The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CSR disclosure quantity to CSR disclosure quality – in pursuit of a disclosure quality index
Abstract
Purpose: Studies in corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure were initially focused more on disclosure “Quantity” than “Quality” and while they have started to explore “Disclosure Quality”, their assessment mechanisms are found to be immature. Thus, while a number of papers have sought to assess the quality of CSR disclosure, this paper aims to suggest an approach tied closely to both expectations in assessing “quality” derived from the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting (revised 2018) and the global reporting initiative. The outcome is to offer a best practice approach to assessing CSR disclosure quality. Design/methodology/approach: In this paper, prior literature is reviewed, qualitative characteristics from the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting (revised 2018) and globally recognised guidelines such as the GRI are reviewed. The framework for a “CSR disclosure quality index” as an assessment tool to assess CSR disclosure quality is developed from qualitative characteristics and criteria identified. Findings: The proposed CSR disclosure quality index is developed in stages from the qualitative characteristics identified in the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting (revised 2018) and criteria identified from the guidelines discussed. A table was then developed linking the qualitative characteristics to criteria providing a Likert scale approach to assessing the disclosures made by companies to make an assessment of the quality of the companies’ reports. It is argued this provides a robust assessment, being a direct and comprehensive measure of disclosure quality. Research limitations/implications: As with most qualitative work, there are alternative approaches to establishing an index, but the authors believe this is an approach offering links (and, therefore, credibility) to globally recognised guidelines in the assessment of CSR disclosure quality. Future work could enhance the alignment of this index with the sustainable development goals (SDGs), building on the preliminary connections established in this study. Practical implications: At a practical level this index offers an approach to reviewing the quality of CSR disclosures which could prove useful to policymakers and in the future development and expansion of this framework offering greater objectivity to assessments and justification for proposed improvement in reporting practice. Also, this index serves as a benchmarking tool for companies to meet the disclosure expectations of stakeholders. Social implications: This approach has the potential to substantially fulfil stakeholder expectations by addressing the growing demand for transparency in this area, while avoiding practices that could be perceived as superficial or misleading (greenwashing). Focusing on social issues enables stronger connections between companies and their stakeholders. Furthermore, the index helps companies link their CSR efforts with SDGs and show their commitment to long-term social value building in discussion of governance factors to show accountability expectations are being met. Originality/value: This paper contributes to CSR disclosure quality literature and provides a reliable method of assessing the quality of CSR disclosures. Opportunities for further and broader developments can be envisaged while offering a credible and reliable approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Voluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value: Further evidence
Plumlee, M., Brown, D., Hayes, R. M., & Marshall, R. S. (2015) · Journal of Accounting and Public Policy · doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2015.04.004 · Cited by 1,031
An Overview of Corporate Sustainability Reporting Legislation in the European Union
Hummel, K., & Jobst, D. (2024) · Accounting in Europe · doi:10.1080/17449480.2024.2312145 · Cited by 315
Research works printed but not linked: 129
- 2024, Does mandating ESG reporting reduce ESG decoupling? Evidence from the European Union's directive 2014/95, Business Strategy and the Environment, 33, 1305, 10.1002/bse.3543 · DOI
- 2004, The ethical, social and environmental reporting‐performance portrayal gap, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 17, 731, 10.1108/09513570410567791 · DOI
- 2004, Accountability, completeness, credibility and the audit expectations gap, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2004, 97, 10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2004.su.00010 · DOI
- 2009, Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 1, 10.1016/j.aos.2008.02.005 · DOI
- 2018, Is CSR reporting always favorable?, Management Decision, 56, 1506, 10.1108/MD-05-2017-0540 · DOI
- 1996, Corporate environmental disclosures: competitive disclosure hypothesis using 1991 annual report data, The International Journal of Accounting, 31, 175, 10.1016/S0020-7063(96)90003-5 · DOI
- 2023, The impact of sustainability governance attributes on comprehensive CSR reporting: a developing country setting, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31
- 2004, The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: a simultaneous equations approach, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 447, 10.1016/S0361-3682(03)00032-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Corporate governance and the quality of CSR disclosure: lessons from an emerging economy, Society and Business Review, 17, 280, 10.1108/SBR-09-2021-0153 · DOI
