Selective minimum-norm solution of the biomagnetic inverse problem
Abstract
A new multidipole estimation method which gives a sparse solution of the biomagnetic inverse problem is proposed. This solution is extracted from the basic feasible solutions of linearly independent data equations. These feasible solutions are obtained by selecting exactly as many dipole-moments as the number of magnetic sensors. By changing the selection, we search for the minimum-norm vector of selected moments. As a result, a practically sparse solution is obtained; computer-simulated solutions for Lp-norm (p = 2, 1, 0.5, 0.2) have a small number of significant moments around the real source-dipoles. In particular, the solution for L1-norm is equivalent to the minimum-L1-norm solution of the original inverse problem. This solution can be uniquely computed by using Linear Programming.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
L1-norm regularization favors sparse source distribution and assumes that sources follow a Laplace prior distribution in Bayesian inference.
“L1-norm regularization favors sparse source distribution (57–60); it assumes that the sources follow a Laplace prior distribution in Bayesian inference.”
From Electrophysiological source imaging: A noninvasive window to brain dynamics (2018) · cites this paper as [57]
Cites
Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem.
Sarvas, J. (1987) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/32/1/004 · Cited by 1,945 · see citing works
Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data
Mosher, J. C., Lewis, P. S., & Leahy, R. M. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.141192 · Cited by 1,048 · see citing works
Using a magnetometer to image a two-dimensional current distribution
Roth, B. J., Sepúlveda, N. G., & Wikswo, J. P. (1989) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.342549 · Cited by 463 · see citing works
Williamson, S. J., & Kaufman, L. (1981) · Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials · doi:10.1016/0304-8853(81)90078-0 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Wang, J.-Z., Williamson, S. J., & Kaufman, L. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.142641 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
An Evaluation of Methods for Neuromagnetic Image Reconstruction
Jeffs, B. D., Leahy, R. M., & Singh, M. (1987) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.1987.325996 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
SVD pseudoinversion image reconstruction
Shim, Y., & Cho, Z. H. (1981) · IEEE Transactions on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tassp.1981.1163632 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Fourier space solution to the magnetostatic imaging problem
Dallas, W. J. (1985) · Applied Optics · doi:10.1364/ao.24.004543 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Saito, Y., Itagaki, E., & Hayano, S. (1990) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.345978 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Fourier Imaging of Electrical Currents in the Human Brain from Their Magnetic Fields
Kullmann, W., & Dallas, W. J. (1987) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.1987.326031 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Linear estimation theory applied to the reconstruction of a 3-D vector current distribution.
Smith, W. E., Dallas, W. J., Kullmann, W., & Schlitt, H. (1990) · Applied Optics · doi:10.1364/ao.29.000658 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Sekihara, K., Haneishi, H., & Ohyama, N. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.141654 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Neuromagnetic localization using magnetic resonance images
Singh, M., Brechner, R. R., & Henderson, V. W. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.126920 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Smith, W. E. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.161331 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Alvarez, R. E. (1990) · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Biomagnetic Fourier imaging (current density reconstruction)
Alvarez, R. E. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.57767 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Kado, H., Kashiwaya, S., Higuchi, M., et al. (1989) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-0581-1_127 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Visualization of Magnetoencephalographic Data Using Minimum Current Estimates
Uutela, K., Hämäläinen, M., & Somersalo, E. (1999) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1999.0454 · Cited by 512 · see citing works
Electrophysiological source imaging: A noninvasive window to brain dynamics
He, B., Sohrabpour, A., Brown, E., & Liu, Z. (2018) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-062117-120853 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Electrophysiological Imaging of Brain Activity and Connectivity—Challenges and Opportunities
He, B., Yang, L., Wilke, C., & Yuan, H. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2011.2139210 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Time-frequency mixed-norm estimates: Sparse M/EEG imaging with non-stationary source activations
Gramfort, A., Strohmeier, D., Haueisen, J., Hämäläinen, M. S., & Kowalski, M. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.051 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Multimodal Functional Neuroimaging: Integrating Functional MRI and EEG/MEG
He, B., & Liu, Z. (2008) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2008.2008233 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Combining sparsity and rotational invariance in EEG/MEG source reconstruction
Haufe, S., Nikulin, V. V., Ziehe, A., Müller, K.-R., & Nolte, G. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.246 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
(2019) · Handbook of clinical neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-64032-1.00006-0 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Sparse source imaging in electroencephalography with accurate field modeling
Ding, L., & He, B. (2008) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20448 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Reconstructing cortical current density by exploring sparseness in the transform domain
Ding, L. (2009) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/54/9/006 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Space–time event sparse penalization for magneto-/electroencephalography
Bolstad, A., Veen, B. V., & Nowak, R. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.056 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Spatially sparse source cluster modeling by compressive neuromagnetic tomography
Chang, W.-T., Nummenmaa, A., Hsieh, J.-C., & Lin, F.-H. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.013 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Electrophysiological Mapping and Neuroimaging
He, B., & Ding, L. (2013) · Neural Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5227-0_12 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Current Density Reconstructions Using the L1 Norm
Wagner, M., Wischmann, H.-A., Fuchs, M., Köhler, T., & Drenckhahn, R. (2000) · Biomag 96 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1260-7_96 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Matsuura, K., & Okabe, Y.
- Affiliations
- Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo (JP)
- ORCID
- Matsuura, K.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 608-615
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2165411673
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 4.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Numerical methods in inverse problems
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Direction-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
- Keywords
- minimum norm solution, sparse solutions, L1 norm, Lp norms, linear programming, magnetic source localization, basic feasible solution, dipole moment
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Magnetics, Mathematics, Methods, Models, Neurological, Nervous System Physiological Phenomena, Programming, Linear, Artifacts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review