The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Knowing‐Doing Gap: How Smart Companies Turn Knowledge into Action
Abstract
Why are there so many gaps between what firms know they should do and what they actually do? Why do so many companies fail to implement the experience and insight they've worked so hard to acquire? The Knowing-Doing Gap is the first book to confront the challenge of turning knowledge about how to improve performance into actions that produce measurable results. Jeffrey Pfeffer and Robert Sutton, well-known authors and teachers, identify the causes of the knowing-doing gap and explain how to close it. The message is clear--firms that turn knowledge into action avoid the "smart talk trap." Executives must use plans, analysis, meetings, and presentations to inspire deeds, not as substitutes for action. Companies that act on their knowledge also eliminate fear, abolish destructive internal competition, measure what matters, and promote leaders who understand the work people do in their firms. The authors use examples from dozens of firms that show how some overcome the knowing-doing gap, why others try but fail, and how still others avoid the gap in the first place. The Knowing-Doing Gap is sure to resonate with executives everywhere who struggle daily to make their firms both know and do what they know. It is a refreshingly candid, useful, and realistic guide for improving performance in today's business.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Beechler, S., & Woodward, I. C. (2009) · Journal of International Management · doi:10.1016/j.intman.2009.01.002 · Cited by 678
Are we there yet? What's next for HR?
Ulrich, D., & Dulebohn, J. H. (2015) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.01.004 · Cited by 495
Trustworthy Online Controlled Experiments: A Practical Guide to A/B Testing
Kohavi, R., Tang, D., & Xu, Y. (2020) · doi:10.1017/9781108653985 · Cited by 297
2014 AERA Distinguished Lecture: Accelerating How We Learn to Improve
Bryk, A. S. (2015) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x15621543 · Cited by 295
ORGANIZATIONAL PERCEPTION MANAGEMENT
Elsbach, K. D. (2003) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(03)25007-3 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Pfeffer, J.
- Venue
- Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2001-08-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 142-143
- ISSN
- 1359-8546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1829171255
- Cited by
- 1,191
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 157.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Knowing‐Doing Gap: How Smart Companies Turn Knowledge into Action. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/scm.2001.6.3.142.1
- The paper
- Pfeffer, J. (2001). The Knowing‐Doing Gap: How Smart Companies Turn Knowledge into Action. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/scm.2001.6.3.142.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.