Cited by 498Categorization, perception, and languageComputability, Logic, AI AlgorithmsCognitive Science and Education Research

Simplicity: a unifying principle in cognitive science?

Chater, Nick, Vitányi, Paul·2003·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Much of perception, learning and high-level cognition involves finding patterns in data. But there are always infinitely many patterns compatible with any finite amount of data. How does the cognitive system choose 'sensible' patterns? A long tradition in epistemology, philosophy of science, and mathematical and computational theories of learning argues that patterns 'should' be chosen according to how simply they explain the data. This article reviews research exploring the idea that simplicity drives a wide range of cognitive processes. We outline mathematical theory, computational results and empirical data that underpin this viewpoint.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)00005-0

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compression is a key feature of both human cognition and machine learning.

    “Compression is a key feature of both human cognition and machine learning 109 ;”

    From Machine culture (2023) · cites this paper as [109]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 3 Li, M. and Vita ´nyi, P. (1997) AnIntroduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and its Applications , 2nd edn, Springer-Verlag
  2. 10 Rissanen, J. (1989) Stochastic complexity and statistical inquiry. World Scientific Series in Computer Science (Vol 15), World Scientific
  3. 19 Chater, N. and Vita ´ nyi, P. (2003) Generalized law of universal generalization. J. Math. Psychol. in press
  4. 38 Sober, E. (1975) Simplicity , Clarendon Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chater, N., & Vitányi, P.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-01
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
19-22
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093777421
Cited by
494
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 19
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
Keywords
simplicity, pattern selection, inductive reasoning, epistemology, philosophy of science, perception, generalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review