Cited by 147Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceComplex Systems and DynamicsFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Measuring integrated information: comparison of candidate measures in theory and simulation

Open access
Mediano, Pedro, Seth, Anil, Barrett, Adam·2018·Entropy

Abstract

Integrated Information Theory (IIT) is a prominent theory of consciousness that has at its centre measures that quantify the extent to which a system generates more information than the sum of its parts. While several candidate measures of integrated information (" Φ ") now exist, little is known about how they compare, especially in terms of their behaviour on non-trivial network models. In this article, we provide clear and intuitive descriptions of six distinct candidate measures. We then explore the properties of each of these measures in simulation on networks consisting of eight interacting nodes, animated with Gaussian linear autoregressive dynamics. We find a striking diversity in the behaviour of these measures-no two measures show consistent agreement across all analyses. A subset of the measures appears to reflect some form of dynamical complexity, in the sense of simultaneous segregation and integration between system components. Our results help guide the operationalisation of IIT and advance the development of measures of integrated information and dynamical complexity that may have more general applicability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/e21010017

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. [3]Griffith V. A principled infotheoretic ϕ-like measure arXiv 2014 1401.0978
  2. [6]Toker D. Sommer F.T. Great than the sum: Integrated information in large brain networks arXiv 2017 1708.02967
  3. [7]Mediano P.A.M. Farah J.C. Shanahan M.P. Integrated information and metastability in systems of coupled oscillators arXiv 2016 1606.08313
  4. [18]Cover T.M. Thomas J.A. Elements Information Theory Wiley Hoboken, NJ, USA 2006
  5. [20]Although the origins of causal density go as back as 1969, it hasn’t been until the last decade that it has found its way into neuroscience. The paper referenced in the table acts as a modern review of the properties and behaviour of causal density. This measure is somewhat distinct from the others, but is still a measure of complexity based on information dynamics between the past and current state; therefore its inclusion here will be useful.
  6. [26]Wiesner K. Gu M. Rieper E. Vedral V. Information-theoretic bound on the energy cost of stochastic simulation arXiv 2011 1110.4217
  7. [27]Williams P.L. Beer R.D. Nonnegative decomposition of multivariate information arXiv 2010 1004.2515
  8. [30]Griffith V. Koch C. Quantifying synergistic mutual information arXiv 2012 1205.4265
  9. [46]Mediano P.A.M. Shanahan M.P. Balanced information storage and transfer in modular spiking neural networks arXiv 2017 1708.04392
  10. [55]Toker D. Sommer F. Moving past the minimum information partition: How to quickly and accurately calculate integrated information arXiv 2016 1605.01096
  11. [58]Dayan P. Abbott L.F. Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems MIT Press Cambridge, MA, USA 2001

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mediano, P., Seth, A., & Barrett, A.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of Sussex (GB)
Corresponding author
Mediano, Pedro
Venue
Entropy
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2018-12-25
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
17
ISSN
1099-4300 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2811113323
Cited by
145
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 12
FWCI
16.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Entropy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/L005131/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Systems and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
integrated information theory, consciousness, dynamical complexity, integration and segregation, network models, measure comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review