CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 197Technology Adoption and User BehaviourGlobal and Cross-Cultural ManagementCultural Differences and Values

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dimensions of national culture and corporate adoption of IT infrastructure

Png, I.P.L., Tan, B.C.Y., Khai-Ling Wee·2001·IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
DOI 10.1109/17.913164
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Corporate adoption of information technology (IT) infrastructure is a critical management issue that may be affected by national culture. Prior research has shown that dimensions of national culture affect development of national IT infrastructure as well as adoption and impact of IT applications. This study explores the impact of two dimensions of national culture (uncertainty avoidance and power distance) on the adoption of a type of IT infrastructure (frame relay). A multinational survey was carried out, and it yielded useable responses from 153 businesses from 24 countries. The results demonstrated that businesses from higher uncertainty avoidance countries were less likely to adopt frame relay. A one-point increase in Hofstede's uncertainty avoidance index for the country of incorporation was associated with a 3% lower likelihood of adopting frame relay. Power distance was not significantly correlated with adoption of frame relay. These results highlight the relevance of dimensions of national culture as factors affecting corporate adoption of IT infrastructure. Implications for practice and further research are presented.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/17.913164

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. 1998, Center for TeleMedia Strategy, National University of Singapore
  2. Gourley, 1998, Letter to the editor, Data Communications, 16
  3. Kerlinger, 1986, Foundations of Behavioral Res.
  4. 1996, Moody’s Investors Service
  5. 10.2307/258126 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Ward, 1996, Strategic Planning for Inform. Systems
  7. 1999, International Telecommunications Union

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 197

Related

Metadata

Authors
Png, I. P. L., Tan, B. C. Y., & Wee, K.-L.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Daimler (Germany) (DE)
ORCID
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
Publisher
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Published
2001
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
36-45
ISSN
0018-9391 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1109/17.913164
OpenAlex
W2151039981
Cited by
197
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 19
FWCI
17.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplorehelp/downloads/license-information/IEEE.html (vor)
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Funders
Nanzan University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › Global and Cross-Cultural Management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
national culture, Frame Relay, uncertainty avoidance, power distance, Hofstede cultural dimensions, multinational corporations, business technology adoption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review