- 2012, An assessment of the quality of environmental information disclosure of corporation in China, Systems Engineering Procedia, 5, 420, 10.1016/j.sepro.2012.04.064 · DOI
- 2019, A study of the determinants of environmental disclosure quality: evidence from French listed companies, Journal of Management and Governance, 23, 939, 10.1007/s10997-019-09474-0 · DOI
- 2013, Firm value and the quality of sustainability reporting in Australia, Australian Accounting Review, 23, 67, 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2012.00187.x · DOI
- 2012, Exploring the strategic integration of sustainability initiatives: opportunities for accounting research, Accounting Horizons, 26, 265, 10.2308/acch-50088 · DOI
- 2014, Managing corporate sustainability and CSR: a conceptual framework combining values, strategies and instruments contributing to sustainable development, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21, 258, 10.1002/csr.1336 · DOI
- 2015, Assessing the communication quality of CSR reports. A case study on four Spanish food companies, Sustainability, 7, 11010, 10.3390/su70811010 · DOI
- 2004, A methodology for analysing and evaluating narratives in annual reports: a comprehensive descriptive profile and metrics for disclosure quality attributes, Accounting Forum, 28
- 2021, Measuring CSR disclosure when assessing stock market effects, Accounting and the Public Interest, 21, 1, 10.2308/API-2020-017 · DOI
- 2002, Stakeholder accountability or stakeholder management: a review of UK firms' social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting (SEAAR) practices, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9, 8, 10.1002/csr.5 · DOI
- 2008, Quality versus quantity: the case of forward-looking disclosure, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 23, 333, 10.1177/0148558X0802300304 · DOI
- 2018, Integrating sustainability in business model disclosure: evidence from the UK mining industry, Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 1161, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.282 · DOI
- 2004, The role of information precision in determining the cost of equity capital [journal article, ]. Review of Accounting Studies, 9, 233, 10.1023/B:RAST.0000028188.71604.0a · DOI
- 2006, Voluntary environmental disclosures by large UK companies, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 33, 1168, 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00598.x · DOI
- 2008, Factors influencing the quality of corporate environmental disclosure, Business Strategy and the Environment, 17, 120, 10.1002/bse.506 · DOI
- 2013, Corporations and human rights: towards an effective legal regulation, or the perpetuation of the status quo?, Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional, 13, 313
- 2021, Mandatory vs voluntary exercise on non-financial reporting: does a normative/coercive isomorphism facilitate an increase in quality?, Meditari Accountancy Research, 29, 449, 10.1108/MEDAR-08-2019-0540 · DOI
- 2015, The normativity and legitimacy of CSR disclosure: Evidence from France, Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 789, 10.1007/s10551-014-2114-y · DOI
- 2009, Is corporate responsibility converging? A comparison of corporate responsibility reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany, Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 299, 10.1007/s10551-008-9794-0 · DOI
- 2012, Enhancement and obfuscation through the use of graphs in sustainability reports: an international comparison, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 3, 74, 10.1108/20408021211223561 · DOI
- 2010, The language of US corporate environmental disclosure, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35, 431, 10.1016/j.aos.2009.10.002 · DOI
- 2022, Why is corporate virtue in the eye of the beholder? The case of ESG ratings, The Accounting Review, 97, 147, 10.2308/TAR-2019-0506 · DOI
- 2009, Voluntary narrative disclosures by local governments: a comparative analysis of the textual complexity of mayoral and chairpersons’ letters in annual reports, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68, 194, 10.1111/j.1467-8500.2009.00630.x · DOI
- 2008, Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: an empirical analysis, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 303
- 2013, The relevance of environmental disclosures: are such disclosures incrementally informative?, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32, 410, 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.06.008 · DOI · Paper page
- 2008, Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: an empirical analysis, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 303, 10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 2005, Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: Economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions?, European Accounting Review, 14, 3, 10.1080/0963818042000339617 · DOI · Paper page
- 2004, Corporate report obfuscation: artefact or phenomenon?, The British Accounting Review, 36, 291, 10.1016/j.bar.2004.03.005 · DOI
- 2016, Researching corporate social responsibility communication: themes, opportunities and challenges, Journal of Management Studies, 53, 1223, 10.1111/joms.12196 · DOI · Paper page
- 2006, Reporting organisational performance in managing human resources: intellectual capital or stakeholder perspectives?, Journal of Human Resource Costing and Accounting, 10, 164, 10.1108/14013380610718629 · DOI
- 2018, Seeking legitimacy through CSR reporting: evidence from China, Journal of Management Accounting Research, 30, 1, 10.2308/jmar-51627 · DOI
