Experimental investigation of ultrashort pulse laser-induced breakdown thresholds in aqueous media
Abstract
Laser-induced breakdown (LIE) thresholds are determined for pulse durations of 2.4 ps, 400 fs, and 100 fs at 580 mn in high purity water, saline and tap water. The dependence of LIE irradiance thresholds on pulse duration, optical wavelength, and focal volume is examined, and the experimental data obtained is compared with a theoretical model. The slopes of the probability curves calculated are compared with mechanisms for LIE, namely avalanche ionization, multiphoton initiated avalanche ionization, and multiphoton ionization. Lastly, the dependence of the peak breakdown electric field on pulse duration and focal volume is empirically determined and compared with previous work.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The presence of soluble species significantly reduces the intensity threshold of a liquid for its breakdown.
“In addition, the presence of soluble species also significantly reduces the intensity threshold of a liquid for its breakdown [113,114].”
From Nanoparticles Engineering by Pulsed Laser Ablation in Liquids: Concepts and Applications (2020) · cites this paper as [113]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nanoparticles Engineering by Pulsed Laser Ablation in Liquids: Concepts and Applications
Fazio, E., Gökce, B., De Giacomo, A., Meneghetti, M., Compagnini, G., Tommasini, M., Waag, F., Lucotti, A., Zanchi, C. G., Ossi, P. M., et al. (2020) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano10112317 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
“In addition, the presence of soluble species also significantly reduces the intensity threshold of a liquid for its breakdown [113,114].”
BackgroundVogel, A., Nahen, K., Theisen, D., & Noack, J. (1996) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1109/2944.577307 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Menéndez-Manjón, A., Chichkov, B. N., & Barcikowski, S. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp909897v · Cited by 79 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hammer, D. X., Thomas, R. J., Noojin, G. D., Rockwell, B. A., Kennedy, P. K., & Roach, W. P.
- Venue
- IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics
- Published
- 1996-04
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 670-678
- ISSN
- 0018-9197 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169946516
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 9.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- USA Dry Pea and Lentil Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Laser Material Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma
- Keywords
- laser-induced breakdown, breakdown threshold, ultrashort laser pulses, femtosecond pulses, picosecond pulses, aqueous media, saline water, tap water, irradiance threshold, pulse duration dependence, wavelength dependence, focal volume, avalanche ionization, multiphoton ionization, breakdown field
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review