The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrating environmental concerns into the design process: the gap between theory and practice
Abstract
This paper focuses on the product design process and integration of environmental performance criteria during this critical stage. Specifically, the authors explore environmentally responsible manufacturing (ERM) as perceived and acted on by two critical groups within this design process. The first consists of the champions and supporters of ERM, who either formally or informally act as advocates of ERM within the organization. The second consists of the users of design for environment (DfE) tools and procedures. Typically, these people consist of product designers and design engineers. The authors study these two groups through in-depth interviews with managers and engineers in a sample of ten firms drawn from the "best-in-class" environmental leaders. They found that a large gap exists between the ERM supporters and the users of ERM tools in terms of expectations, perceptions and orientations toward ERM principles, practices and tools. To overcome some of the many obstacles preventing effective integration of environmental criteria into the design process, they conclude with a process map that proposes the following steps: (1) enlisting support of a corporate champion; (2) defining environmental goals; (3) selecting a pilot project; (4) setting product launch goals and evaluation system; (5) enlisting support of team members; (6) providing DfE tools and training; (7) monitoring the project; and (8) celebrating successes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97 · Cited by 13,365
Cutting waste with employee involvement teams
May, D. R., & Flannery, B. L. (1995) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/0007-6813(95)90033-0 · Cited by 119
Cited by
Environmental management systems and green supply chain management: complements for sustainability?
Darnall, N., Jolley, G. J., & Handfield, R. (2008) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.557 · Cited by 799
Self-citationAbdul-Rashid, S. H., Sakundarini, N., Raja Ghazilla, R. A., & Thurasamy, R. (2017) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-04-2015-0223 · Cited by 503
The impact of external institutional drivers and internal strategy on environmental performance
Hanim Mohamad Zailani, S., Eltayeb, T. K., Hsu, C., & Choon Tan, K. (2012) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443571211230943 · Cited by 313
Paulraj, A. (2009) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.612 · Cited by 295
The entrepreneurial intention of university students: An environmental perspective
Barba-Sánchez, V., Mitre-Aranda, M., & Brío-González, J. D. (2022) · European Research on Management and Business Economics · doi:10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100184 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Handfield, R. B., Melnyk, S. A., Calantone, R. J., & Curkovic, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 189-208
- ISSN
- 0018-9391 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2144596297
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 22.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrating environmental concerns into the design process: the gap between theory and practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/17.922478
- The paper
- Handfield, R. B., Melnyk, S. A., Calantone, R. J., & Curkovic, S. (2001). Integrating environmental concerns into the design process: the gap between theory and practice. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.922478
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.