Cited by 426Technology Adoption and User BehaviourCultural Differences and ValuesConsumer Behavior and Marketing Influence

The effects of national culture values on consumer acceptance of e-commerce: Online shoppers in China

Yoon, Cheolho·2009·Information & Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.im.2009.06.001

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yoon, C.
Affiliations
Mokpo National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Yoon, Cheolho
Venue
Information & Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-06
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
294-301
ISSN
0378-7206 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021433146
Cited by
425
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 23
FWCI
31.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Information & Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
Keywords
national culture, online shopping, consumer behavior, Hofstede cultural dimensions, uncertainty avoidance, long-term orientation, masculinity, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, trust, intention to use, moderating effect, Chinese consumers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review