Cited by 12Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive FunctionEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesOnline and Blended Learning

Electrophysiology and hyperscanning applied to e-learning for organizational training

Balconi, Michela, Angioletti, Laura, Cassioli, Federico·2023·The Learning Organization

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of the remote training process on distance learning with the application of neurometrics and investigate the features of the training that promote better synchronization between trainers and trainees in terms of cognitive and emotional processes favorable to learning, during a condition of remote professional training. Design/methodology/approach The authors proposed a hyperscanning paradigm together with a conversational analysis to assess remote online training by collecting neurophysiological measures (frequency band analysis: delta, theta, alpha and beta) via multiple wearable electroencephalograms (EEGs) during a session of remote training. Findings Results showed increased delta activity in the trainer when he was leading the session and when the participants were exchanging feedback. The delivery of feedback was also linked to increased theta activity compared with the normal activity of the trainees. Finally, synchronization of EEG between trainer and trainee groups was found for the beta band. Research limitations/implications This study proposes to adopt a new multi-methodological approach that combines conversational analysis with the detection of remote neurometric parameters, in the field of educational neuroscience applied to organizational contexts. Practical implications Findings can help trainers in the development of their skills as trainers and in modeling remote training in organizations. Originality/value Findings highlight the crucial role of particular phases of the e-learning process, such as the feedback phase and the interaction trainer group, and they pointed out the relevance of neurophysiological measures to test the e-learning process.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/tlo-01-2023-0011

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Balconi, M., Angioletti, L., & Cassioli, F.
Affiliations
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
Venue
The Learning Organization
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2023-07-19
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
857-876
ISSN
0969-6474 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4384575653
Cited by
12
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Learning Organization (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
remote training, online learning, employee training, hyperscanning, EEG synchronization, feedback, delta oscillations, theta activity, beta band, neuroeducation, wearable EEG, conversation analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review