The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impulse buying behaviour: an online-offline comparative and the impact of social media
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: This paper aims to explore the phenomenon of impulse buying in the fashion industry. The online and offline channels are compared to determine which is perceived as leading to more impulsive buying. Design/methodology/approach: As the result of the literature review, three research questions are proposed and examined through an online self-administered survey with 212 valid responses. Findings: Results show that the offline channel is slightly more encouraging of impulse buying than the online channel; factors that encourage online impulse buying explain this behaviour to a greater extent than do discouraging factors; social networks can have a big impact on impulse buying. Research limitations/implications: Findings are limited by the sampling plan, the sample size and the measurement of some of the variables; only one product type is analysed. Further research is needed to confirm that shipping-refund costs and delayed gratification (traditionally, discouraging factors of online buying) encourage online impulse buying; clarify contradictory results regarding the role of online privacy and convenience. This research contributes to the validation of a scale to measure the influence of social media on impulse buying behaviour. Practical implications: Offline companies can trigger the buying impulse to a greater extent than online retailers. Managers must carefully select social networks to encourage impulse buying, Facebook and Instagram being the most influential; Twitter has the least impact. Originality/value: This study compares the impulse buying phenomenon in both the physical store and the internet. Moreover, the influence of social networks on impulse buying is also explored.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 · Cited by 38,459
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs
Churchill, G. A. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377901600110 · Cited by 16,549
Normative Influences on Impulsive Buying Behavior
Rook, D. W., & Fisher, R. J. (1995) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209452 · Cited by 1,947 · cited 7×
“Greater product assortment Brohan (2000), Chen-Yu and Seock (2002) Advanced marketing techniques Brohan (2000), LaRose (2001), Koufaris (2002), Reibstein (2002), Kacen (2003), Koski (2004), Dawson and Kim (2009) Use of credit cards Dittmar and Drury (2000), LaRose (2001), Koski (2004), Karbasivar and Yarahmadi (2011),…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe significance of impulse buying today.
Stern, H. (1962) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224296202600212 · Cited by 1,049
Verhagen, T., & van Dolen, W. (2011) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2011.08.001 · Cited by 767
An Analysis of Factors Affecting on Online Shopping Behavior of Consumers
Moshrefjavadi, M. H., Rezaie Dolatabadi, H., Nourbakhsh, M., Poursaeedi, A., & Asadollahi, A. (2012) · International Journal of Marketing Studies · doi:10.5539/ijms.v4n5p81 · Cited by 383
The determinants of consumers’ online shopping cart abandonment
Kukar-Kinney, M., & Close, A. G. (2010) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-009-0141-5 · Cited by 283
Cited by
Influencers on Instagram: Antecedents and consequences of opinion leadership
Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.005 · Cited by 1,336
‘Instagram made Me buy it’: Generation Z impulse purchases in fashion industry
Djafarova, E., & Bowes, T. (2021) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102345 · Cited by 650
Ngo, T. T. A., Nguyen, H. L. T., Nguyen, H. P., Mai, H. T. A., Mai, T. H. T., & Hoang, P. L. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35743 · Cited by 73
Internet Celebrities’ Impact on Luxury Fashion Impulse Buying
Chen, M., Xie, Z., Zhang, J., & Li, Y. (2021) · Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.3390/jtaer16060136 · Cited by 56
Ukenna, S. I., Idoko, E. C., & Matthew, E. E. (2023) · International Journal of Electronic Business · doi:10.1504/ijeb.2023.132197 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Aragoncillo, L., & Orus, C.
- Venue
- Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2018-04-16
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 42-62
- ISSN
- 2444-9695 (ISSN-L)
- 2444-9709
- OpenAlex
- W2895946918
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 28.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impulse buying behaviour: an online-offline comparative and the impact of social media. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/sjme-03-2018-007
- The paper
- Aragoncillo, L., & Orus, C. (2018). Impulse buying behaviour: an online-offline comparative and the impact of social media. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC. https://doi.org/10.1108/sjme-03-2018-007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.