- 2003, Transparency and assurance minding the credibility gap, Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 195, 10.1023/A:1023351816790 · DOI
- 2022, Do ESG reporting guidelines and verifications enhance firms' information disclosure?, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29, 1214, 10.1002/csr.2265 · DOI
- 2021, Global CSR, drivers and consequences: a systematic review, Journal of Global Responsibility, 12, 416, 10.1108/JGR-12-2020-0103 · DOI
- 2014, The institutionalisation of corporate social responsibility reporting, The British Accounting Review, 46, 198, 10.1016/j.bar.2014.03.001 · DOI
- 2006, Can less environmental disclosure have a legitimising effect? Evidence from Africa, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31, 763, 10.1016/j.aos.2006.03.001 · DOI
- 1996, Do Australian companies report environmental news objectively? An analysis of environmental disclosures by firms prosecuted successfully by the environmental protection authority, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 9, 50, 10.1108/09513579610116358 · DOI
- 2020, Measurement of corporate social responsibility: a review of corporate sustainability indexes, rankings and ratings, Sustainability, 12, 2153, 10.3390/su12052153 · DOI
- 2017, The quality of sustainability reports and impression management: a stakeholder perspective, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 30, 643, 10.1108/AAAJ-04-2015-2044 · DOI · Paper page
- 2023, Sustainability reporting quality and the financial sector: evidence from China, Meditari Accountancy Research, 31, 1190, 10.1108/MEDAR-05-2020-0899 · DOI
- 2012, The disclosure of industrial greenhouse gas emissions: a critical assessment of corporate sustainability reports, Journal of Cleaner Production, 29/30, 222, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.01.024 · DOI
- 1990, The association between environmental performance and environmental disclosure in annual reports and 10Ks, Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 3, 183
- 2019, Impact of disclosure and assurance quality of corporate sustainability reports on access to finance, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26, 832, 10.1002/csr.1724 · DOI
- 2020, CSR reporting communication: Defective reporting models or misapplication?, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27, 952, 10.1002/csr.1858 · DOI
- 2019, CSR committees on boards: the impact of the external country level factors, Journal of Management and Governance, 23, 759, 10.1007/s10997-018-9442-8 · DOI
- 2007, Communicating about corporate social responsibility: a comparative study of CSR reporting in Australia and Slovenia, Public Relations Review, 33, 1, 10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.11.001 · DOI
- 2020, Risk disclosure in listed Greek companies: the effects of the financial crisis, Accounting Research Journal, 33, 615, 10.1108/ARJ-03-2020-0050 · DOI
- 2003, A typology of stakeholder participation for company environmental decision‐making, Business Strategy and the Environment, 12, 292, 10.1002/bse.371 · DOI
- 1990, Corporate social disclosure practice: a comparative international analysis, Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 3, 159
- 2017, CSR reporting practices in visegrad group countries and the quality of disclosure, Sustainability, 9, 2322, 10.3390/su9122322 · DOI
- 2016, Assessing the quality of corporate social responsibility reports: the case of reporting practices in selected European Union member states, Quality and Quantity, 50, 399, 10.1007/s11135-014-0155-z · DOI
- 1996, Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 9, 77, 10.1108/09513579610109987 · DOI
- 2014, Legitimizing negative aspects in GRI-oriented sustainability reporting: a qualitative analysis of corporate disclosure strategies, Journal of Business Ethics, 123, 401, 10.1007/s10551-013-1801-4 · DOI
- 2018, The impact of voluntary environmental disclosure on firm value: Does organizational visibility play a mediation role?, Business Strategy and the Environment, 27, 1569, 10.1002/bse.2217 · DOI
- 2010, Disclosure measurement in the empirical accounting literature-a review article
- 2019, Does designing environmental sustainability disclosure quality measures make a difference?, Business Strategy and the Environment, 28, 525, 10.1002/bse.2262 · DOI
- 2009, Assurance of sustainability reports: impact on report users’ confidence and perceptions of information credibility, Australian Accounting Review, 19, 178, 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2009.00056.x · DOI
- 2011, Evaluating environmental disclosures: the relationship between quality and extent measures, The British Accounting Review, 43, 200, 10.1016/j.bar.2011.06.005 · DOI
- 2015, Corporate social responsibility research in accounting, Journal of Accounting Literature, 34, 1, 10.1016/j.acclit.2015.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 2016, The relationship between sustainability performance and sustainability disclosure–reconciling voluntary disclosure theory and legitimacy theory, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35, 455, 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2016.06.001 · DOI
- 2011, The emergence of triple bottom line reporting in Spain, Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting / Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 40, 195, 10.1080/02102412.2011.10779701 · DOI
- IFRS (2023), “IFRS S1 IFRS® sustainability disclosure standard”, in General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information, London, Vol. 46.
