The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Parametric model derivation of transfer function for noninvasive estimation of aortic pressure by radial tonometry
Abstract
Aortic pressure can be estimated noninvasively by applying a transfer function (TF) to radial tonometry signals. This study compares the performance of prior approaches, based on Fourier transform and inverted aortic-to-radial model, with direct radial-to-aortic autoregressive exogenous (ARX) model. Simultaneous invasive aortic pressure and radial tonometry pressure were recorded during rest in 39 patients in the supine position. Individual radial-aortic TF's were estimated from 20 patients, and the average TF was used to predict aortic pressures in the remaining 19 patients. The direct average TF yielded accurate aortic systolic pressure estimation (error 0.4 +/- 2.9 mmHg) and good reproduction of the aortic pressure waveform (root mean squared error 2.2 +/- 0.9 mmHg). The inverted reverse TF (aortic radial) yielded comparable results, while the Fourier-based TF had worse performance. Individual direct TF provided improved predictive accuracy only for indexes which are based on higher frequency components of the waveform (augmentation index, systolic time period). An ARX average TF can be used to accurately estimate central aortic pressure waveform parameters from noninvasive radial pulse tracings, and its performance is superior to previous techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chen, C.-H., Nevo, E., Fetics, B., Pak, P. H., Yin, F. C. P., Maughan, W. L., & Kass, D. A. (1997) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.95.7.1827 · Cited by 1,307
Self-citationKARAMANOGLU, M., O'ROURKE, M. F., AVOLIO, A. P., & KELLY, R. P. (1993) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/14.2.160 · Cited by 873
Cited by
Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications
Laurent, S., Cockcroft, J., Van Bortel, L., Boutouyrie, P., Giannattasio, C., Hayoz, D., Pannier, B., Vlachopoulos, C., Wilkinson, I., Struijker-Boudier, H., et al. (2006) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl254 · Cited by 6,077
Pauca, A. L., O’Rourke, M. F., & Kon, N. D. (2001) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hy1001.096106 · Cited by 1,179
Kawaguchi, M., Hay, I., Fetics, B., & Kass, D. A. (2003) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000048123.22359.a0 · Cited by 934
Self-citationO'Rourke, M. F., Pauca, A., & Jiang, X. (2001) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01400.x · Cited by 640
Pulse wave analysis and pulse wave velocity: a critical review of their strengths and weaknesses
Davies, J. I., & Struthers, A. D. (2003) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/00004872-200303000-00004 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Fetics, B., Nevo, E., Chen, C.-H., & Kass, D. A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 698-706
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162379377
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parametric model derivation of transfer function for noninvasive estimation of aortic pressure by radial tonometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/10.764946
- The paper
- Fetics, B., Nevo, E., Chen, C.-H., & Kass, D. A. (1999). Parametric model derivation of transfer function for noninvasive estimation of aortic pressure by radial tonometry. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.764946
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.