Cited by 116Environmental Sustainability in BusinessConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationSustainable Supply Chain Management

The spillover effect of greenwashing behaviours: an experimental approach

Wang, Hong, Ma, Baolong, Bai, Rubing·2020·Marketing Intelligence & Planning

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of greenwashing behaviour of one brand on purchase intention of green products from other brands. Further, this study tests the mediating role of greenwashing perception of the entire industry and the moderating role of brand attitudes towards other brands in the industry for the above-mentioned relationship. Design/methodology/approach A sample of 377 participants was utilised in three studies. The study analysed the data using SPSS 18.0 to test the research hypotheses. Findings The study suggests that greenwashing behaviour of one brand negatively affects consumers’ purchase intention of the green products from other brands in the industry. It is also indicated that the greenwashing perception of the entire industry partially mediates the relationship between greenwashing behaviour of a brand and purchase intention of green products from other brands. In addition, the study shows that the relationship between greenwashing perception of the entire industry and purchase intention of the green products from other brands is negatively moderated by brand attitudes towards other brands in the industry. Practical implications This study provides useful insights for the managers that firms can learn the way to alleviate greenwashing spillover effect through the brand attitudes to enhance green purchasing behaviour. Originality/value The study is perhaps the first one to study the existence of the spillover effect of brands’…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/mip-01-2019-0006

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When consumers realize that certain green products present misleading information, a reputation for greenwashing is formed, which compels consumers to be more cautious about these products and increases their predisposition to discovering negative information about other brands in the sector.

    “When consumers realize that certain green products present misleading information, a reputation for greenwashing is formed, which compels consumers to be more cautious about these products and increases their predisposition to discovering negative information about other brands in the sector (Chen & Chang, 2013a;Nyilasy et al., 2014;Wang et al., 2019).”

    From Sustainable clothing: Why conspicuous consumption and greenwashing matter (2023) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, H., Ma, B., & Bai, R.
Affiliations
Beijing Institute of Technology (CN)
Venue
Marketing Intelligence & Planning
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2019-12-16
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
283-295
ISSN
0263-4503 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2994613023
Cited by
116
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5
FWCI
6.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Marketing Intelligence & Planning (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
greenwashing, spillover effects, purchase intention, green products, brand attitude, green purchasing behaviour, consumer behavior, mediation, moderation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review