- 1980, Environmental performance and corporate disclosure, Journal of Accounting Research, 18, 614, 10.2307/2490597 · DOI
- 2015, The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations: Analysts' perceptions and shifting institutional logics, Strategic Management Journal, 36, 1053, 10.1002/smj.2268 · DOI · Paper page
- 2016, The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting: evidence from four countries, Harvard Business School Research, 11
- 2019, Adaptations of CSR in the context of globalization the case of the GCC
- 2014, Beyond financial reporting-international integrated reporting framework, Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 7, 73, 10.1177/0974686220140105 · DOI
- 2016, Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder governance around the world, Global Finance Journal, 29, 42, 10.1016/j.gfj.2015.04.003 · DOI
- 2024, A comparison of analysts’ and investors’ information efficiency of corporate social responsibility activities, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 15, 547, 10.1108/SAMPJ-02-2023-0079 · DOI
- 2019, Key issues and challenges in stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: a study of Australian local councils, Pacific Accounting Review, 31, 2, 10.1108/PAR-11-2017-0092 · DOI
- 2017, Corporate social responsibility and governance: Information disclosure in multinational corporations, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24, 555, 10.1002/csr.1428 · DOI
- 2019, Sartrean bad-faith? Site-specific social, ethical and environmental disclosures by multinational mining companies, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 32, 55, 10.1108/AAAJ-03-2016-2473 · DOI
- 2015, Quo vadis GRI? A (critical) assessment of GRI 3.1 a+ non-financial reports and implications for credibility and standardization, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20, 196, 10.1108/CCIJ-11-2013-0101 · DOI
- 2023, Corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance and stakeholder engagement: Evidence from the quantity and quality of CSR disclosures, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30, 504, 10.1002/csr.2370 · DOI
- 2016, International financial reporting standards, board governance, and accounting quality: a preliminary Indonesian evidence, Asian Review of Accounting, 24, 474, 10.1108/ARA-06-2014-0064 · DOI
- 2019, Choreographers of corporate social responsibility, International Journal of Business and Management Invention (IJBMI), 8, 34
- 2006, Comparability of sustainability reports. A comparative content analysis of Austrian sustainability reports, 581, 10.1007/978-1-4020-4974-3_26 · DOI
- 2023, Disclosure index development for sustainable procurement: an Australian perspective, Journal of Cleaner Production, 420, 138357, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138357 · DOI
- 2013, Determinants of GRI G3 application levels: the case of the fortune global 500, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20, 182, 10.1002/csr.1285 · DOI
- 2015, Quality of corporate social responsibility information, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 334, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.547 · DOI
- 2023, Information or pressure? The effect of director experience on CEO CSR compensation adoption and design, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting.
- 2021, How corporate social responsibility mediates the relationship between corporate governance and sustainability performance in UK: a multiple mediator analysis, Society and Business Review, 16, 201, 10.1108/SBR-12-2020-0143 · DOI
- 2023, Does board capital enhance corporate social responsibility disclosure quality? The role of CEO power, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30, 209, 10.1002/csr.2349 · DOI
- 2014, The relationship between corporate environmental performance and environmental disclosure: an empirical study in China, Journal of Environmental Management, 145, 357, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.009 · DOI
- 2017, A theoretical framework of external accounting communication, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 30, 433, 10.1108/AAAJ-04-2015-2039 · DOI
- 2022, Voluntary assurance of sustainability reports: evidence from Indonesia, Accounting Analysis Journal, 11, 44, 10.15294/aaj.v11i1.58810 · DOI
- 2015, CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: an empirical analysis, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59, 10.1016/j.cpa.2014.10.003 · DOI
- 2013, W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting [article], Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 13, 10.1007/s10551-012-1543-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 2018, Corporate governance mechanisms as drivers that enhance the credibility and usefulness of CSR disclosure, Journal of Management and Governance, 22, 565, 10.1007/s10997-018-9411-2 · DOI
- 2017, Assessing social and environmental performance through narrative complexity in CSR reports, Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 13, 166, 10.1016/j.jcae.2017.05.002 · DOI
- 2011, The role of institutional and reputational factors in the voluntary adoption of corporate social responsibility reporting standards, Journal Article]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39, 136, 10.1007/s11747-010-0214-5 · DOI
- 2024, From institutional integration to institutional demise: the disintegration of the international integrated reporting council (IIRC), Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 99, 102699, 10.1016/j.cpa.2023.102699 · DOI
- 1991, Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10, 297, 10.1016/0278-4254(91)90003-3 · DOI
- 2002, The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: a research note, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27, 763, 10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00028-4 · DOI
