The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the retention time distribution of dynamic random access memory (DRAM)
Abstract
The retention time distribution of high-density dynamic random access memory (DRAM) has been investigated. The key issue for controlling the retention time distribution has been clarified and its model has been proposed for the first time. Trench capacitor cell with 0.6-/spl mu/m ground rule was evaluated. It was found that the retention time distribution consists of "tail distribution" and "main distribution." "tail distribution," by which DRAM refresh characteristics are restricted, depends on the boron concentration of the memory cell region. As boron concentration of the memory cell region increases, "tail distribution" is enhanced. This enhancement is due to the increase of the junction leakage current from the storage node. For the purpose of accounting for the nature of "Tail Distribution," the concept of thermionic field emission (TFE) current has been introduced. The high electric field at pn junction of the storage node enhances thermionic field emission from a deep level. The activation energy of the deep level is normally distributed among the memory cells, which leads to the normal distribution of log(retention time). Two methods for reducing "tail distribution" are proposed. One is to reduce the electric field of the depletion layer of the storage node. The other is to reduce the concentration of the deep level for TFE current.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
DRAM errors in the wild: a large-scale field study
Schroeder, B., Pinheiro, E., & Weber, W.-D. (2009) · Proceedings of the eleventh international joint conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems · doi:10.1145/1555349.1555372 · Cited by 557
RAIDR: Retention-Aware Intelligent DRAM Refresh
Liu, J., Jaiyen, B., Veras, R., & Mutlu, O. (2012) · ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News · doi:10.1145/2366231.2337161 · Cited by 444
Liu, J., Jaiyen, B., Kim, Y., Wilkerson, C., & Mutlu, O. (2013) · Proceedings of the 40th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture · doi:10.1145/2485922.2485928 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamamoto, T., Sugiura, S., & Sawada, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1300-1309
- ISSN
- 0018-9383 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2119435553
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the retention time distribution of dynamic random access memory (DRAM). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/16.678551
- The paper
- Hamamoto, T., Sugiura, S., & Sawada, S. (1998). On the retention time distribution of dynamic random access memory (DRAM). IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. https://doi.org/10.1109/16.678551
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.