The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors influencing the biocompatibility of insertable silicon microshafts in cerebral cortex
Abstract
Insertable microelectrode arrays can be used to activate neurons or to sense neural signals for use in prosthetics. The relationship of the microelectrodes to the neurons is determined by random alignment and by biocompatibility. Issues that determine the biocompatibility of insertable microelectrode arrays were investigated. Arrays were implanted into the cortex of rabbit brain and fixed to the skull. Following six-month survival, neuron density as a function of distance from the shafts of the arrays was measured to assess destruction of neurons. Results from a limited number of tests indicated that there was minimal tissue response along the sides of the shafts when shafts were well sharpened, had sufficiently small tip angles, and were clean. Tissue was usually more reactive at the tips of the shafts. It was concluded that silicon microshafts of appropriate shaft and tip design were biocompatible along the sides of the shaft, but that relatively severe reactions could be anticipated at the tips. Recording or stimulation sites should be located away from the tips on the sides of the shafts for better coupling with individual neurons. Measurement of neuron density as a function of distance from the shafts was a sensitive and quantitative technique for assessing biocompatibility. Additional measures such as glial density as a function of distance from the shafts, and incidence of microhematoma formation were proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation
McCreery, D. B., Agnew, W. F., Yuen, T. G. H., & Bullara, L. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.102812 · Cited by 708
Edell, D. J. (1986) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.1986.325892 · Cited by 177
Self-citation
Cited by
Neural Stimulation and Recording Electrodes
Cogan, S. F. (2008) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.10.061807.160518 · Cited by 2,243
Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes
Polikov, V. S., Tresco, P. A., & Reichert, W. M. (2005) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.08.015 · Cited by 1,896
Biran, R., Martin, D. C., & Tresco, P. A. (2005) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2005.04.020 · Cited by 893
Brain-Controlled Interfaces: Movement Restoration with Neural Prosthetics
Schwartz, A. B., Cui, X. T., Weber, D. J., & Moran, D. W. (2006) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.019 · Cited by 792
Materials and technologies for soft implantable neuroprostheses
Lacour, S. P., Courtine, G., & Guck, J. (2016) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.63 · Cited by 738
Metadata
- Authors
- Edell, D. J., Toi, V. V., McNeil, V. M., & Clark, L. D.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 1992-06
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 635-643
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2143287453
- Cited by
- 479
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors influencing the biocompatibility of insertable silicon microshafts in cerebral cortex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/10.141202
- The paper
- Edell, D. J., Toi, V. V., McNeil, V. M., & Clark, L. D. (1992). Factors influencing the biocompatibility of insertable silicon microshafts in cerebral cortex. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.141202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.