Cited by 4Cultural and Historical StudiesDesign Education and PracticeArtificial Intelligence in Education

Empowering students through generative AI and cultural diversity in interdisciplinary fashion design education

Lee, Jennifer·2026·Research Journal of Textile and Apparel

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine how integrating cultural diversity and generative AI into coursework can enhance students’ creativity, critical thinking and innovation, enabling them to design culturally aware products for the global market. Design/methodology/approach Grounded in Stanford’s design thinking framework, the proposed course designs were developed to incorporate a range of cutting-edge artificial intelligence (AI) tools. A portion of the curriculum was pilot-tested in actual college courses with 52 students to assess its effectiveness in achieving the intended learning outcomes. Findings Integrating generative AI and cultural diversity in a fashion design course enhanced students’ creativity, critical thinking, cultural awareness and teamwork. AI tools simplified research and design tasks for those with fewer technical skills, allowing them to focus on innovation, whereas cultural diversity fostered collaboration and the exchange of ideas for global markets. This approach could also apply to Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields like engineering, where AI supports coding and design to improve learning and develop globally relevant solutions. This study had some limits. It used a small group of students from one school, so the results may not fit all. Some AI tools produced errors or were difficult to use, highlighting the need for clarity about AI’s limitations and careful attention to cultural appropriateness in generated results. Fu…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/rjta-02-2025-0017

Cites

37 of 39 references verified1 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Akçapinar, 2024, Exploring the impact of AI-driven design tools on creative education, Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 27, 45
  2. Choi, 2015, Fashioning modernity: western dress, beauty culture, and national identity in Korea, 1880s–1930s, Fashion Theory, 19, 245, 10.23071/jias.2005.11.3.75 · DOI
  3. Doe, 2023, Exploring the impact of generative AI on fashion design education, Journal of Fashion Technology and Innovation, 15, 123
  4. Estrada, 2025, Why AI agents are booming, and the real challenges behind the hype, Customer Relationship Management, 29, 6
  5. Kim, 2018, The impact of body shape on perceived apparel fit and satisfaction among US women, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 22, 519
  6. Kwon, 2018, Gender and modernity in colonial Korea: new women and modern girls, The Journal of Asian Studies, 77, 317
  7. Lyons, 2024, An exhibition on rational dress for Victorian women, History Today, 74, 1
  8. Sahu, 2024, Revolutionary applications of generative AI in higher education institutes (HEIs) and its implications, Library Philosophy and Practice, 2024, 1
  9. Wang, 2022, Integrating generative AI in art and design education: opportunities and challenges, International Journal of Art and Design Education, 41, 210

Authors
Lee, J.
Affiliations
Fashion Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Lee, Jennifer
Venue
Research Journal of Textile and Apparel
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2025-09-29
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
576-595
ISSN
  • 1560-6074 (ISSN-L)
  • 2515-8090
OpenAlex
W4414547593
Cited by
3
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
33.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Research Journal of Textile and Apparel (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Cultural and Historical Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
Keywords
generative AI, cultural diversity, fashion design education, interdisciplinary curriculum, design thinking, creativity, critical thinking, cultural awareness, teamwork, product design and development, cultural authenticity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review