The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantization index modulation: a class of provably good methods for digital watermarking and information embedding
Abstract
We consider the problem of embedding one signal (e.g., a digital watermark), within another "host" signal to form a third, "composite" signal. The embedding is designed to achieve efficient tradeoffs among the three conflicting goals of maximizing the information-embedding rate, minimizing the distortion between the host signal and composite signal, and maximizing the robustness of the embedding. We introduce new classes of embedding methods, termed quantization index modulation (QIM) and distortion-compensated QIM (DC-QIM), and develop convenient realizations in the form of what we refer to as dither modulation. Using deterministic models to evaluate digital watermarking methods, we show that QIM is "provably good" against arbitrary bounded and fully informed attacks, which arise in several copyright applications, and in particular it achieves provably better rate distortion-robustness tradeoffs than currently popular spread-spectrum and low-bit(s) modulation methods. Furthermore, we show that for some important classes of probabilistic models, DC-QIM is optimal (capacity-achieving) and regular QIM is near-optimal. These include both additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channels, which may be good models for hybrid transmission applications such as digital audio broadcasting, and mean-square-error-constrained attack channels that model private-key watermarking applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Secure spread spectrum watermarking for multimedia
Cox, I. J., Kilian, J., Leighton, F. T., & Shamoon, T. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/83.650120 · Cited by 5,299
Cited by
Information Forensics: An Overview of the First Decade
Stamm, M. C., Wu, M., & Liu, K. J. R. (2013) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2013.2260814 · Cited by 394
Anti-collusion fingerprinting for multimedia
Trappe, W., Wu, M., Wang, Z. J., & Liu, K. J. R. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2003.809378 · Cited by 382
Digital Image Watermarking Techniques: A Review
Begum, M., & Uddin, M. S. (2020) · Information · doi:10.3390/info11020110 · Cited by 303
Wang, Z., Wu, G., Sheikh, H. R., Simoncelli, E. P., Yang, E.-H., & Bovik, A. C. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2005.864165 · Cited by 293
A survey of Deep Neural Network watermarking techniques
Li, Y., Wang, H., & Barni, M. (2021) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2021.07.051 · Cited by 177
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, B., & Wornell, G. W.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1423-1443
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107465879
- Cited by
- 2,095
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 70.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantization index modulation: a class of provably good methods for digital watermarking and information embedding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/18.923725
- The paper
- Chen, B., & Wornell, G. W. (2001). Quantization index modulation: a class of provably good methods for digital watermarking and information embedding. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.923725
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.