Cited by 37Global trade, sustainability, and social impactInnovation and Knowledge ManagementInternational Business and FDI

Walking Before You Can Run: The Knowledge, Networks, and Institutions for Emerging Market SMEs

McDermott, Gerald A., Pietrobelli, Carlo·2017·Breaking up the Global Value Chain

Abstract

Advancing the ability of emerging market small and medium size enterprises (SMEs) to learn, absorb new technologies, and grow is one of the greatest challenges in economic development and to theories of knowledge transfer. This chapter analyzes the mechanisms that can facilitate or impede the participation of Latin American SMEs in global value chains (GVCs), and in turn improve their capabilities and productivity. We attempt to shift the focus of attention that scholars and policy-makers have toward the types of knowledge and network linkages that emerging market SMEs need to sustainably benefit from GVCs. By drawing on recent work from the knowledge theory of the firm, development, and network dynamics, we call into question a core assumption about the necessary benefits that can accrue to SMEs by being tied more closely to sources of pioneering technologies. We argue instead that in order to overcome legacies of resource constraints and technology gaps, these SMEs need access to a variety of applied and experiential knowledge that help them transform their existing organizational capabilities into ones that enable them to implement basic international process and product standards, in turn allowing them to learn from potentially fruitful relationships in GVCs. Because of the way such knowledge is created, through intense interactions and exchanges of tacit knowledge, access is constrained. With a focus on the need for broad based upgrading of SME capabilities, we further suggest that particular constellations of interorganizational networks and public-private institutions, often overlooked in IB research, are best suited to facilitate such access.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/s1571-502720170000030013

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Understanding innovation requires an acknowledgment of the interdependencies between large domestic firms (both state and private), foreign MNEs, and domestic SMEs.

    “Understanding innovation requires an acknowledgment of the interdependencies between large domestic firms (both state and private), foreign MNEs, and domestic small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McDermott, G. A., & Pietrobelli, C.
Venue
Breaking up the Global Value Chain
Published
2017-08-18
Pages
311-332
OpenAlex
W2744594718
Cited by
37
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
13.29
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • Iris (Roma Tre University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
Keywords
small and medium-sized enterprises, emerging markets, global value chains, knowledge transfer, tacit knowledge, interorganizational networks, public-private institutions, technology absorption, international standards, Latin America, economic development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review