320. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  6. Go, T.F.; Wahab, D.A.; Hishamuddin, H. Multiple generation life-cycles for product sustainability: The way forward. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 95, 16-29. [CrossRef] · DOI
  7. Vezzoli, C.; Manzini, E. Design for Environmental Sustainability; Springer: London, UK, 2008.
  8. Clark, G.; Kosoris, J.; Hong, L.N.; Crul, M. Design for sustainability: Current trends in sustainable product design and development. Sustainability 2009, 1, 409-424. [CrossRef] · DOI
  9. De los Rios, C.; Charnley, F. Skills and capabilities for a sustainable and circular economy: The changing role of design. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, in press.
  10. Allwood, J.M.; Cullen, J.; Carruth, M.A.; Cooper, D.; McBrien, M.; Milford, R.L.; Moynihan, M.C.; Patel, A.C.H. Sustainable Materials: With Both Eyes Open; UIT: Cambridge, UK, 2012.
  11. Allwood, J.M.; Ashby, M.F.; Gutowski, T.G.; Worrell, E. Material efficiency: A white paper. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2011, 55, 362-381. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  12. Chertow, M.; Ehrenfeld, J. Organizing Self-Organizing Systems. J. Ind. Ecol. 2012, 16, 13-27. [CrossRef] · DOI
  13. Lieder, M.; Rashid, A. Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 115, 36-51. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  14. Rashid, A.; Asif, F.M.; Krajnik, P.; Nicolescu, C.M. Resource conservative manufacturing: An essential change in business and technology paradigm for sustainable manufacturing. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 57, 166-177. [CrossRef] · DOI
  15. Ashby, M.; Johnson, K. The art of materials selection. Mater. Today 2003, 6, 24-35. [CrossRef] · DOI
  16. Accorsi, R.; Manzini, R.; Pini, C.; Penazzi, S. On the design of closed-loop networks for product life cycle management: Economic, environmental and geography considerations. J. Transp. Geogr. 2015, 48, 121-134. [CrossRef] · DOI
  17. Bakker, C.A.; Wang, F.; Huisman, J.; den Hollander, M. Products that go round: Exploring product life extension through design. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 69, 10-16. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  18. Bogue, R. Design for disassembly: A critical twenty-first century discipline. Assem. Autom. 2007, 27, 285-289.
  19. Boothroyd, G. Product design for manufacture and assembly. Comput. Aided Des. 1994, 26, 505-520. [CrossRef] · DOI
  20. Claypool, E.; Norman, B.A.; Needy, K.L. Modeling risk in a Design for Supply Chain problem. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2014, 78, 44-54. [CrossRef] · DOI
  21. Cooper, T. Product development implications of sustainable consumption. Des. J. 2000, 3, 46-57. [CrossRef] · DOI
  22. Edwards, K. Towards more strategic product design for manufacture and assembly: Priorities for concurrent engineering. Mater. Des. 2002, 23, 651-656. [CrossRef] · DOI
  23. Ijomah, W.L.; McMahon, C.A.; Hammond, G.P.; Newman, S.T. Development of design for remanufacturing guidelines to support sustainable manufacturing. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2007, 23, 712-719. [CrossRef] · DOI
  24. Johansson, G. Product Innovation for Sustainability-On Product Properties for Efficient Disassembly. Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 2008, 1, 32-41. [CrossRef] · DOI
  25. Kimura, F.; Kato, S.; Hata, T.; Masuda, T. Product modularization for parts reuse in inverse manufacturing. CIRP Annu. Manuf. Technol. 2001, 50, 89-92. [CrossRef] · DOI
  26. King, A.M.; Burgess, S.C.; Ijomah, W.; McMahon, C.A. Reducing waste: Repair, recondition, remanufacture or recycle? Sustain. Dev. 2006, 14, 257-267. [CrossRef] · DOI
  27. Lofthouse, V. Ecodesign tools for designers: Defining the requirements. J. Clean. Prod. 2006, 14, 1386-1395. [CrossRef] · DOI
  28. Morelli, N. Developing new product service systems (PSS): Methodologies and operational tools. J. Clean. Prod. 2006, 14, 1495-1501. [CrossRef] · DOI
  29. Hatcher, G.D.; Ijomah, W.L.; Windmill, J.F.C. Design for remanufacture: A literature review and future research needs. J. Clean. Prod. 2011, 19, 2004-2014. [CrossRef] · DOI
  30. Sundin, E.; Lindahl, M. Rethinking product design for remanufacturing to facilitate integrated product service offerings. IEEE Int. Symp. Electron. Enviorn. 2008, 6, 375-392.
