The DOI matches its Crossref record; 128 of the 128 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detection and mitigation of DDoS attacks in SDN: A comprehensive review, research challenges and future directions
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Many security solutions have been proposed in the past to protect Internet architecture from a diversity of malware. However, the security of the Internet and its applications is still an open research challenge. Researchers continuously working on novel network architectures such as HTTP as the narrow waist, Named Data Networking (NDN), programmable networks and Software-Defined Networking (SDN) for designing a more reliable network. Among these, SDN has emerged as a more robust and secure solution to combat against such malicious activities. In SDN, bifurcation of control plane and data plane provides more manageability, control, dynamic updating of rules, analysis, and global view of the network using a centralized controller. Though SDN seems a secured network architecture as compared to the conventional IP-based networks, still, SDN itself is vulnerable to many types of network intrusions and facing severe deployment challenges. This paper systematically reviews around 70 prominent DDoS detection and mitigation mechanisms in SDN networks. These mechanisms are characterized into four categories, viz: Information theory-based methods, Machine learning-based methods, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) based methods and other miscellaneous methods. The paper also dowries and deliberates on various open research issues, gaps and challenges in the deployment of a secure SDN-based DDoS defence solution. Such an exhaustive review will surely help the researcher community to provide more robust and reliable DDoS solutions in SDN networks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
McKeown (2008) · doi:10.1145/1355734.1355746 · Cited by 8,513
Software-Defined Networking: A Comprehensive Survey
Kreutz, D., Ramos, F. M. V., Esteves Verissimo, P., Esteve Rothenberg, C., Azodolmolky, S., & Uhlig, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2014.2371999 · Cited by 5,050
A Survey of Software-Defined Networking: Past, Present, and Future of Programmable Networks
Nunes, B. A. A., Mendonca, M., Nguyen, X.-N., Obraczka, K., & Turletti, T. (2014) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2014.012214.00180 · Cited by 2,203
NOX: towards an operating system for networks
Gude, N., Koponen, T., Pettit, J., Pfaff, B., Casado, M., McKeown, N., & Shenker, S. (2008) · ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review · doi:10.1145/1384609.1384625 · Cited by 1,446
Improving network management with software defined networking
Kim, H., & Feamster, N. (2013) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2013.6461195 · Cited by 1,259
Onix: a distributed control platform for large-scale production networks
Koponen, T., Casado, M., Gude, N. S., Stribling, J., Poutievski, L., Zhu, M., Ramanathan, R., Iwata, Y., Inoue, H., Hama, T., et al. (2010) · doi:10.5555/1924943.1924968 · Cited by 1,212
A Survey on Software-Defined Networking
Xia, W., Wen, Y., Foh, C. H., Niyato, D., & Xie, H. (2015) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2014.2330903 · Cited by 1,096
Mukherjee, B., Heberlein, L. T., & Levitt, K. N. (1994) · IEEE Network · doi:10.1109/65.283931 · Cited by 1,043
Are we ready for SDN? Implementation challenges for software-defined networks
Sezer, S., Scott-Hayward, S., Chouhan, P., Fraser, B., Lake, D., Finnegan, J., Viljoen, N., Miller, M., & Rao, N. (2013) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2013.6553676 · Cited by 987
Cited by
Rasool, R. U., Ahmad, H. F., Rafique, W., Qayyum, A., & Qadir, J. (2022) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2022.103332 · Cited by 177
A comprehensive survey on SDN security: threats, mitigations, and future directions
Maleh, Y., Qasmaoui, Y., El Gholami, K., Sadqi, Y., & Mounir, S. (2023) · Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments · doi:10.1007/s40860-022-00171-8 · Cited by 153
Bhardwaj, A., Mangat, V., Vig, R., Halder, S., & Conti, M. (2021) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100332 · Cited by 100
ADAM: An adaptive DDoS attack mitigation scheme in software-defined cyber-physical system
Cai, T., Jia, T., Adepu, S., Li, Y., & Yang, Z. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2023.3240586 · Cited by 73
Privacy-Preserving and Security in SDN-Based IoT: A Survey
Ahmadvand, H., Lal, C., Hemmati, H., Sookhak, M., & Conti, M. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3267764 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, J., & Behal, S.
- Venue
- Computer Science Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 37
- Pages
- 100279
- ISSN
- 1574-0137 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3036012999
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 128
- FWCI
- 15.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection and mitigation of DDoS attacks in SDN: A comprehensive review, research challenges and future directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100279
- The paper
- Singh, J., & Behal, S. (2020). Detection and mitigation of DDoS attacks in SDN: A comprehensive review, research challenges and future directions. Computer Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100279
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.