CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 238Artificial Intelligence in EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring the integration of ChatGPT in education: adapting for the future

Elbanna, Said, Armstrong, Loreta·2024·Management & Sustainability: An Arab Review
DOI 10.1108/msar-03-2023-0016
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose This article aims to explore the advantages of integrating a new generative artificial intelligence (AI) technology in education. It investigates the use of ChatGPT in personalized learning, assessment and content creation and examines ways to manage its limitations and some ethical considerations. The purpose is to stimulate discussion on the effective application of ChatGPT as a tool for learning and skill development while remaining mindful of the ethical issues involved. Design/methodology/approach The methodology in this article includes four steps: a literature search, screening and selection, analysis and synthesis. The literature was thoroughly screened and selected on the basis of its relevance to the research question, before selected material were carefully read and analyzed. The insights gained from this analysis were then synthesized to identify key considerations in integrating ChatGPT in education. Findings The study concludes that ChatGPT can be effectively integrated into education to automate routine tasks and enhance the learning experience for students, ultimately increasing productivity and efficiency and fostering adaptive learning. However, the limitations of ChatGPT, even when updated, must be borne in mind, including factual inconsistencies, potential bias promotion, lack of in-depth understanding and safety concerns. The study nevertheless highlights the benefits of responsibly integrating ChatGPT within the field of education. Practical impl…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/msar-03-2023-0016

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. 2017, Robot-proof: Higher Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
  2. 2023, ChatGPT and AI Text Generators: Should Academia Adapt or Resist?
  3. 2022, Viable system model: a tool for managing sustainable development holistically. Management & Sustainability, An Arab Review, 1, 50
  4. 2022, Editorial: between antiquity and modernity in sustainability management research: reflections from MSAR board members, Management & Sustainability: An Arab Review, 1, 1
  5. 2005, A Whole New Mind: Moving from the Information Age to the Conceptual Age
  6. 2022, Engineering Education in the Era of ChatGPT: Promise and Pitfalls of Generative AI for Education
  7. 2022, AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays-should academics worry?, Nature
  8. 2023, Would Chat GPT Get a Wharton MBA? A Prediction Based on its Performance in the Operations Management Course

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 238

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Elbanna, S., & Armstrong, L.
Affiliations
Qatar University (QA)
ORCID
Venue
Management & Sustainability: An Arab Review
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2023-05-31
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
16-29
ISSN
  • 2752-9819 (ISSN-L)
  • 2752-9827
DOI
10.1108/msar-03-2023-0016
OpenAlex
W4381277798
Cited by
238
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 98 · 2023: 20
FWCI
56.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
Locations
  • Management & Sustainability An Arab Review (publishedVersion)
  • Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
ChatGPT, generative AI in education, personalized learning, automated assessment, content creation, AI ethics, algorithmic bias, responsible AI use, higher education, adaptive learning, skill development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review