Cited by 243Numerical methods in inverse problemsEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesDirection-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques

Selective minimum-norm solution of the biomagnetic inverse problem

Matsuura, K., Okabe, Y.·1995·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

A new multidipole estimation method which gives a sparse solution of the biomagnetic inverse problem is proposed. This solution is extracted from the basic feasible solutions of linearly independent data equations. These feasible solutions are obtained by selecting exactly as many dipole-moments as the number of magnetic sensors. By changing the selection, we search for the minimum-norm vector of selected moments. As a result, a practically sparse solution is obtained; computer-simulated solutions for Lp-norm (p = 2, 1, 0.5, 0.2) have a small number of significant moments around the real source-dipoles. In particular, the solution for L1-norm is equivalent to the minimum-L1-norm solution of the original inverse problem. This solution can be uniquely computed by using Linear Programming.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/10.387200

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • L1-norm regularization favors sparse source distribution and assumes that sources follow a Laplace prior distribution in Bayesian inference.

    “L1-norm regularization favors sparse source distribution (57–60); it assumes that the sources follow a Laplace prior distribution in Bayesian inference.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matsuura, K., & Okabe, Y.
Affiliations
Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo (JP)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
1995-06
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
608-615
ISSN
0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165411673
Cited by
243
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Numerical methods in inverse problems
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Direction-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
Keywords
minimum norm solution, sparse solutions, L1 norm, Lp norms, linear programming, magnetic source localization, basic feasible solution, dipole moment
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Magnetics, Mathematics, Methods, Models, Neurological, Nervous System Physiological Phenomena, Programming, Linear, Artifacts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review