Cited by 209Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEmployee Performance and ManagementWorkplace Spirituality and Leadership

The impact of servant leadership and subordinates' organizational tenure on trust in leader and attitudes

C.H. Chan, Simon, Mak, Wai-ming·2014·Personnel Review

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between servant leadership, subordinates' trust in leader and job satisfaction, and whether subordinates' organizational tenure moderated the effect. Design/methodology/approach – A structured questionnaire survey was used to collect data by 218 employees in a service-oriented private firm in the People's Republic of China. Findings – The findings indicated that trust in leader mediated the relationship between servant leadership and subordinates' job satisfaction. Also, the positive effect of servant leadership on subordinates' trust in leader and job satisfaction was stronger for short-tenure subordinates than that for long-tenure subordinates. Originality/value – This paper enriches the existing leadership literature and contributes to the research into how and why servant leadership may influence subordinates' attitudes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/pr-08-2011-0125

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social exchange theory has been used to explain how servant leaders enhance followers' helping/OCB and commitment through mediating mechanisms such as trust and justice.

    “For example, social exchange theory has been used to explain how servant leaders enhance followers' helping/ organizational citizenship behaviors (Newman, Schwarz, Cooper, & Sendjaya, 2017) and commitment (Ling, Liu, & Wu, 2017), through mediating mechanisms such as trust (Chan & Mak, 2014) and justice (Schwepker Jr, 2016).”

    From Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research (2019) · cites this paper as Chan & Mak, 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
C.H. Chan, S., & Mak, W.-M.
Affiliations
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Venue
Personnel Review
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2014-03-04
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
272-287
ISSN
0048-3486 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018923695
Cited by
209
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
FWCI
23.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personnel Review (publishedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
Keywords
servant leadership, trust in leadership, job satisfaction, organizational tenure, subordinates, mediation, moderating effect, service industry employees

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review