The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of the blockchain on the supply chain: a theory-based research framework and a call for action
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: This paper aims to strive to close the current research gap pertaining to potential implications of the blockchain for supply chain management (SCM) by presenting a framework built on four established economic theories, namely, principal agent theory (PAT), transaction cost analysis (TCA), resource-based view (RBV) and network theory (NT). These theories can be used to derive research questions that are theory-based as well as relevant for the industry. This paper is intended to initiate and stimulate an academic discussion on the potential impact of the blockchain and introduces a framework for middle-range theorizing together with several research questions. Design/methodology/approach: This paper builds on previous theories that are frequently used in SCM research and shows how they can be adapted to blockchain-related questions. Findings: This paper introduces a framework for middle-range theorizing together with several research questions. Research limitations/implications: The paper presents blockchain-related research questions derived from four frequently used theories, namely, PAT, TCA, RBV and (NT). These questions will guide future research pertaining to structural (PAT, TCA) and managerial issues (RBV, NT) and will foster middle-range theory development in SCM research. Practical implications: Blockchain technology has the potential to significantly change SCM. Given the huge investments by industry, academic research is needed which investigates potential implications and supports companies. In this paper, various research questions are introduced that illustrate how the implications of blockchain on SCM can be investigated from different perspectives. Originality/value: To the best of the author’s knowledge, no academic papers are published in leading academic journals that investigate the relationship between SCM and blockchain from a theory-based perspective.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Coase, R. H. (1937) · Economica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x · Cited by 23,972
Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors
(1980) · Journal of Sustainable Competitive Intelligence · doi:10.24883/iberoamericanic.v2i2.38 · Cited by 16,592
The Nature of Theory in Information Systems1
Gregor, S. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148742 · Cited by 3,306 · cited 3×
“Theories focusing on prediction create testable propositions but may lack justi fi able causal explanations, while design and action research gives prescriptions for constructing artifacts (Gregor, 2006).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential1 Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives
Kshetri, N. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.005 · Cited by 2,149 · cited 2×
“The academic relevance of the blockchain has already been acknowledged for supply chain management (SCM) and logistics (Kshetri, 2018).”
BackgroundA Framework for Conceptual Contributions in Marketing
MacInnis, D. J. (2011) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.75.4.136 · Cited by 1,547
Theories in sustainable supply chain management: A structured literature review
Touboulic, A., & Walker, H. (2015) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-05-2013-0106 · Cited by 688
Trust, but Verify: Why the Blockchain Needs the Law
Werbach, K. (2018) · Berkeley Technology Law Journal · doi:10.15779/z38h41jm9n · Cited by 235
Kembro, J., Selviaridis, K., & Näslund, D. (2014) · Supply Chain Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-12-2013-0460 · Cited by 168
Cited by
Dutta, P., Choi, T.-M., Somani, S., & Butala, R. (2020) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2020.102067 · Cited by 1,545
Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature
Kano, L., Tsang, E. W. K., & Yeung, H. W.-C. (2020) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-020-00304-2 · Cited by 767
Leveraging the Internet of Things and Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management
Rejeb, A., Keogh, J. G., & Treiblmaier, H. (2019) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi11070161 · Cited by 538
Self-citationChowdhury, S., Budhwar, P., Dey, P. K., Joel-Edgar, S., & Abadie, A. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.069 · Cited by 531
The Effect of Blockchain Technology on Supply Chain Sustainability Performances
Park, A., & Li, H. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13041726 · Cited by 455
Metadata
- Authors
- Treiblmaier, H.
- Venue
- Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2018-09-10
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 545-559
- ISSN
- 1359-8546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2896085285
- Cited by
- 928
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 108.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of the blockchain on the supply chain: a theory-based research framework and a call for action. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/scm-01-2018-0029
- The paper
- Treiblmaier, H. (2018). The impact of the blockchain on the supply chain: a theory-based research framework and a call for action. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-01-2018-0029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.