  31. Van Nes, N.; Cramer, J. Product lifetime optimization: A challenging strategy towards more sustainable consumption patterns. J. Clean. Prod. 2006, 14, 1307-1318. [CrossRef] · DOI
  32. Braungart, M.; McDonough, W.; Bollinger, A. Cradle-to-cradle design: Creating healthy emissions-A strategy for eco-effective product and system design. J. Clean. Prod. 2007, 15, 1337-1348. [CrossRef] · DOI
  33. Nagel, J.K.; Nagel, R.L.; Stone, R.B.; McAdams, D.A. Function-based, biologically inspired concept generation. Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. 2010, 24, 521-535. [CrossRef] · DOI
  34. Schenkel, M.; Caniëls, M.C.; Krikke, H.; van der Laan, E. Understanding value creation in closed loop supply chains/ Past findings and future directions. J. Manuf. Syst. 2015, 37, 729-745. [CrossRef] · DOI
  35. Vincent, J.F.; Bogatyreva, O.A.; Bogatyrev, N.R.; Bowyer, A.; Pahl, A.K. Biomimetics: Its practice and theory. J. R. Soc. Int. 2006, 3, 471-482. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  36. Wells, P.; Seitz, M. Business models and closed-loop supply chains: A typology. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2005, 10, 249-251. [CrossRef] · DOI
  37. Lewandowski, M. Designing the Business Models for Circular Economy-Towards the Conceptual Framework. Sustainability 2016, 8, 43. [CrossRef] · DOI
  38. Bocken, N.M.P.; Samuel, W.; Short, S.W.; Rana, P.; Evans, S. A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 65, 42-56. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  39. Tukker, A. Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy-A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 97, 76-91. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  40. Allwood, J.M. Squaring the circular economy: The role of recycling within a hierarchy of material management strategies. Handb. Recycl. 2014, 30, 445-477.
  41. Andrews, D. The circular economy, design thinking and education for sustainability. Local Econ. 2015, 30, 305-315. [CrossRef] · DOI
  42. Packard, V. The Waste Makers; Penguin: London, UK, 1960; Volume 1064.
  43. Maguire, P.; Woodham, J. Design and Cultural Politics in Post War Britain: Britain Can Make It Exhibition of 1946; Bloomsbury T&T Clark: London, UK; Washington, DC, USA, 1997.
  44. Winkler, H. Closed-loop production systems-A sustainable supply chain approach. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 2011, 4, 243-246. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  45. Cohen, M.J. Sustainable consumption research as democratic expertise. J. Consum. Policy 2006, 29, 67-77. [CrossRef] · DOI
  46. Stahel, W.R. The utilization focused service economy: Resource efficiency. In The Greening of Industrial Ecosystem; Allenby, B.R., Richards, D.J., Eds.; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1994; pp. 178-190.
  47. Stahel, W.R. The Performance Economy, 1st ed.; Palgrave Macmillan: Hampshire, UK, 2010.
  48. Grinton Orr, S., Ed.; HARC: Houston, TX, USA, 1981; pp. 72-96.
  49. Boks, C.; Lilley, D.; Pettersen, I. The future of design for sustainable behaviour revisited. In Proceedings of the 2015 9th EcoDesign International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, Tokyo, Japan, 2-4 December 2015.
  50. Lilley, D. Design for sustainable behaviour: Strategies and perceptions. Des. Stud. 2009, 30, 704-720. [CrossRef] · DOI
  51. Piscicelli, L.; Ludden, G. The potential of Design for Behaviour Change to foster the transition to a circular economy. In Proceedings of the Design Research Society, Brighton, UK, 27-30 June 2016.
  52. Joore, P.; Brezet, H. A Multilevel Design Model: The mutual relationship between product-service system development and societal change processes. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 97, 92-105. [CrossRef] · DOI
  53. Linder, M.; Williander, M. Circular Business Model Innovation: Inherent Uncertainties. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2015. [CrossRef] · DOI
  54. Meroni, A. Strategic design: Where are we now? Reflection around the foundations of a recent discipline. Strat. Des. Res. J. 2008, 1, 31-28. [CrossRef · DOI

Authors
Moreno, M., De los Rios, C., Rowe, Z., & Charnley, F.
Affiliations
  • Cranfield University (GB)
  • Centre for Competitive Creative Design (C4D), Cranfield University, College Road, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UK
Corresponding author
Charnley, Fiona
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2016-09-13
Volume
8
Issue
9
Pages
937
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2520095882
Cited by
564
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 17
FWCI
76.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • CERES (Cranfield University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
EPSRC (EP/M017567/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Sustainable Industrial Ecology
Keywords
circular economy, circular design, sustainable design, circular business models, resource cycles, product life extension, reprocessing, nutrient regeneration, design strategies, conceptual framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review