- 2020, Assurance on CSR reports: impact on the credibility perceptions of non-financial information by bank directors, Meditari Accountancy Research, 28, 833, 10.1108/MEDAR-10-2019-0597 · DOI
- 2017, Does innovation drive environmental disclosure? A new insight into sustainable development, Business Strategy and the Environment, 26, 893, 10.1002/bse.1950 · DOI
- 2016, Board diversity and CSR reporting: an Australian study, Meditari Accountancy Research, 24, 182, 10.1108/MEDAR-08-2015-0052 · DOI
- 2022, Quality of voluntary modern slavery disclosures: top Australian listed companies, Pacific Accounting Review, 34, 451, 10.1108/PAR-07-2021-0117 · DOI
- 1995, Corporate social and environmental reporting, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8, 47, 10.1108/09513579510146996 · DOI · Paper page
- 2019, Sustainability reporting and stakeholder engagement in Spain: Different instruments, different quality, Business Strategy and the Environment, 28, 221, 10.1002/bse.2251 · DOI
- 2019, Hide-and-seek in corporate disclosure: evidence from negative corporate incidents, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19, 158, 10.1108/CG-05-2018-0164 · DOI
- 2020, A qualitative analysis of GRI principles for defining sustainability report quality: an Australian case from the preparers’ perspective, Accounting Forum, 44
- 2010, Critical success factors for corporate social responsibility: a public sector perspective, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17, 205, 10.1002/csr.200 · DOI
- 2019, A review of corporate social responsibility in developed and developing nations, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26, 712, 10.1002/csr.1739 · DOI
- 2000, Could corporate environmental reporting shadow financial reporting?, Accounting Forum, 24
- 2022, Defining CSR disclosure quality: a review and synthesis of the accounting literature, Journal of Accounting Literature, 45, 1
- 2020, Corporate social responsibility and accountability: a new theoretical foundation for regulating CSR, International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 5, 2, 10.1186/s40991-019-0045-8 · DOI
- 2020, Corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure and the choice between bank debt and public debt, Accounting Horizons, 34, 151, 10.2308/acch-52631 · DOI
- 2021, The contribution of corporate social responsibility on SMEs performance in emerging country, Journal of Cleaner Production, 322, 129103, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129103 · DOI
- 2002, firm resources, quality signals and the determinants of corporate environmental reputation: some UK evidence, The British Accounting Review, 34, 257, 10.1006/bare.2002.0211 · DOI
- 2019, CSR reporting of sports organizations, 209, 10.1007/978-3-319-97649-5_6 · DOI
- 2005, Exploring differences in social disclosures internationally: a stakeholder perspective, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24, 123, 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2004.12.007 · DOI
- 2007, A comprehensive comparison of corporate environmental reporting and responsiveness, The British Accounting Review, 39, 197, 10.1016/j.bar.2007.05.004 · DOI
- 2018, Does gender diversity in the audit committee influence key audit matters' readability in the audit report? UK evidence, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25, 748, 10.1002/csr.1491 · DOI
- 2023, Examining the quality of the consolidated mandatory non-financial statements of a cooperative banking group: a longitudinal analysis, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30, 1573, 10.1002/csr.2436 · DOI
- 2020, Introducing fundamental accountability principles in sustainability reporting assessment: a cross-sectoral analysis from the Greek business sector, Environmental Quality Management, 29, 33, 10.1002/tqem.21689 · DOI
- 2018, CSR performance and the readability of CSR reports: too good to be true?, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25, 66, 10.1002/csr.1440 · DOI
- 1982, An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 7, 53, 10.1016/0361-3682(82)90025-3 · DOI
- 2016, Quality assessment of CSR reports–factor analysis, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 220, 541, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.530 · DOI
- 2023, CSR disclosure, quality measurement of, 1
- 2021, CSR communication research: a theoretical-cum-methodological perspective from semiotics, Business and Society, 60, 876, 10.1177/0007650319843623 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Hameed, F., Wilmshurst, T., & Horner, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Tasmania (AU)
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Hameed, Faisal
- Venue
- Pacific Accounting Review
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2024-09-03
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3/4
- Pages
- 433-467
- ISSN
- 0114-0582 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4402140130
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 1.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pacific Accounting Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Financial Reporting and XBRL
- Keywords
- corporate social responsibility disclosure, disclosure quality, Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting, Global Reporting Initiative, qualitative characteristics of financial reporting, greenwashing, stakeholder expectations, Sustainable Development Goals, transparency, benchmarking, accountability, governance factors, stakeholder engagement, corporate governance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CSR disclosure quantity to CSR disclosure quality – in pursuit of a disclosure quality index. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/par-11-2023-0161
- The paper
- Hameed, F., Wilmshurst, T., & Horner, C. (2024). CSR disclosure quantity to CSR disclosure quality – in pursuit of a disclosure quality index. Pacific Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/par-11-2023-0161