The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Information distance
Abstract
While Kolmogorov (1965) complexity is the accepted absolute measure of information content in an individual finite object, a similarly absolute notion is needed for the information distance between two individual objects, for example, two pictures. We give several natural definitions of a universal information metric, based on length of shortest programs for either ordinary computations or reversible (dissipationless) computations. It turns out that these definitions are equivalent up to an additive logarithmic term. We show that the information distance is a universal cognitive similarity distance. We investigate the maximal correlation of the shortest programs involved, the maximal uncorrelation of programs (a generalization of the Slepian-Wolf theorem of classical information theory), and the density properties of the discrete metric spaces induced by the information distances. A related distance measures the amount of nonreversibility of a computation. Using the physical theory of reversible computation, we give an appropriate (universal, antisymmetric, and transitive) measure of the thermodynamic work required to transform one object in another object by the most efficient process. Information distance between individual objects is needed in pattern recognition where one wants to express effective notions of "pattern similarity" or "cognitive similarity" between individual objects and in thermodynamics of computation where one wants to analyze the energy dissipation of a computation from a particular input to a particular output.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process
Landauer, R. (1961) · IBM Journal of Research and Development · doi:10.1147/rd.53.0183 · Cited by 4,980
The thermodynamics of computation—a review
Bennett, C. H. (1982) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02084158 · Cited by 2,006
Self-citationFeynman, R. P. (1985) · Optics News · doi:10.1364/on.11.2.000011 · Cited by 1,023
Time/Space Trade-Offs for Reversible Computation
Bennett, C. H. (1989) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/0218053 · Cited by 405
Self-citationBenioff, P. A. (1982) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01857725 · Cited by 113
Cited by
The Google Similarity Distance
Cilibrasi, R. L., & Vitanyi, P. M. B. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2007.48 · Cited by 1,760
Self-citationSimplicity: a unifying principle in cognitive science?
Chater, N., & Vitányi, P. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(02)00005-0 · Cited by 494
Integrated information theory of consciousness: an updated account.
(2012) · PubMed · doi:10.4449/aib.v149i5.1388 · Cited by 370
Singh, J., & Behal, S. (2020) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100279 · Cited by 253
On the irreducibility of consciousness and its relevance to free will
Tononi, G. (2013) · Is Science Compatible with Free Will? · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5212-6_11 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennett, C. H., Gacs, P., Li, M., Vitanyi, P. M. B., & Zurek, W. H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 1998-07
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1407-1423
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9654
- OpenAlex
- W2295278941
- Cited by
- 506
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 4.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Information distance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/18.681318
- The paper
- Bennett, C. H., Gacs, P., Li, M., Vitanyi, P. M. B., & Zurek, W. H. (1998). Information distance. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.681318
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.