The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On information rates for mismatched decoders
Abstract
Reliable transmission over a discrete-time memoryless channel with a decoding metric that is not necessarily matched to the channel (mismatched decoding) is considered. It is assumed that the encoder knows both the true channel and the decoding metric. The lower bound on the highest achievable rate found by Csiszar and Korner (1981) and by Hui (1983) for DMC's, hereafter denoted C/sub LM/, is shown to bear some interesting information-theoretic meanings. The bound C/sub LM/ turns out to be the highest achievable rate in the random coding sense, namely, the random coding capacity for mismatched decoding. It is also demonstrated that the /spl epsiv/-capacity associated with mismatched decoding cannot exceed C/sub LM/. New bounds and some properties of C/sub LM/ are established and used to find relations to the generalized mutual information and to the generalized cutoff rate. The expression for C/sub LM/ is extended to a certain class of memoryless channels with continuous input and output alphabets, and is used to calculate C/sub LM/ explicitly for several examples of theoretical and practical interest. Finally, it is demonstrated that in contrast to the classical matched decoding case, here, under the mismatched decoding regime, the highest achievable rate depends on whether the performance criterion is the bit error rate or the message error probability and whether the coding strategy is deterministic or randomized.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Anderson, J. B., Rusek, F., & Owall, V. (2013) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2012.2233451 · Cited by 417
Measuring Integrated Information from the Decoding Perspective
Oizumi, M., Amari, S.-I., Yanagawa, T., Fujii, N., & Tsuchiya, N. (2016) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004654 · Cited by 184
Improved measures of integrated information
Tegmark, M. (2016) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005123 · Cited by 128
Measuring integrated information: comparison of candidate measures in theory and simulation
Mediano, P., Seth, A., & Barrett, A. (2018) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e21010017 · Cited by 145
Metadata
- Authors
- Merhav, N., Kaplan, G., Lapidoth, A., & Shamai Shitz, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1953-1967
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2154433856
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On information rates for mismatched decoders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/18.340469
- The paper
- Merhav, N., Kaplan, G., Lapidoth, A., & Shamai Shitz, S. (1994). On information rates for mismatched decoders. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.340469
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.