The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation: a contextual framework
Abstract
There have been many attempts to discover the critical factors that can indicate the success or failure of R&D projects and new product introductions. Because of the large number of studies that exist, the authors undertook an extensive review of the germane literature to find whether a general agreement exists about the factors leading to success or failure in new product development and R&D projects. The review shows first that even with a conservative approach to listing significant factors, the list is very long. Second, comparing the factors across studies demonstrates that different authors have found that the magnitude of significance and the direction of influence vary. Third, given the differences in context, the meaning of similar factors may also vary. The contradictory findings lead us to propose a contingency framework for the new product and R&D project models. This framework consists of a contingency cube with three contextual dimensions. Based on this framework, we propose a set of propositions. We conclude this paper with a discussion of the implications of a contingent approach for both researchers and managers in the area of management of new products and R&D projects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study
Mansfield, E. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.2.173 · Cited by 1,128
SAPPHO updated - project SAPPHO phase II
Rothwell, R., Freeman, C., Horlsey, A., Jervis, V. T. P., Robertson, A. B., & Townsend, J. (1974) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(74)90010-9 · Cited by 717
Cited by
Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/1540-5885.1920110 · Cited by 3,470
Welfare Implications of User Innovation
Henkel, J., & von Hippel, E. (2005) · Essays in Honor of Edwin Mansfield · doi:10.1007/0-387-25022-0_5 · Cited by 174
Factors affecting participation of solvers in crowdsourcing: an empirical study from China
Shao, B., Shi, L., Xu, B., & Liu, L. (2012) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-012-0093-3 · Cited by 97
Toward a NASA-Specific Project Management Framework
Shenhar, A., Dvir, D., Milosevic, D., Mulenburg, J., Patanakul, P., Reilly, R., Ryan, M., Sage, A., Sauser, B., Srivannaboon, S., et al. (2005) · Engineering Management Journal · doi:10.1080/10429247.2005.11431667 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Balachandra, R., & Friar, J. H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 276-287
- ISSN
- 0018-9391 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158340923
- Cited by
- 660
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.